After this...

[JohnDB]

Inconvenient facts....buried facts....they are the hallmarks of an oppressive regime.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

"If you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?"

-Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice

It is much better written in the original Klingon.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

"The reality is he grew up in Utah, he grew up in the United States. He's a product of these places."

Apparently, he grew up here but was corrupted by the Internet.

 

[MarcATL]

I'll put this simply, Marc.

You become my enemy when you point a gun at me and try to kill me. When you try to kill people of like mind as myself, you become my enemy. You become a threat, not because I wanted you to be a threat, but because you made yourself one.

Understand?

I understand that you've lost your motherfucking mind.

One person did a shooting, a white, male, conservative, raised in a deeply red, religous and gun-loving state.

But you're online whipping yourself up into a hate-rage against what you perceive as "the left."

**** you and your feelings.

Understand?

 

[Foxfyre]

You are a kind soul. I appreciate the insight.

But I feel like I'm in some sort of... political purgatory.

I can definitely understand and empathize with that. But I do embrace the two party system. The GOP is certainly imperfect and has at times been feckless, but they have demonstrated a new courage and resolve of late in embracing the MAGA vision of a strong, secure, free, prosperous America for all.

They are all we have to counter a dangerous and destructive neo-Marxist determined left who reject pretty much everything that made this the greatest nation on Earth. So we need to get behind the GOP and encourage them to do the right thing for America and Americans. The Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they won't do that.

But Charlie Kirk's legacy was to promote good, kindness, charity while not compromising our convictions, values, beliefs. We have some work to do to get some of our fellows to embrace that and promoting justice instead of vengeance.

 

[kyzr]

I understand that you've lost your motherfucking mind. But you're online whipping yourself up into a hate-rage against what you perceive as "the left." **** you and your feelings.

Tyler Robinson's text messages and etchings on the bullets describe a radical leftist.
The fact that Ilhan Omar and others are still pushing the "hate narrative" lie says it all.

One person did a shooting, a white, male, conservative, raised in a deeply red, religious and gun-loving state.

Tyler was not a conservative. He was living with a male transsexual. He was registered indy but had not voted.
His political views were left leaning, the furthest possible from Charlie Kirk, the very religious married man with two kids that Tyler murdered.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Actually, his mother did. His trans boyfriend, and his romantic attachment to him, did.

What did Kirk say to set off the shooter?

 

[Lisa558]

What did Kirk say to set off the shooter?

Nothing. The killer has already decided he was a fascist by what leftists kept calling him. That was enough to set him off.

 

[BlindBoo]

But Charlie Kirk's legacy was to promote good, kindness, charity while not compromising our convictions, values, beliefs.

Not really. His deification should be cancelled. First he shouldn't have been murdered for anything he said. But he wasn't above making fun of a man who was brutally attacked with a hammer and furthering a sick narrative for political purposes.

“Why has he not been bailed out?” Kirk said Monday on his podcast of the man who allegedly beat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi‘s husband Paul with a hammer last Friday. “By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out, I bet his bail’s like thirty or forty thousand bucks.” With a smirk, he added: “Bail him out and then go ask him some questions.”

He wasn't alone is pushing that disgusting false narrative. Why did they do it?

Charlie Kirk Says a 'Patriot' Should Bail Out Alleged Paul Pelosi Attacker

Charlie Kirk wants a "patriot" to bail the man who allegedly beat Paul Pelosi with a hammer out of jail.

www.rollingstone.com

Because DePape had a history of blogging about far-right ideas and even dabbled in QAnon conspiracy theories, the GOP has scrambled to deny that this was an attempted assassination of a leading Democrat. Some have gone as far as peddling a conspiracy theory of their own. An “opinion” piece in the fake news publication the Santa Monica Observer falsely claimed that DePape was a sex worker hired by Pelosi and the two had gotten into a physical dispute. The piece was amplified by, among others, Elon Musk, who later deleted his tweeted link without explanation or apology.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Nothing. The killer has already decided he was a fascist by what leftists kept calling him. That was enough to set him off.

It was reported he did not like some of Kirk's views.

 

[Lisa558]

It was reported he did not like some of Kirk's views.

It went way beyond that. He thought Kirk was a fascist. And that’s because the Democrats kept demonizing him with that word.

He carved “Fascist! Catch this” into one of the bullets.

 

[Foxfyre]

Not really. His deification should be cancelled. First he shouldn't have been murdered for anything he said. But he wasn't above making fun of a man who was brutally attacked with a hammer and furthering a sick narrative for political purposes.

“Why has he not been bailed out?” Kirk said Monday on his podcast of the man who allegedly beat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi‘s husband Paul with a hammer last Friday. “By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out, I bet his bail’s like thirty or forty thousand bucks.” With a smirk, he added: “Bail him out and then go ask him some questions.”

He wasn't alone is pushing that disgusting false narrative. Why did they do it?

