Advancing Into Feudalism

[PoliticalChic]

1. Language has, of course, been weaponized by the Democrats. They twist it in ways that Orwell spotlit in 1984.
" To meet the ideological requirements of English Socialism in Oceania, the ruling English Socialist Party (Ingsoc) created Newspeak,[1]:309 a controlled language of simplified grammar and restricted vocabulary designed to limit the individual's ability to think and articulate "subversive" concepts such as personal identity, self-expression and free will.[2] Such concepts are criminalized as thoughtcrime since they contradict the prevailing Ingsoc orthodoxy.[3][4]"

Newspeak - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Even more corrupt, it often means the opposite of what words mean.... as seen in Obama's 'Affordable Heathcare Act'....and 'the Equality Act.'



2. And, keeping feudalism in mind,...
Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
... the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.

None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).
The Democrats check every one of those boxes.

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.



3. Of course, under a monarch, disguised as overarching government, the god of the Left.....they own everything:

"House votes to set aside 3 million Western acres in 'massive land grab'
The House voted Friday to cordon off nearly three million acres of Western land in the name of environmental protection, overriding Republicans who called it a “massive land grab” that will kill jobs, increase wildfire danger and reduce access to public lands."

House votes to set aside 3 million Western acres in ‘massive land grab’

The House voted Friday to cordon off nearly three million acres of Western land in the name of environmental protection, overriding Republicans who called it a “massive land grab” that will kill jobs, increase wildfire danger and reduce access to public lands.

amp.washingtontimes.com

a. “…one out of every two acres in the West is federally owned. In Nevada, the figure is 81.1 percent; in Alaska, 61.8 percent; in Utah, 66.5 percent; in Oregon, 53 percent. In Connecticut and Iowa, the federal government owns 0.3 percent of the land.

“The federal estate is larger than France, Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom combined,” said Robert Gordon, a senior adviser for the Heritage Foundation. “It is too big and was never intended to be preserved as one big park, but the left is strangling use of it and with it, rural America.”
Hold your horses: Nevada standoff reveals bigger fight over federally owned land



b. This is but the tip of the iceberg, as feudal big government uses bogus regulations and statutes to essentially co-opt ownership of ‘private land.’

“…when land is public, or if it can be made quasi-public with so many regulations attached that most property rights are removed, people can’t afford to fight, having lost the better part of their wealth. So ideally for the movement, regulations should be almost infinite in reach and so imprecise as to be interpreted in a dozen ways. All that‘s needed to force these regulations is sufficient documentation of collapse, supported by books, movies, documentaries, museum exhibits, cartoons, newspapers and magazine stories, the devotion of fervid columnists, et cetera, ad infinitum, to convince the public that “something must be done.” This “feeling” is backed by a slightly more substantive hundred-page full-color glossy PDFs aimed at policy makers and politicians.”
Nickson, “Eco-Fascists,” p. 170.

 

[Moonglow]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

 

[rightwinger]

tl;dr

Can you ever get to the point?

 

[Seawytch]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

 

[Gdjjr]

Can somone point out, in the rules for the fed gov't employees, where the authority to land grab is granted?

 

[Rigby5]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

Public has nothing to do with it.
The problem is when the federal government claims land as theirs.
There should be no federal land.
The only reason there originally was any federal land is that new, poor states were at first unable to afford to administer all of their land themselves.
That should no longer be true, so all federal land should have been returned to the states by now.
There is a risk then that some local wealthy may have inordinate power in each state, but tough. That is the way it goes.

 

[Seawytch]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

Public has nothing to do with it.
The problem is when the federal government claims land as theirs.
There should be no federal land.
The only reason there originally was any federal land is that new, poor states were at first unable to afford to administer all of their land themselves.
That should no longer be true, so all federal land should have been returned to the states by now.
There is a risk then that some local wealthy may have inordinate power in each state, but tough. That is the way it goes.

Then you should start a thread about that. The fact is that these were already federal lands and the federal government is simply saying you can't rape it of its resources. They didn't "grab" anything.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

With thunderous applause.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Uncensored2008]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

If it's land I own, I need no one else's permission to go on that land or to use it.

But it isn't, it is the Kings land and we ALL know it.

 

[Moonglow]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

If it's land I own, I need no one else's permission to go on that land or to use it.

