AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It

[rightwinger]

You can expect the MAGA judge, Cannon, to be on the short list of USSC replacements if an opening coming up. trump has his cult positioned now.

What does that have to do with Blondie answering questions?

 

[odanny]

I've never seen a more unprofessional display, a less dignified appearance, before any Congressional hearing in my entire life.

I've watched these off and on for the past 40 years, and if one like this ever happened before, it would have been widely reported on.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Good for our AG. I am proud of her.

No you aren't.

You know full well she appeared childish and incompetent and screamed to the world that she was hiding something.

If your lawyer acted like that, you would start taking donations for your commissary.

 

[rightwinger]

I've never seen a more unprofessional display, a less dignified appearance, before any Congressional hearing in my entire life.

I've watched these off and on for the past 40 years, and if one like this ever happened before, it would have been widely reported on.

Blondie basically gave them the finger

 

[odanny]

Blondie basically gave them the finger

And this was the Attorney General of the United States, not some schmo with an axe to grind.

The AG has always been a position that is expected to convey an appearance of impartiality, at a bare minimum, a sense of decorum and professionalism.

 

[Dante]

I've never seen a more unprofessional display, a less dignified appearance, before any Congressional hearing in my entire life.

I've watched these off and on for the past 40 years, and if one like this ever happened before, it would have been widely reported on.

Patel took that spot B4 Pam -- incredible.

 

[BackAgain]

No you aren't.

I always laugh when other people tell me how I feel.

You’re wrong. She was great.

You know full well she appeared childish and incompetent and screamed to the world that she was hiding something.

Not at all. As I noted earlier, there a no valid purpose served in treating the Dim Senators’ “questions” as though they were legitimate. They aren’t. It was a Congressional hearing. But naturally the Dim Senators chose to engage in posturing.
Nothing they were asking was of any significance.

If your lawyer acted like that, you would start taking donations for your commissary.

My lawyer wouldn’t be asked about private and privileged conversations with me and if she or he were to be asked such questions, of course they wouldn’t answer, either.

I fully endorse sharing a bit of disrespect with those Dim hack blowhard Senators.

 

[Frankenstein]

Try harder not being a feckless nitwit.

AI Overview

The infamous "What difference, at this point, does it make?" quote from Hillary Clinton is most often associated with her January 2013 congressional testimony on the 2012 Benghazi attack. The phrase was widely used by critics to suggest she was callous toward the deaths of the four Americans killed. In context, however, the meaning of her statement changes, as she was frustrated with a line of questioning over the shifting intelligence about the attacks' origin.

AI which has a leftist slant? You are hilarious

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I always laugh when other people tell me how I feel.

You’re wrong. She was great.

Not at all. As I noted earlier, there a no valid purpose served in treating the Dim Senators’ “questions” as though they were legitimate. They aren’t. It was a Congressional hearing. But naturally the Dim Senators chose to engage in posturing.
Nothing they were asking was of any significance.

My lawyer wouldn’t be asked about private and privileged conversations with me and if she or he were to be asked such questions, of course they wouldn’t answer, either.

I fully endorse sharing a bit of disrespect with those Dim hack blowhard Senators.

Nah, your acting is terrible, and I don't believe you.

 

[mudwhistle]

too funny

You people are so used to seeing your Leader in a courtroom, you mistake every question about him and his team to be a legal proceeding in a court

Well.....congress is a courtroom as much as any court of law.
The members in congress are assumed to be under oath.
The quests or officials they're questioning are often under oath.
Just about every member of congress has a law degree, except AOC.
The point should be that if you're conducting a hearing you're bound by oath to uphold the law and not conduct yourself like a jackass.
Democraps have forgotten that long ago.

 

[Frankenstein]

No you aren't.

You know full well she appeared childish and incompetent and screamed to the world that she was hiding something.

If your lawyer acted like that, you would start taking donations for your commissary.

We are, she told the truth without being worried about your feewings. You people just aren't used to the thruth

 

[Dante]

Well.....congress is a courtroom as much as any court of law.

Whoooie!!!!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We are, she told the truth without being worried about your feewings. You people just aren't used to the thruth

No you're not. You know her performance was an embarrassment.

I know you peole just sometimes say what you think you have to say, and this is one of those times.

 

[mudwhistle]

And this was the Attorney General of the United States, not some schmo with an axe to grind.

The AG has always been a position that is expected to convey an appearance of impartiality, at a bare minimum, a sense of decorum and professionalism.

Thanks for pointing out the double-standards you Dummycraps live by.

I remember questioning by Democrats against former attorney generals.

It's rich that you would mention the above when you mofos stopped adhering to it long ago.

 

[Frankenstein]

No you're not. You know her performance was an embarrassment.

I know you peole just sometimes say what you think you have to say, and this is one of those times.

You are the embarrassment go color in the corner with your feelz rightwinger.

 

[westwall]

One of my US Senators, Adam Schiff went toe to toe with Trump’s attorney general in a Senate hearing, listing Every Question Pam Bondi Ignored. Senator Schiff is a loyal, patriotic, and great American - also an experienced prosecutor. We need more good men like him in the two houses of the US Congress.

1. Did Bondi consult with career ethics lawyers when she approved Trump’s acceptance of a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family?

2. Who ordered that Donald Trump’s name be flagged in the FBI’s review of the Epstein files?

3. Did Homan keep his $50,000 from the undercover agents?

4. Did Homan pay taxes on the $50,000?

5. Did DOJ prosecutors determine there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former FBI Director James Comey before he was indicted?

6. How did the administration determine whether U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean were legal?

(Here, Bondi interrupted, asking the senator, who worked for the justice department before his career in politics, “Do you have a law degree, Senator Schiff?”)

7. Did Bondi discuss indicting Comey with Trump?

8. Did Bondi approve the dismissal of antitrust lawyers who opposed the Hewlett Packard–Juniper merger?

9. Does Bondi support a “compensation fund” for people prosecuted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots?

10. Is Bondi firing career prosecutors for working on January 6 investigations?

11. Does Bondi think government officials must follow court orders?

Pam, she melted down.

“I think it’s valuable that the American people get a sense of what you’ve refused to answer today,” Schiff told Bondi.

Amazing fantasy life you lead.

 

[Dante]

Thanks for pointing out the double-standards you Dummycraps live by.

I remember questioning by Democrats against former attorney generals.

It's rich that you would mention the above when you mofos stopped adhering to it long ago.

Why are you alwasy conflating things and being so disingenuous? Did you get a military disability diagnosis?

 

[Delldude]

Fascism always seeks to avoid accountability. Always.

One aspect of fascism is using violence to achieve party rule. Censoring of political opponents also. I seem to remember things happening under Biden that fit that definition.

You hear about Biden quashing CIA reports about how Hunter was screwing up foreign policy shaking down countries for the Biden Crime Family?

 

[JimH52]

What does that have to do with Blondie answering questions?

True, just recognizing the extent of the MAGA hand in the legal system.

 

[MisterBeale]

This AG is an embarrassment and a liability to both the GOP and MAGA folks.

I have absolutely no love for DNC or RINO senators, but this display of incompetence is an embarrassment to the American public and a liability to the administration.

Glenn Reacts to Pam Bondi's PATHETIC Senate Hearing​

1 hour ago

Pam Bondi Battles With Democrats, Takes Arctic Frost Questions From Republicans In Senate Hearing​

22 hours ago