What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

After the FBI's Trump Raid, Don't Take the Bait

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
29,142
Reaction score
17,753
Points
1,445
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
Or they wouldn't have executed the unprecedented act if they didn't know they could steal the midterms.
I hope you are wrong... But I wouldn't put anything past these criminal democrats today..
 

MagicMike

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2021
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
583
Points
928
Location
New Mexico

After the FBI's Trump Raid, Don't Take the Bait

8 Aug 2022 ~~ By Bonchie

On Monday evening, the FBI took the unprecedented step of raiding the home of former President Donald Trump. What were they looking for? Astonishingly, what is being leaked to the media is that they were after documents that possibly violated the Presidential Records Act.
~Snip~
None of this is a coincidence, and none of it is justified. Even if Trump was in possession of some documents that needed to be archived, that is the kind of thing that has historically been dealt with in court, not with an FBI raid, and the former president was fully cooperating to this point.
Meanwhile, Hunter Biden has been implicated in multiple federal crimes and his house hasn’t been raided. Hillary Clinton was proven to have illegally retained classified information on a private server, and her house was never raided. This isn’t about Trump not being above the law, as some on the right have naively proclaimed. It’s about a completely different set of rules being applied depending on what political ideology someone adheres to. In simpler terms, it’s about blatant corruption.
Further, it’s about baiting the trap.
~Snip~
Now is not the time to play into the hands of our opponents, and you will not beat the FBI and these other corrupt institutions via disorganized attacks from the outside, no matter how good it might feel in the short term. A red line was crossed with this raid on Trump’s home, and electoral vengeance is justified. But it must come in ways that are actually effective, and that means being strategic and playing the long game. It’s going to take a Republican Congress in 2023 and a Republican president in 2025 to make any headway against this insanity. There is no other way, and once the tables are turned, any Republican politician who doesn’t have the stomach to fight back must be banished.

Commentary:
Hmm...., Anyone remember Sandy “burglar” Berger at the National Archives?
When it turns out the FBI planted evidence (as they have done in the past), these people will tell us to let the system handle it.
President Trump WILL BE charged by Progressive Maoist Democrats with something before November. It will not make a difference because the presidential election will not be until November 2024.
It won’t matter when they don’t have anything to go on from this raid.......they will fabricate evidence.
Remember, “BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY”
There will be a resounding RED WAVE that engulfs Democrats in November.
Be there! The January 6 Pogroms will stop, Biden’s ‘laws’ stop, and Garland and Wray better be preserving documents because they’ve already been warned their days are coming in a New House, likely a New Senate and New Congress, too.
YAWN
 

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,468
Reaction score
1,505
Points
163
They just played a montage of the MSM's new line: Trump is not above the law. Is Hunter above the law? Was Hillary above the law? I don't recall the search warrants to her computers. How is it she forwarded classified material to her aid's laptop, the same one that her husband was using to send gross nude pictures of himself to strange women all over the world?
Clinton was thoroughly investigated. Hunter is being investigated now.

Trump is also under investigation.

It would be presumptuous to say Trump was cooperating. A search warrant would be an indication he wasn’t.
 

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
35,780
Reaction score
29,091
Points
2,900
 

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
35,780
Reaction score
29,091
Points
2,900

“Thank God it’s Donald Trump quite frankly because nobody else could withstand this kind of pressure, the pressure during the campaign, during the presidency, the fake impeachments, the Russia hoax, Jan. 6 investigations… and now this.”​

 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
88,226
Reaction score
30,210
Points
2,290
Clinton was thoroughly investigated. Hunter is being investigated now.

Trump is also under investigation.

It would be presumptuous to say Trump was cooperating. A search warrant would be an indication he wasn’t.

The Left-BI loves to play these games. It's like when they called CNN cameras over to record an arrest in the middle of the night of an old guy in his underwear. They had access to all 15 boxes of those documents anytime they wanted. In fact after looking at them, they advised Trump to have them locked up which he did. it won't happen until next year when we take leadership, but a lot of people are going to have to come up with answers to a lot of questions.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
29,142
Reaction score
17,753
Points
1,445
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
The Left-BI loves to play these games. It's like when they called CNN cameras over to record an arrest in the middle of the night of an old guy in his underwear. They had access to all 15 boxes of those documents anytime they wanted. In fact after looking at them, they advised Trump to have them locked up which he did. it won't happen until next year when we take leadership, but a lot of people are going to have to come up with answers to a lot of questions.
Rumors on the Hill indicate the FBI had compromising material they were actually looking for. IF this is true, the whole warrant was a sham. A ruse to find things that prove criminality of the FBI in other Trump related investigations where they made up evidence. Whistleblowers say they did not have probable cause, and this was a ruse to recover papers (evidence of criminality) that would be used against them in the coming congress.

This thing is blowing up in democrat and deep state faces... Rank and File agents are pissed about what the criminals at the top are doing to their agency.
 

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,468
Reaction score
1,505
Points
163
The Left-BI loves to play these games. It's like when they called CNN cameras over to record an arrest in the middle of the night of an old guy in his underwear. They had access to all 15 boxes of those documents anytime they wanted. In fact after looking at them, they advised Trump to have them locked up which he did. it won't happen until next year when we take leadership, but a lot of people are going to have to come up with answers to a lot of questions.
You’re making things up. There’s nothing that says they had access to all 15 boxes.

I don’t know what you think the role of Congress is, but they have no part in these decisions in the FBI and DoJ. I can’t think of a dumber idea than letting politicians run the show.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
29,142
Reaction score
17,753
Points
1,445
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
You’re making things up. There’s nothing that says they had access to all 15 boxes.

I don’t know what you think the role of Congress is, but they have no part in these decisions in the FBI and DoJ. I can’t think of a dumber idea than letting politicians run the show.
Were you asleep in March when it was being discussed and agreements were made with the National Archives? You really should shut up about things your ignorant of.
 

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,468
Reaction score
1,505
Points
163
Were you asleep in March when it was being discussed and agreements were made with the National Archives? You really should shut up about things your ignorant of.
And what information do we have that indicates those agreements were either truthful or fully cooperated with?

Zilch.

You should shut up before you embarrass yourself further.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
88,226
Reaction score
30,210
Points
2,290
You’re making things up. There’s nothing that says they had access to all 15 boxes.

I don’t know what you think the role of Congress is, but they have no part in these decisions in the FBI and DoJ. I can’t think of a dumber idea than letting politicians run the show.

The role Congress has is to look into inappropriate matters of the FBI and DOJ like invading the home of a former President for the first time in history. You know, like the commies are doing with this phony dog and pony show of 1/6? They may even drag in this magistrate to find out why he signed off on these warrants.
 

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,468
Reaction score
1,505
Points
163
The role Congress has is to look into inappropriate matters of the FBI and DOJ like invading the home of a former President for the first time in history. You know, like the commies are doing with this phony dog and pony show of 1/6? They may even drag in this magistrate to find out why he signed off on these warrants.
There’s nothing inherently inappropriate about executing a search warrant or a former president unless you view former presidents to be exempt from investigation by law enforcement.
 

BluesLegend

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
61,220
Reaction score
32,140
Points
2,645
Location
Trump's Army
There’s nothing inherently inappropriate about executing a search warrant or a former president unless you view former presidents to be exempt from investigation by law enforcement.
Except that it's never been done for this reason in the entire history of the country. Was it really necessary for FBI agents with loaded semi automatic rifles to show up at the home of a POTUS to retrieve some documents? Dems really f'ed up this time. The American people won't stand for this abuse of power and attempt to intimidate a former POTUS from running again in 2024.

All you goose stepping Dem Nazi's rot in hell!
 

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,468
Reaction score
1,505
Points
163
Except that it's never been done for this reason in the entire history of the country. Was it really necessary for FBI agents with loaded semi automatic rifles to show up at the home of a POTUS to retrieve some documents? Dems really f'ed up this time. The American people won't stand for this abuse of power and attempt to intimidate a former POTUS from running again in 2024.

All you goose stepping Dem Nazi's rot in hell!
Can you show me a picture of FBI agents showing up with loaded semiautomatic rifles? (Oh, and how dare they show up with semiautomatics when standard protocol is for bolt action!).

The FBI executes search warrants on Americans all the time. Don’t be so hysterical.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
42,785
Reaction score
37,394
Points
3,615
Can you show me a picture of FBI agents showing up with loaded semiautomatic rifles? (Oh, and how dare they show up with semiautomatics when standard protocol is for bolt action!).

The FBI executes search warrants on Americans all the time. Don’t be so hysterical.
They showed up with the same guns your Vegetable Messiah wants to ban for the rest of us, Simp.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
88,226
Reaction score
30,210
Points
2,290
The FBI executes search warrants on Americans all the time.

Only for people on the right, but never for any of the commies.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
88,226
Reaction score
30,210
Points
2,290
There’s nothing inherently inappropriate about executing a search warrant or a former president unless you view former presidents to be exempt from investigation by law enforcement.

Keep that in mind for the future when we do the same with Dementia.
 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
18,815
Reaction score
19,218
Points
2,288
Location
In your head
I agree, flipping Senate seats is no easy task. Here in Arizona Mark Kelly is deemed vulnerable, but I wouldn't bet much on him losing, he has a lot of Gabby Giffords sympathy supporters here.
Here in WA, long time incumbent democrat Sen. Patty Murray is up for reelection and the way they ran a smear campaign against novice opponent Tiffany Smiley in a field of 18 candidates is very telling that the democrats are worried about her seat. I hope they are right and Smiley runs away with the position in the general election.
 

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,468
Reaction score
1,505
Points
163
Only for people on the right, but never for any of the commies.
That’s idiotic. The FBI executes search warrants on anyone they need to. Left or right. Rich or poor.

You guys are appalled Trump is treated like an average citizen.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top