TheYellowKing
Diamond Member
Didn't read the rest of your nonsense since you agreed with meNegro in Spanish stands for Black, dark and dust - Spanish was we know derives to a larger extend from Latin - IMO it is a linguistic coincidence that the Tuareg word for the river Niger, egereou n-igereouen coincides with the Latin word niger (Black).
The Spanish and Portuguese used the term El Negrillo, for any African tribes people they discovered from then on.
It is a fact that in Portuguese and Spanish literature at the time, the English Moor (Arabs) was El Moro and that of negroid Arabs was El Mahomedano - no one used the term Negro or El Negrillo before the Niger river issue was recognized/discovered by the Spanish/Portuguese.
Negro/El Negrillo, therefore isn't a racist term, but an ethnological term. Black is racist - since it describes/denotes a people simply down to a skin color.
The same explanation applies to the Romans, who termed everyone living north of the Limes wall to be Germanic. So is Germanic a racist Roman term? or simply an ethnological term? applying to a vast group of people sharing the same socio-culture? I would say it was clearly an ethnological term and had absolutely nothing to do with racism.
The way people of different races and ethnicities are treating each other, e.g. subjecting another ethnicity simply due to it's skin color towards e.g. RACIAL SEGREGATION is termed RACISM.
Since there is no RACIAL SEGREGATION in the USA anymore since the 60'ies - Political or Racism by law doesn't exist in the USA.
However a Negro calling an European-American or e.g. an Irish-American simply a "White" - that is plain RACISM.
And a Negro calling an American, e.g. an Algerian-American a "Black" simply because he derives from the Continent Africa - that is plain RACISM and stupidity.
Negros calling themselves "Blacks" - is just plain stupid and shows their ignorance towards colonial history.