After watching the debate between the communist and criminal (for 2 minutes).........

[Unkotare]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are spot on!

1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
   1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
   2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
   3. “They're for the powerful,we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! “The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin [p. 8]
   1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).

i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.

i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
   1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions…The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” Washingtonpost.com: Scaife: Funding Father of the Right

The rich called fdr a traitor to his class. .

That fucking scumbag fdr was a traitor to AMERICA.

This is why I believe you are Asian

Unsurprisingly, you are wrong again, fish.

 

[Arianrhod]

Every thread I start conclusively shows why all left wing losers are demented piles of shit and whyn there I hate them.

This thread especially.

Then why start these threads? You're already profoundly unhappy with life. Why exacerbate your own misery?

Take heart in that Officers Cruz and Espeut appreciate your concern.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are spot on!

1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
   1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
   2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
   3. “They're for the powerful,we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! “The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin [p. 8]
   1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).

i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.

i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
   1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions…The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” Washingtonpost.com: Scaife: Funding Father of the Right

The rich called fdr a traitor to his class. What's that make you?

Oprah is a traitor to her class. Carson is a traitor to his race and forgot where he came from.

Not all rich people are greedy mean and stupid.

If it weren't for social wedge issues the GOP would offer you nothing.

Republicans say both parties are corrupt. So they realize the rich own both sides.

"The rich called fdr a traitor to his class. What's that make you?"

1. It makes me rich. Unbelievably so.

2. Don't believe all the propaganda attempts to defend the dictator-wannabe, Roosevelt.

He attacked the producers from the start...until reality forced him to grovel to same.

"He started off on the wrong foot when, in his inaugural address, he blamed the Depression on “unscrupulous money changers.” He said nothing about the role of the Fed’s mismanagement and little about the follies of Congress that had contributed to the problem. As a result of his efforts, the economy would linger in depression for the rest of the decade."
Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


But as Dr. Hans Sennholz of Grove City College explains, it was FDR’s policies to come that Americans had genuine reason to fear: In his first 100 days, he swung hard at the profit order. Instead of clearing away the prosperity barriers erected by his predecessor, he built new ones of his own. He struck in every known way at the integrity of the U.S. dollar through quantitative increases and qualitative deterioration. He seized the people’s gold holdings and subsequently devalued the dollar by 40 percent.
Hans F. Sennholz, “The Great Depression,” The Freeman, April 1975, p. 210.

If you are rich, do not tell us we are wrong for not voting like you do, you fucking dummy. PS. Liar.

Wanna know how rich?
Here...let me tell you, as your vulgarity indicates how deeply it irks you:


There's a great story about Rodgers and Hammerstein in London in...
“They walked through Berkeley Square on their way to lunch in some swank restaurant in Mayfair. They passed this Rolls-Royce dealer and there were two identical white ...Rolls-Royces in the window.

A couple of hours later, as they strolled back through the square, they went into the showroom for a better look.

They decided to buy the two Rolls. Hammerstein reached into his pocket for his checkbook, but Rodgers said, 'No, no, let me get these. You got lunch." Michael Sloan, "The Equilizer," p.471-2

That rich.



Be sure to ask me how we became so rich.

 

[Arianrhod]

The genuinely wealthy never refer to themselves as "rich."

 

[PoliticalChic]

The genuinely wealthy never refer to themselves as "rich."

How would you know what we discuss, you peasant?

 

[Arianrhod]

The genuinely wealthy never refer to themselves as "rich."

How would you know what we discuss, you peasant?

How would you know I'm a peasant? According to the OP, all liberals are "rich."

You two should coordinate your talking points.

 

[basquebromance]

Shit I hate progressive Nazis.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every thread I start conclusively shows why all left wing losers are demented piles of shit and whyn there I hate them.

This thread especially.

Then why start these threads? You're already profoundly unhappy with life. Why exacerbate your own misery?

Take heart in that Officers Cruz and Espeut appreciate your concern.

The genuinely wealthy never refer to themselves as "rich."

How would you know what we discuss, you peasant?

How would you know I'm a peasant? According to the OP, all liberals are "rich."

You two should coordinate your talking points.

1. Nowhere does the OP say " all liberals are "rich."

2. "How would you know I'm a peasant?"
Because you said "wealthy never refer to themselves as "rich."

I believe Trump has trumpeted his wealth numerous time...and he is 'wealthy.'

Clearly, you are a clueless peasant.

Now...back into the mines, you!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Shit I hate progressive Nazis.

In the strictest sense, "progressive Nazis" is redundant.
Both follow this dictate: "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual")

But, I appreciate your sense of priorities.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Arianrhod]

I believe Trump has trumpeted his wealth numerous time...and he is 'wealthy.'

"TRUMPeted," indeed. Trump is one generation removed from nouveau. He should realize that pretending to be a populist is only fooling those dazzled by his gold-plated personality. His peers are smirking behind his back.

 

[candycorn]

Every thread I start conclusively shows why all left wing losers are demented piles of shit and why i hate them.

This thread especially.

Every thread you start shows you are a pile of shit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I believe Trump has trumpeted his wealth numerous time...and he is 'wealthy.'

"TRUMPeted," indeed. Trump is one generation removed from nouveau. He should realize that pretending to be a populist is only fooling those dazzled by his gold-plated personality. His peers are smirking behind his back.

I note that I have cured you of denying that you are a peasant.

And, as such, you were born to follow the orders of your betters.\

Excellent.



As your reward for knowing your place....I will give you a pointer, the path we began on our quest for the immense wealth we've attained.

Early on, we had a simple petting zoo....for folks who like animals.
Then we expanded, opened a 'heavy petting zoo' for Liberals who really like animals.
The rest, as they say, is economic history.

 

[candycorn]

Jumbo is off her meds.

 

[jillian]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

*snip imbecile's memes.*

you're kind of a moron, so i won't bother with an explanation.

she's not a criminal. he isn't a communist.

you're just a braindead troll.

 

[Arianrhod]

I believe Trump has trumpeted his wealth numerous time...and he is 'wealthy.'

"TRUMPeted," indeed. Trump is one generation removed from nouveau. He should realize that pretending to be a populist is only fooling those dazzled by his gold-plated personality. His peers are smirking behind his back.

I note that I have cured you of denying that you are a peasant.

And, as such, you were born to follow the orders of your betters.\

Excellent.



As your reward for knowing your place....I will give you a pointer, the path we began on our quest for the immense wealth we've attained.

Early on, we had a simple petting zoo....for folks who like animals.
Then we expanded, opened a 'heavy petting zoo' for Liberals who really like animals.
The rest, as they say, is economic history.

What a lovely on-topic post! Do some more.

 

[imawhosure]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

*snip imbecile's memes.*

you're kind of a moron, so i won't bother with an explanation.

she's not a criminal. he isn't a communist.

you're just a braindead troll.

Ok, ok, he did embellish a little.

1. She is not a criminal; she was an incompetent Secretary of State who didn't know how to handle sensitive material who could be prosecuted for her own stupidity.

2. No, he is not a Communist, he is a self proclaimed Democratic, Socialist.

As most of us have always said...... Democrat and Socialist are one and the same as Bernie admits to without reservation.

There, are you happy now-). A conservative like me, partially agreed with you, and helped clarify the situation! See, we all can agree on something, and thanks for the opportunity to show bi-partisanship-)

 

[LogikAndReazon]

20 % down , excellent credit, verifiable income =
Discrimination !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lmfao

 

[Billy000]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

Lol whoever expressed anger that Romney is worth 250 million? These are just stupid assumptions you people get in your heads because it validates your narrow mindedness. Liberals, including Bernie, do not want to put an end to the wealthy class. We just want them to stop using loopholes and tax havens so their effective tax rate isn't next to zero.

 

[Theowl32]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

Lol whoever expressed anger that Romney is worth 250 million? These are just stupid assumptions you people get in your heads because it validates your narrow mindedness. Liberals, including Bernie, do not want to put an end to the wealthy class. We just want them to stop using loopholes and tax havens so their effective tax rate isn't next to zero.

That is what makes people like you an idiot. First of all, who do you think contributes mass amounts of money to these parties and campaigns? Hmmmmm? The poor? The middle class? Oh the poor vote, but they contribute nothing as far as money.

Second of all, who do you think makes legislative decisions? Poor people? No, the makers are by and large rich. You don't think loopholes will always be there? Wake up. All of that type of rhetoric is to Seduce the gullible and naive voting base.

Wake the hell up. Also, not all loopholes are bad things.

Bernie Sanders and the socialist liberation theology have been utter disasters.

Research and see why so many from those countries are desperately trying to get out of those countries.