After They Illegaly Remove President Trump, Courts Begin to Rule

[Carl in Michigan]

How convenient. Yes Virginia there really is a Deep State

Judge: Virginia can't count some ballots without postmarks

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A judge ruled Wednesday that Virginia elections officials cannot count absentee ballots with missing postmarks unless they can confirm the date of mailing through a barcode, granting part of an injunction requested by a conservative legal group.

apnews.com

 

[BULLDOG]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

 

[progressive hunter]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

 

[BULLDOG]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

how many?

 

[progressive hunter]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

how many?

doesnt matter,,,

but considering it had to go to court it had to be a lot of them,,,

 

[BULLDOG]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

how many?

doesnt matter,,,

but considering it had to go to court it had to be a lot of them,,,

Nope. Get someone to read the article to you.

 

[Rambunctious]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

Until you can prove it to be crazy... its just your opinion....

 

[progressive hunter]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

how many?

doesnt matter,,,

but considering it had to go to court it had to be a lot of them,,,

Nope. Get someone to read the article to you.

so you dont know how many,,,

 

[BULLDOG]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

how many?

doesnt matter,,,

but considering it had to go to court it had to be a lot of them,,,

Nope. Get someone to read the article to you.

so you dont know how many,,,

I asked you. You give up?

 

[Concerned American]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

Lefties always avoid the truth. Gee, it's only 40 or so days into the illegal occupation of the white house. The rest of the next four years is going to be really rough on you.

 

[progressive hunter]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

how many?

doesnt matter,,,

but considering it had to go to court it had to be a lot of them,,,

Nope. Get someone to read the article to you.

so you dont know how many,,,

I asked you. You give up?

I never claimed to know,, just that it had to be a lot if it went to court,,,

 

[jillian]

How convenient. Yes Virginia there really is a Deep State

Judge: Virginia can't count some ballots without postmarks

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A judge ruled Wednesday that Virginia elections officials cannot count absentee ballots with missing postmarks unless they can confirm the date of mailing through a barcode, granting part of an injunction requested by a conservative legal group.

apnews.com

Who was removed?

Your loser was voted out of office. Now stfu

 

[jillian]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

Trumpkins are batshit crazy

 

[BULLDOG]

How many threads are you gonna start about that batshit crazy article?

you consider a court ruling to be batshit crazy???

might be because it exposes unlawful votes,,,,

how many?

doesnt matter,,,

but considering it had to go to court it had to be a lot of them,,,

Nope. Get someone to read the article to you.

so you dont know how many,,,

I asked you. You give up?

I never claimed to know,, just that it had to be a lot if it went to court,,,

see #6