Charlie Kirk Says a 'Patriot' Should Bail Out Alleged Paul Pelosi Attacker

Charlie Kirk wants a "patriot" to bail the man who allegedly beat Paul Pelosi with a hammer out of jail.

www.rollingstone.com

Because DePape had a history of blogging about far-right ideas and even dabbled in QAnon conspiracy theories, the GOP has scrambled to deny that this was an attempted assassination of a leading Democrat. Some have gone as far as peddling a conspiracy theory of their own. An “opinion” piece in the fake news publication the Santa Monica Observer falsely claimed that DePape was a sex worker hired by Pelosi and the two had gotten into a physical dispute. The piece was amplified by, among others, Elon Musk, who later deleted his tweeted link without explanation or apology.

How about including the context if you are going to condemn, criticize, impune someone's character.

Snopes hates hates HATES to defend conservatives, but at least they included the entire clip in its full context. I would have a lot more respect for those on the left if they could just once report something honestly instead of via Democrat hateful propaganda.

The accurately reported remark, when included in full context, was obviously made tongue in cheek within the context of metaphor to illustrate the massive double standard of justice that exists in leftists' circles.

Charlie Kirk called for an 'amazing patriot' to bail out Paul Pelosi's attacker in 2022

Kirk also said he thought the attack was "awful."

www.snopes.com

 

[Zincwarrior]

It went way beyond that. He thought Kirk was a fascist.

Which means in this context?

And that’s because the Democrats kept demonizing him with that word.

Evidence?

 

[Quantrill]

You, and your ilk, are whipping yourselves into a hate-driven frenzy at your perceived political enemies.

Notice how no one, nominally, or otherwise, on the left is speaking like this.

Morever, the FBI just released a report that they have found NOTHING, I repeat, NOTHING linking the shooter to "the left."

Charlie was killed by a white male w/a gun that was raised in a deeply red state, deeply rightwing conservative family, a deeply religious area of the country.

Yet, your inner hatred is driving you to demonize and attack the left, because "feelings."

Stop while you're behind.

Which is proof that ones own family doesn't mean all turn out the same.

Remember Cain and Abel? It's in the old Book.

Quantrill

 

[BlindBoo]

It went way beyond that. He thought Kirk was a fascist. And that’s because the Democrats kept demonizing him with that word.

He carved “Fascist! Catch this” into one of the bullets.

Rush Limbaugh called Democrats, Feminist, Environmentalist, almost every group he singled out for hate, he call them a combination of fascist nazis commies, socialist...ect. decades ago.....ElRushbo normalized those phrases, and they made their way into the Neo-GOP vernacular when the Dirty Don took over as party boss. Rush got a medal for contributions like that too. Being a fascist, nazis, commies, or a socialist, most 'ishes, should not carry a death sentence regardless.

Cold bloodied murder should.

 

[BlindBoo]

How about including the context if you are going to condemn, criticize, impune someone's character.

Snopes hates hates HATES to defend conservatives, but at least they included the entire clip in its full context. I would have a lot more respect for those on the left if they could just once report something honestly instead of via Democrat hateful propaganda.

The accurately reported remark, when included in full context, was obviously made tongue in cheek within the context of metaphor to illustrate the massive double standard of justice that exists in leftists' circles.

Charlie Kirk called for an 'amazing patriot' to bail out Paul Pelosi's attacker in 2022

Kirk also said he thought the attack was "awful."

www.snopes.com

Nonsense. The context snopes provided made him look worse.

So you're okay now with tounge in cheek jokes about Mr. Kirk?

 

[Foxfyre]

Nonsense. The context snopes provided made him look worse.

So you're okay now with tounge in cheek jokes about Mr. Kirk?

Sorry you still need that remedial reading comprehension/listening course. But you go right on hating and misrepresenting Charlie Kirk if that make you feel good. I personally think that is pretty pitiful, but have a lovely afternoon.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Well, you could stand up and be heard. You could push for the change that is necessary.

You could educate yourself on what can be done.

And you could stand up and be heard, by telling your side, the ones who have historically been in the streets causing violence, that what they have been doing for decades is the wrong approach.

 

[BlindBoo]

Sorry you still need that remedial reading comprehension/listening course. But you go right on hating and misrepresenting Charlie Kirk if that make you feel good. I personally think that is pretty pitiful, but have a lovely afternoon.

There is no doubt he was making light of the tragedy in San Francisco and used it to try and score political points. But he lied about the cashless bond situation in San Fran. Murderers and violent offenders do not get the chance at cashless bail, but you wouldn't know that listening to Mr. Kirk. If that makes you feel good about him, I don't care. He didn't deserve to have his life ended that way over it.

 

[marvin martian]

You, and your ilk, are whipping yourselves into a hate-driven frenzy at your perceived political enemies.

Notice how no one, nominally, or otherwise, on the left is speaking like this.

Morever, the FBI just released a report that they have found NOTHING, I repeat, NOTHING linking the shooter to "the left."

Charlie was killed by a white male w/a gun that was raised in a deeply red state, deeply rightwing conservative family, a deeply religious area of the country.

Yet, your inner hatred is driving you to demonize and attack the left, because "feelings."

Stop while you're behind.

The left isn't speaking, you're shooting.