After this...

Bunches of Trans or illegal supporter or anti-Cop, Anti-Israel, free Palestine recent unprovoked shooters, yet the stupid lying hogs fill the boards insisting RW extremists MAGA did it.

All of them. Perhaps a token avoidance by the PKK people is observed? Its them that are the issue.

We are almost always right, they are wrong or lying. If wrong, we admit it. They? Lol! Not a chance. Mushy middle too. Never Trumper middlers or Lincoln project filth killing the Country.
 
The sad truth if they can face it is that people who claim to not believe in the two party (or more) system are usually democrats who no longer believe in their own party but are too cowardly to become republicans.
 
These anarchist POS professors are nothing new. Poisoning youth back to that Churchill commee DIC in COL making headlines.
 
OK... how do we get the liberals to stop?
It's very simple and easy.

Inciting violence, even if it is political rhetoric, is a crime.

PROSECUTE THEM.

It's not like it never has not been a crime. It's been a while since a prosecutor actually prosecuted the crime of inciting violence.

But it is and has been.

And those prosecutors that are elected....unless they campaign on THAT specific issue....do not vote for them.

It's a national law in every state in the union. (States and cities have jurisdiction unless it's a federal public figure then the Secret Service has jurisdiction) You are not allowed to threaten anyone, anywhere, and in any manner you want to.

But for whatever reason, since Bill Clinton was in office the crime has been ignored.

Make inciting violence a crime again.
 
The Dirty Media caused riots back 60 years without penalty. So the Political scum are OK with it or lazy and incompetent?
 
Last edited:
This is why LEADERSHIP is important....
Into what are you being led into?


 
The sad truth if they can face it is that people who claim to not believe in the two party (or more) system are usually democrats who no longer believe in their own party but are too cowardly to become republicans.


Seeing so many "R" in Congress like TomCollins murky Turtle mittens kitzinger flakey chainey.....Uniparty scum. I don't have any quick solutions. They get in. They stay in like phony middlers as you point out, all DEM.
 
After this, after I saw the service, how Erika conquered sorrow itself to deliver a message of forgiveness, how she pleaded for unity, I couldn't take it anymore. I am a conservative, but a political atheist. I don't believe in a two-party system; however, I find that my views constantly draw the ire of the political left. The same political left that spawned the assassin who killed Charlie Kirk. After what has transpired, I have been radicalized. I find that this is a battle I cannot avoid. I don't go looking for a battle to fight, but I feel this battle has found me. I feel, as a conservative, something stirring within me. I want to fight back in my own way, conquer this senseless violence with the gifts I have been given. Not with fists or guns, but with speech and intelligence. With raw facts and reality. With brains, not brawn.

All I ever wanted for America was for her citizens to get along, but I fear that time may have long since passed. Can I be a political pacifist anymore? Can I sit idly by while others fight for their beliefs in the political arena? I feel like I can no longer run from this anymore.

The old saying goes: "It is better to be a warrior in a garden than a gardener in a war." Though I wouldn't qualify this as a war... yet. I never wanted to be anyone's enemy, but on the left, they insist on making me one. So be it. If they wish to wage a political fight, one done with words instead of bullets, so be it. I am here. The gauntlet is thrown.

After this, there can be given no quarter to those who insist on violence to quell the speech of those they disagree with. I will be as Charlie was, a challenger, a debater, and a God fearing conservative.

May God rest your soul, Charlie.
Judging by the direction and tenor of the thread, it looks like all you managed to do here was incite a riot.
 
Conquering pride and wrath is challenging because they are deeply rooted emotions tied to self-identity and ego. They can cloud judgment and provoke defensive reactions, making it difficult to recognize their effects. Additionally, societal influences often encourage these traits, complicating self-awareness and change. :)


👉 Regarding Charlie Kirk and the victims of January 6 political violence, analyzing key sins from the Christian framework of the seven deadly sins that may have played roles is a complex task rooted in understanding motivations and consequences behind these events.