But it isn't, it is the Kings land and we ALL know it.

Such is life, just like the dept. of conservation is the guard .

 

[Uncensored2008]

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

It is the Crown's land. The peasants are forbidden by law from trespassing or using the Crown's land.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Such is life, just like the dept. of conservation is the guard .

Ultimately the goal of leftism is to undo the renascence. Marxism, Nazism, whatever we call it, is just a return to feudalism. All is owned by the crown and managed by barons and earls appointed by the crown.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

If it's land I own, I need no one else's permission to go on that land or to use it.

But it isn't, it is the Kings land and we ALL know it.

They lie about everything.

The make up fables designed to deprive owners of the use of their own land.

1. The Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis) is a species of true owl. It is a resident species of old-growth forests in western North America, where it nests in tree holes, old bird of prey nests, or rock crevices….The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red list status for the Spotted Owl is Near Threatened with a decreasing population trend….. In February 2008, a federal judge reinforced a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decision to designate 8,600,000 acres (35,000 km2) in Arizona, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico as critical habitat for the owl. Spotted owl - Wikipedia
   1. Ten years of research and more than 1,000 published studies detail the threats to its survival, but there's still no sure way to stop its decline. Saving the Spotted Owl
2. What is the cost of ‘saving’ the bird, and what’s the reason? Have organism’s become extinct? And the result? “From the environmentalists' perspective, the benefits of preserving the northern spotted owl and its habitat far outweigh any of the costs….society ought to preserve this species and the unique ecosystem it represents because of their aesthetic value. “ http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v4n1/
3. The Spotted Owl campaign, as is so very many other environmental campaigns, a deceit. It is a way of advancing the real agenda, confiscating property, making land off-limit, and eliminating any human presence. No matter the cost. No matter the result.
4. “Look, I don’t doubt that the regulatory process that we put in place to produce the environmental goods that we wan have taken a toll on the economy generally and the rural economy in particular. Telling the story that rural communities are being harmed may tug at the heartstrings of rural people, but no one else will care.
5. You see, what the sage grouse is about is, they want to stop drilling in beautiful Wyoming. That’s the hidden agenda….Take the spotted owl case….One of the people instrumental in shutting down th forests told me that ‘if the spotted owl hadn’t existed, we would have had to invent it.’ The goal was to stop logging….It is totally questionable whether owls were endangered by logging. Was it good for the overall health of the forest? Probably not. Was it good for the spotted owl? It probably didn’t make a difference. Did it hurt the overall economies of the West? Yes.” Nickson, “Eco-Fascists,” p.129.
6. Holly Fretwell is a Property and Environment Research Center (PERC): Senior Research Fellow, and an adjunct professor at Montana State University. She spent a year auditing the health Forest Service’s 446 million acres under it and the Bureau of Land Management’s command. The effect of fifteen years of sequestration of public lands has been a disaster. Thinning, salvage harvesting, cleaning deadfall are expressly forbidden by environmentalists, the areas are considered by the Forrest Service itself to be in immediate danger of exploding in a once-in-a-millennium fire that would burn so hot that not only would the seeds in the soil die, but also the dirt itself would be burned to dust. Fretwell, “Who is Minding the Federal Estate?” p. 54.
7. “The spotted owl was dying anyway. First of all, its prey was being eaten by the larger barred owl, which had been moving west for the last hundred years, but its supposed natural habitat was dying. In eastern Oregon and Washington’s Blue Mountain forests. 6 million acres are dead and dying. The Shasta-Trinity National Forest- formally designated spotted owl habitat- has so much root rot that it is called the Valley of Death. One breeding pair remains.” Nickson, Op. Cit., p.131.

Yet, somehow, this is a higher value than the people who live and work in these areas.

 

[Erinwltr]

For Sale

 

[Moonglow]

What she is really upset about is the group of folks that committed arson on federal land are being denied rights to the land after Trump gave them the rights back on 31 December of 2020..


The Biden administration’s Bureau of Land Management on Friday rescinded a grazing permit that was granted to Eastern Oregon ranchers who were previously convicted of arson on public lands.

