The rights entire argument is based on stereotypes and exceptions.
The right heard that a bus driver made $200k once. End the UNIONS!
The right heard that a janitor took 400 days off in a year. End the UNIONS!
The right uses a problem that exists to make an argument to end everything they do not like. No company has no problems, but they never make an argument to end companies (except green ones). Funny how that works huh
Really?
I have never ONCE mentioned anything about a bus driver or a janitor...or the salary of any individual in a union.
My argument is actually based on the facts presented by the unions and their supporters (such as you).
The unions protect the employee. With VERY FEW EXCEPTIONS, a union protects the ones with controversial employment situations...such as attendance issues, work ethic issues, etc.
It admnittedly protects those with tenure...even when those with tenure have poor records. The ones with great records? Dont need the unions to protect them
Seems you prefer to deabte things that are not wiodespread issues so you can say "they are not widespread issues"...
But you dont want to address the real issues with unions.
But I bet if you were one of those WITHOUT tenure that was fired becuase someone with tenure got to keep their job even thoujgh their work ethic was well below yours...you would be on a soapbox claiming "foul".