So Hillary DELETES 30,000 emails on Servers Used for Classified Business and Gets Away with it

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
5,204
8,928
2,130
It doesn't matter if she said she didn't know the law, which is bunk. She knows the ins and outs of every nuance of those laws. A US sailor tried that excuse after taking a few unauthorized pictures of his nuclear sub for his kids. He had the book thrown at him. Intent has no role in the laws over classified.
 
It doesn't matter if she said she didn't know the law, which is bunk. She knows the ins and outs of every nuance of those laws. A US sailor tried that excuse after taking a few unauthorized pictures of his nuclear sub for his kids. He had the book thrown at him. Intent has no role in the laws over classified.
Those that know the laws and legal justice system decided that the activity wasn't criminal... This was after an intense investigation and statements made by the FBI director that cost her the election. Trumps AG had the opportunity to press charges if they wanted and they didn't so if you have complaints about her "getting away with it" then you should take it up with them.
 
It doesn't matter if she said she didn't know the law, which is bunk. She knows the ins and outs of every nuance of those laws. A US sailor tried that excuse after taking a few unauthorized pictures of his nuclear sub for his kids. He had the book thrown at him. Intent has no role in the laws over classified.
She also had a dozen phones and computers pulverized that had been subpoenaed by the FBI. Nothing happened to her. The Democrats already had control of the DOJ even before 2016.
 
It doesn't matter if she said she didn't know the law, which is bunk. She knows the ins and outs of every nuance of those laws. A US sailor tried that excuse after taking a few unauthorized pictures of his nuclear sub for his kids. He had the book thrown at him. Intent has no role in the laws over classified.
I wonder why Trump stopped caring about it for all 4 years of his Presidency. Maybe it was an honor among thieves type of thing.
 
Those that know the laws and legal justice system decided that the activity wasn't criminal... This was after an intense investigation and statements made by the FBI director that cost her the election. Trumps AG had the opportunity to press charges if they wanted and they didn't so if you have complaints about her "getting away with it" then you should take it up with them.
Total nonsense. If the FBI had done their job, she would have been disqualified from even running AT A MINIMUM.
 
It doesn't matter if she said she didn't know the law, which is bunk. She knows the ins and outs of every nuance of those laws. A US sailor tried that excuse after taking a few unauthorized pictures of his nuclear sub for his kids. He had the book thrown at him. Intent has no role in the laws over classified.

EVEN MORE appropriate.......

You remember the WhiteWater papers that suddenly showed up over 2 YEARS after subpoena in the Billy Jeff impeachment? That ones' that Hillary SWORE were lost? Suddenly found on random table at the White House?

This is gonna back-fire like EVERY other Dem scheme. Because here's the deal.

FBI never COMPLIED with MULTIPLE subpoenas to turn over early Russia Russia Russia papers. This IS THE OBJECT of the raid. FBI HAS them -- SUPPOSED to go to National Archives like EVERYTHING ELSE DOES. Haven't sent them over.

Trump specifically signaled that these are papers in question by saying "I declassified them and ordered them to be redacted and made public".

WHY? Because FBI does NOT WANT THEM PUBLIC. Does NOT want them to go the Nat Archives.

The RAID was to find out IF -- Trump had sent them to the Nat Archives where they cant be lost or destroyed.


FBI does not KNOW if these papers were in the 12 boxes that Trump SENT to Nat Archives. The ones at Mar a Lago are LEGAL copies of classified info that Trump LEGALLY DECLASSIFIED for public access. (supposed to have been redacted by FBI but couldn't get them to cooperate).

The PUBLIC would LOVE these papers BE PRESERVED. The FBI -=- not so much.


This is gonna get ugly when the truth is out. Because -- the FBI are the CRIMINALS refusing to turn over those documents. They have the originals. All the dirt about the dossier and who knew what and all the FOREIGN OPERATIONS where Trump people were played and induced to England and other EU countries to be spied on and dined by hot women at will.

Gonna make Trump look like a genius and a hero. And I salute him for preserving those documents.
 
It doesn't matter if she said she didn't know the law, which is bunk. She knows the ins and outs of every nuance of those laws. A US sailor tried that excuse after taking a few unauthorized pictures of his nuclear sub for his kids. He had the book thrown at him. Intent has no role in the laws over classified.
But didn't you get the memo?

Trump is LITERALLY Hitler.

ANYTHING goes.

If the country is thrown into civil war, well, that's just the price that has to be paid.

Not by the elites who caused it, of course.

Rich mans' cause, poor mans' fight, as ever.
 
FBI was supposed to turn these over to NARA YEARS AGO. The excuse has been "ongoing investigations", but some of these date back to 2015. Apparently, EVEN the most SENSITIVE FBI matters have a place at NARA.

 
Those that know the laws and legal justice system decided that the activity wasn't criminal... This was after an intense investigation and statements made by the FBI director that cost her the election. Trumps AG had the opportunity to press charges if they wanted and they didn't so if you have complaints about her "getting away with it" then you should take it up with them.
Criminals ruled another criminal did not commit a crime even though the law specifically defined the crime and the action was criminal
 

Forum List

Back
Top