It reverses the decision by former President Donald Trump’s Interior secretary, David Bernhardt. He had granted the permit to Dwight and Steven Hammond on Trump’s final day in office. The permit gave the Hammonds the right to graze livestock on public land for 10 years.

Friday’s decision comes one day after a coalition of environmental groups sued the government over Bernhardt’s decision. Their lawsuit alleged that Bernhardt cut short the required public and environmental review processes before issuing permits to the Hammonds.

Interior Department Rescinds Grazing Rights For Hammond Family, Reversing Trump Admin's Decision - Northwest Public Broadcasting

It reverses the decision by former President Donald Trump’s Interior secretary, David Bernhardt. He had granted the permit to Dwight and Steven Hammond on Trump’s final day in office. The permit gave the Hammonds the right to graze livestock on public land for 10 years. Continue Reading Interior...

www.nwpb.org

Ranchers whose case sparked standoff may get grazing rights

SALEM, Ore. (AP) — The federal government has proposed awarding grazing allotments to an Oregon ranching family whose members were convicted of arson in a court battle that triggered the takeover of a federal wildlife refuge by right-wing extremists.

apnews.com

 

[22lcidw]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

As we become more owing to other nations and elites, there are rumors we have to give up parts of our lands as payment to keep living at the standard of living we enjoy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

For Sale

"For Sale"


You forgot the rest......

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

Public has nothing to do with it.
The problem is when the federal government claims land as theirs.
There should be no federal land.
The only reason there originally was any federal land is that new, poor states were at first unable to afford to administer all of their land themselves.
That should no longer be true, so all federal land should have been returned to the states by now.
There is a risk then that some local wealthy may have inordinate power in each state, but tough. That is the way it goes.

Then you should start a thread about that. The fact is that these were already federal lands and the federal government is simply saying you can't rape it of its resources. They didn't "grab" anything.

If you ever get around to reading a book......



'

 

[Moonglow]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

Public has nothing to do with it.
The problem is when the federal government claims land as theirs.
There should be no federal land.
The only reason there originally was any federal land is that new, poor states were at first unable to afford to administer all of their land themselves.
That should no longer be true, so all federal land should have been returned to the states by now.
There is a risk then that some local wealthy may have inordinate power in each state, but tough. That is the way it goes.

Then you should start a thread about that. The fact is that these were already federal lands and the federal government is simply saying you can't rape it of its resources. They didn't "grab" anything.

If you ever get around to reading a book......



'View attachment 462297

natural heritage to rape the land and leave it barren and polluted...

 

[Rigby5]

In the broadest sense, they’re areas of land that are open to the public and managed by the government. You can think of it as land you own (and share with everyone else in the United States). There are three types of government that manage public lands: federal, state and local. Remember, public lands aren’t just national parks—your state and local city parks count, too. And there’s a difference among them. Federal public lands are held in trust for all Americans and the goal is to manage the land for the long-term health of both the land and citizens, according to The Conservation Alliance. Many federal agencies manage public lands for multiple uses, from recreation to timber, but in some form or another every American has a say in how these places get used. For states, it’s hard to generalize. For some lands, there’s no requirement to involve citizens in public land management decisions.

Your Guide to Understanding Public Lands - Uncommon Path – An REI Co-op Publication

In the last few years, the term “public lands” has been spoken about with increasing regularity. But what exactly are public lands?

www.rei.com

It was public land already...they just said nobody can rape it of it's resources.

Public has nothing to do with it.
The problem is when the federal government claims land as theirs.
There should be no federal land.
The only reason there originally was any federal land is that new, poor states were at first unable to afford to administer all of their land themselves.
That should no longer be true, so all federal land should have been returned to the states by now.
There is a risk then that some local wealthy may have inordinate power in each state, but tough. That is the way it goes.

Then you should start a thread about that. The fact is that these were already federal lands and the federal government is simply saying you can't rape it of its resources. They didn't "grab" anything.

Wrong. There were no federal lands are not supposed to be any.
It is just that when states first started out west, they could not afford to administer at first. The feds were only requested to administer temporarily, and they never were given or supposed to have ownership.
They were NOT already federal lands. In theory, there should be no such thing as any federal lands at all, anywhere, except DC. Even military bases are supposed to be state lands.
And the federal government is incapable of defending resources.
They are more distant and larger, so are MORE corrupt, not less.