ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 66,359
- 75,357
- 3,615
Mods, can you change OP’s name to DIPSHIT FROM URANUS?
TIA.
TIA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey Einstein: Hillary didn't take the Fifth.How about that did she plead the 5th a bunch and say at this point what does it matter. No, then she can't compare to hitlery
Yep sounds like a typical day for you, after mom brings down your bagel bites to your fortress in the basement, so you can play GTADerp...belch....spittle
Irrelevant, gimp. She is a pubic servant who is supposed to answer to the American public, not King Trump.She stomped his his ass. Deal with it. That’s what you get for electing shitty people and basing your party on them.
There sure is. Stop acting stupid
No....that imbecile does not understand that.You understand her role as AG is to respectfully answer appropriate questions asked by elected officials, right?
The 5th amendment would cover that terrifying about that. Same result.Executive privilege means nothing in regards to illegal acts
Honesty? Do you feel that Merrick Garland was "honest" when he was questioned by Congressional committees?What's the context?
That doesn’t mean she has to put up with your retarded shit.Irrelevant, gimp. She is a pubic servant who is supposed to answer to the American public, not King Trump.
You're an imbecile and a child.
Wow. It would be hard to find anyone with such a poor performance.
Usually these politicians go and do one question or two but 14? Must be a record.
Pam did horribly.
Here are the dodges:
- Conversations with Trump about James Comey’s indictment
- The Epstein investigation / her decision to flag Epstein-related records
- Whether evidence existed to charge Comey
- Whether the DOJ had enough proof to indict Comey
- The alleged $50,000 bribe to Tom Homan and whether Homan returned it
- Trump receiving a jet from Qatar
- Trump’s name in Epstein’s records
- The creation of a Jan. 6 defendants’ restoration fund
- Whether government officials must comply with court orders
- The firing of lawyers who opposed a Hewlett Packard merger
- The broader politicization / “weaponization” of the DOJ
- The removal or firings of career prosecutors
- The department’s investigations of Trump or his associates
- The extent of Trump’s influence on DOJ decisions
Are you seeing this thread on the Politics forum? I can't.
Never mind, I just figured out why. I have the OP on ignore.
There was nothing wrong with the questions she was being asked....a competent AG would have professionally answered those questions. But Bondi is not competent.That doesn’t mean she has to put up with your retarded shit.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. So we’ll see," Holder said in an interview on the Tom Joyner radio show.”There was nothing wrong with the questions she was being asked....a competent AG would have professionally answered those questions. But Bondi is not competent.
Even worse...she is corrupt as hell, doing whatever the **** Trump wants her to do. That is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to operate.
And don't say that Democrats Presidents did this....they did not. Biden never used social media to tell Merrick Garland to arrest political enemies, like Trump has done with Bondi.
Nobody was diverting from the government shutdown. That had nothing to do with the hearing.Attorney General Pam Bondi came out swinging today during her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Democrats' plan was clear from the start: to distract and divert from their government shutdown, lawlessness in cities, rogue judges, and the death and destruction Joe Biden's open border policies unleashed.
Pam Bondi was having none of it and continuously brought the conversation back to what Democrats tried to avoid.
It’s one of those things: Democrats need to shift the focus on who’s to blame to mask their incompetence.
She came prepared, bringing a gun to the Democrats’ knife fight. When liberal media reporters admit that she was cooking Democrats, you know it’s bad.
Ken Dilanian
@DilanianMSNBC
Senate Democrats seem completely unprepared for the personal attacks
@AGPamBondi
came prepared to launch at each one of them today, and they are failing to rebut them.
11:36 AM · Oct 7, 2025
![]()
AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It
Pam Bondi dominates Senate Judiciary Committee, challenging Democrats on key issues.townhall.com
BJ -
Spectacular today.
Not every day.
Some days less -, but not today.
·
Nicole Wallace, who was Shrub's communications director, said reading talking points prepared by staff is a clear violation of the Hatch Act. But then violations only matter if the regime enforces the law and we all know that's not going to happen.........when it comes to the blonde sock puppet.Yeah, but she got a shitload of personal insults and snarky comments in there. That's the priority.
Try harder not being a feckless nitwit.How about that did she plead the 5th a bunch and say at this point what does it matter. No, then she can't compare to hitlery
She has the files. Johnson is refusing a vote to release the files. Trump is dangling a pardon to Maxwell to keep her quiet.I'm not. Joe Biden did. Epstein had a trial. G.Maxwell had a trial. Everything came out during those trials.
View attachment 1170888
Not in MAGALANDNone of those things exist.
By refusing to talk about anything. Ok.Bondi shoved it up the Dem's asses with a hot poker and they had to retreat to their Dem troll caves.