Charlie Kirk was a prominent conservative activist closely involved in mobilizing support for Donald Trump and organizing transportation of supporters to the January 6, 2021, Capitol event, which turned violent. He also spread misinformation about the 2020 election and advocated combative political stances. He was assassinated in 2025 during a public event.

Key deadly sins that could be seen as influencing such scenarios down below:

Pride: Kirk’s and his movement’s strong self-righteousness and political zeal can be linked to pride, an excessive belief in one’s own righteousness and superiority, often blinding to other viewpoints or consequences.

Wrath: The violent outbreak on January 6 itself reflects wrath—anger and aggression culminating in destructive behavior.

Envy: Political conflicts often involve envy of power, status, or influence, motivating divisiveness.

Greed: Could be relevant in terms of political power and control aspirations.

Lust and gluttony are less directly obvious in this context.

Sloth might relate indirectly to passivity or failure to seek peace but is less prominent.

👉 The sin of pride appears particularly prominent both in the political violence context and in the motivations behind such divisiveness, as it drives unyielding positions and escalates conflicts. Wrath is embodied in the violent actions and hostility during the January 6 riot. Kirk’s role in spreading misinformation and mobilizing supporters for a disputed cause also reflects pride and wrath elements.

In summary, pride and wrath are likely the key deadly sins playing major roles in the context of Charlie Kirk’s involvement and the broader political violence surrounding January 6, reflecting internal and external forces that led to tragic outcomes.newsweek+3

sources:

1. Charlie Kirk pleads the Fifth when asked his age by Jan. ...
2. Charlie Kirk, who helped build support for Trump among young people, killed at age 31
3. Charlie Kirk - Wikipedia
4. Charlie Kirk's influence, reach helped propel Donald Trump into office
5. Charlie Kirk: How a teenage activist became such a close Trump ally
6. FBI's 'Arctic Frost' probe into Jan. 6 investigated Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA
7. Extremist Groups Hated Charlie Kirk. They’re Using His Death to Radicalize Others
8. How Charlie Kirk rose from a teenage activist to a MAGA star
 
The left has demonstrated its willingness to use bullets to settle arguments with people they disagree with.
Must we? We can defend against violence with violence, but not use violence to further our goals, can't we?
 
TemplarKormac, your intellect, sound judgment, and ability to expertly communicate your mind and heart, has always, and will always be, a breath of fresh air to me, regardless of the temperature I sense in your posts. You are a thoughtful and well-reasoned person; a true asset to USMB. May you stay steady in your quest. And once again, THANK YOU. 🪷
Much appreciated, madam.
 
You, and your ilk, are whipping yourselves into a hate-driven frenzy at your perceived political enemies.
I'll put this simply, Marc.

You become my enemy when you point a gun at me and try to kill me. When you try to kill people of like mind as myself, you become my enemy. You become a threat, not because I wanted you to be a threat, but because you made yourself one.

Understand?
 
Horseshit. You've always been a hater and an idiot. Nothing has changed.

Hey, what did you think of the vigil being a gun-free zone? Shouldn't everyone be allowed to carry since that makes us all safer? Gun-free zones just invite bad guys with guns. Just ask Charlie Kirk.

A gun-free zone. Did we not learn anything from this?

Charlie Kirk must be spinning in his grave.
Geez. Use the dead as a tool to push an irrelevant point. Go figure, g5.

What did you think of the killer? Nothing? Because it doesn't further your narrative, does it?
 
15th post
I too am one that heard and embraced a ministry of love and compassion without compromising or giving up our convictions of values and concepts that promote a strong, free, secure, prosperous America where people can live in peace and harmony.

We are not required to accept what is wrong, bad, evil in order to achieve harmony. We should resist what is wrong, bad, evil, harmful at all times. We should call out what is wrong, bad, evil, harmful wherever it exists.

But instead of attacking, insulting, demonizing those who oppose what is good, decent, right, beneficial, we should use logic, reason, facts, persuasion to change him/her.

I honestly am not quite there yet. I bitterly resent the hate and evil that has been directed at Charlie Kirk and those who loves and respected him. But I am working on getting there.
You are a kind soul. I appreciate the insight.

But I feel like I'm in some sort of... political purgatory.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom