AG Garland Calls Trump's Bluff

[jasonnfree]

One year later: How the Biden Admin, Big Tech, and Pfizer fooled Americans into taking "FDA approved" COVID vaccines that never actually existed

Comirnaty is a ghost shot.

dossier.substack.com

THIS Is part why you can't believe a thing out of the left, the media, it's politicians, etc.

We've been getting nothing but lies from the republicans for decades going at least as far back as the Nixon administration. This Trump character's just carrying on the tradition. Democrats? As pure as the driven snow in comparison.

 

[Lesh]

We've been getting nothing but lies from the republicans for decades going at least as far back as the Nixon administration. This Trump character's just carrying on the tradition. Democrats? As pure as the driven snow in comparison.

Just to be clear…

In comparison.

No they are not saints . Who is?

 

[Calypso Jones]

Omigosh. Reinhard is JUST A MAGISTRATE. THE DOJ went JUDGE SHOPPING. What a bunch of JERKS.

14 whistle blowers have come forward...they better watch their backs.

 

[Lesh]

Omigosh. Reinhard is JUST A MAGISTRATE. THE DOJ went JUDGE SHOPPING. What a bunch of JERKS.

14 whistle blowers have come forward...they better watch their backs.

Uuiuuu… you found a new word! Good for you.

Unfortunately for you he is the Federal Magistrate for Florida

 

[Calypso Jones]

Uuiuuu… you found a new word! Good for you.

Unfortunately for you he is the Federal Magistrate for Florida

yeah. bullshit

Difference Between Magistrate and Judge (with Comparison Chart) - Key Differences

Five important differences between magistrate and judge are discussed in this article, One such difference is the judge is someone, who has got the decision making power in the law court, on a certain matter. On the other hand, the magistrate is more like an administrator who looks after the law...

keydifferences.com

JUDGE SHOPPING in the Pool of democrat trump haters.

 

[Leo123]

They know what they're doing and follow the law. Trump is ignorant and stubborn.

The Trump Investigations: Documents Taken From Trump’s Home Included Classified Material (Published 2022)

Items removed from Mar-a-Lago included files marked as top secret and meant to be viewed only in secure government facilities, according to a copy of the warrant.

www.nytimes.com

Oh look, another 'Orange Man Bad' post.....

 

[Calypso Jones]

ORANGEMAN2024

 

[Lesh]

Judge Who Approved Trump Search Warrant Was in Role by Chance

Bruce Reinhart handled the FBI’s request to search Mar-a-Lago when the on-duty judge was unavailable.

www.wsj.com

He was covering for the “duty” judge who was unavailable

Jesus people

 

[Calypso Jones]

BULLSHIT

 

[Calypso Jones]

 

[Lesh]

BULLSHIT

I gave you a link describing how Reinhart ended up being the judge involved.

And you gave us


bullshit

 

[Calypso Jones]

No....you're FULL of bullshit.

 

[Lesh]

We saw this same behavior when discussing the Veterans Burn Pit Bill.
You people refused to believe anything other than what your lying media and politicians claimed...all of which turned out to be LIES.

No matter what facts were shown to you

And THAT was about Vets! for God's sake

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

We saw this same behavior when discussing the Veterans Burn Pit Bill.
You people refused to believe anything other than what your lying media and politicians claimed...all of which turned out to be LIES.

No matter what facts were shown to you

And THAT was about Vets! for God's sake

If it was about the vets why don' the commies try writing a clean bill for crying out loud:

A release from GOP Senator Pat Toomey's office on Tuesday said that the PACT Act "would enable $400 billion over the next 10 years in spending completely unrelated to veterans." It noted that Toomey, a Pennsylvania lawmaker, has a "technical fix" that "does not reduce spending on veterans by even $1 or affect the expansion of care and benefits in the underlying bill."

Why the Veteran Health Care Bill Was Smacked Down by Republicans

GOP Senator Pat Toomey's office said the PACT Act "would enable $400 billion over the next 10 years in spending completely unrelated to veterans."

www.newsweek.com

Democrats don't care about any vets, they only care about themselves and use vets to try and get sympathy.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes, search warrants to recover documents from former government officials has been done before. General Patreus had a search warrant that revealed lots of classified information at his house.

Yes, a magistrate judge is the appropriate judge to sign off on a search warrant.

No, there is no reason for him to recuse himself.

No, searches to not have any obligation to be monitored by the person being searched.

No, Trump’s legal team did not give all documents to the search warrant. There is no “working” to be done. You hand them over when they say so.

No, it has nothing to do with the president running. He chose this path. He gets to deal with the consequences. The FBI is going to protect national security.

There’s nothing controversial.

The President of the United States is more than just a government official and no, no President has ever had his house raided by the Nazis in our history. Yes, the judge should have recused himself because he had a bias against Trump for some time and that's well documented. Any judge that has a hatred of the person in a case he's asked to handle is obligated to recuse themselves.

I never said the FBI was obligated to allow oversight, but disallowing it raises a lot of questions if they claim to have found something in Mar-A-Lago Trump claims he never had. The FBI has been corrupt at least since the DumBama administration.

It has everything to do with the President running again: two phony impeachments, a 30 million dollar phony Russian collusion investigation, trying to sick the NYC commies on Trump, the bogus so-called 1/6 investigation, and now this. All by design to try and stop Trump from running again.

 

[Lesh]

If it was about the vets why don' the commies try writing a clean bill for crying out loud:

A release from GOP Senator Pat Toomey's office on Tuesday said that the PACT Act "would enable $400 billion over the next 10 years in spending completely unrelated to veterans." It noted that Toomey, a Pennsylvania lawmaker, has a "technical fix" that "does not reduce spending on veterans by even $1 or affect the expansion of care and benefits in the underlying bill."

Why the Veteran Health Care Bill Was Smacked Down by Republicans

GOP Senator Pat Toomey's office said the PACT Act "would enable $400 billion over the next 10 years in spending completely unrelated to veterans."

www.newsweek.com

Democrats don't care about any vets, they only care about themselves and use vets to try and get sy in spite of the fact that it was pompathy.

Exactly my point.

It was always a clean bill.

And they still lie about it in spite of the actual bill being posted about 20 times as well as the VFW reviewing it and THAT being posted about ten times.

Because Pat fucking Toomey said....

They never bothered to read the damn bill or even listen to what the VFW had to say.

They just regurgitate nonsense lies...like here

 

[Lesh]

The President of the United States is more than just a government official and no, no President has ever had his house raided by the Nazis in our history.

And that didn't happen here either. The FBI used a legal warrant to recover docs that should have been returned a year and a half ago.

Yes, the judge should have recused himself because he had a bias against Trump for some time and that's well documented.

"Documented" your ass. The judge was the signatory because he was filling in for the "duty judge" who was unavailable.

THAT actually HAS been documented

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And that didn't happen here either. The FBI used a legal warrant to recover docs that should have been returned a year and a half ago.

"Documented" your ass. The judge was the signatory because he was filling in for the "duty judge" who was unavailable.

THAT actually HAS been documented

And you don't think the Left-BI planned it that way? I have a bridge for sale in case you're interested. a real judge would have asked why they didn't subpoena the records they were looking for and battle it out in court.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Exactly my point.

It was always a clean bill.

And they still lie about it in spite of the actual bill being posted about 20 times as well as the VFW reviewing it and THAT being posted about ten times.

Because Pat fucking Toomey said....

They never bothered to read the damn bill or even listen to what the VFW had to say.

They just regurgitate nonsense lies...like here

When was the last time the Communist party wrote a clean bill? Name that bill for me. Every bill they write is loaded with pork for their parties benefit, not the American people. And since you know more than a US Senator, show me any reliable source that says he's wrong.

 

[Marener]

The President of the United States is more than just a government official and no, no President has ever had his house raided by the Nazis in our history. Yes, the judge should have recused himself because he had a bias against Trump for some time and that's well documented. Any judge that has a hatred of the person in a case he's asked to handle is obligated to recuse themselves.

I never said the FBI was obligated to allow oversight, but disallowing it raises a lot of questions if they claim to have found something in Mar-A-Lago Trump claims he never had. The FBI has been corrupt at least since the DumBama administration.

It has everything to do with the President running again: two phony impeachments, a 30 million dollar phony Russian collusion investigation, trying to sick the NYC commies on Trump, the bogus so-called 1/6 investigation, and now this. All by design to try and stop Trump from running again.

He’s an ex-president which means he’s a citizen with no special privileges or authorities.

I think the former president should be treated the same as the rest of us. You think he should be held to a different standard.

So what is it? One set of laws or two?