Adam Schiff: "the destruction of these facilities is a positive in the sense that it will set back Iran‘s program."

[Seymour Flops]

Well, duh. That was the whole point, which Schiff agrees with.

As so often from Dems, he disagrees not with what Trump did, but the waaay he did it:

Schiff condemns Trump's Iran strikes, suggests only positive is setback of nuclear program

Sen. Adam Schiff criticized President Trump's decision to strike Iran on Sunday and argued the only positive was that it set back Iran's nuclear program.

www.foxnews.com

Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., criticized President Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear sites on Sunday, arguing that it shouldn't have happened without congressional approval, but said the only positive was that it set the regime's nuclear program back.

"In terms of is there anything positive to come out of it? Yes. I mean, the destruction of these facilities is a positive in the sense that it will set back Iran‘s program. And look, this is a nefarious regime that is the preeminent state sponsor of terror, should have never been pursuing a nuclear program.

So, Democrats and "not Democrats:" How do you see Trump getting that permission from Congress, exactly?

Is it possible for a hundred Senators and several hundred Representative, a significant percentage of whom are members of the party that is deranged in its hatred for Trump, to be told about this mission in advance without it being leaked to the media almost immediately, if not directly relayed to the Ayatollah?

Did Obama go to Congress every time he bombed a new country?

https://www.cnn.com/2014/09/23/politics/countries-obama-bombed

 

[shockedcanadian]

The fewer nukes in the world the better.

If the world voted with a guarantee that all nations would follow suit, you can bet that the world would vote for ZERO nukes for any country.

Now I live in the real world. As such, our next best outcome is the fewer number of nations with nukes, especially those who operate contrary to G-ds natural laws of freedom.

 

[Maxdeath]

You have to feel sorry for the mentally ill democrat cult. Obama threw bombs and drones around like confetti without congressional approval. To the tune of over 26,000. The democrats not only appeared but cheered. Trump drops a few and they go all mentally deranged. Obama handed them millions so they had more money to spend on their nuclear program.
We have been at war with them since about 1991 and seen Americans die and taken hostage. They have called for America to die over and over again. Now they are saying we will pay because of sleeper cells. Why would you have sleeper cells in a country if you were not planning on doing something harmful?

 

[luiza]

Today Tel Aviv .
Tomorrow the Gulf of Hormuz .

Freedom fighters could have US and Israel begging for mercy as ancient US Bombers look for non existent nuclear sites to bomb in Iran .
Clever the way the US goes about losing its conflicts -- never a dull moment and lots of laughs .

Meanwhile Russia continues to shred Ukraine .
Which falls first --- Kyiv or Tel Aviv ?
Great box office if they could finish off both together .

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

We have been at war with them since about 1991 and seen Americans die and taken hostage.

You talking about Iran or democrats?
Iran has been an enemy since 1979 and democrats have been co-opted by Marxists since 1972.

 

[Donald H]

The whole trouble is, the bombing of Iran's peaceful use of uranium has only upset their 'peaceful' use.

That then means that America must go to war against Iran to accomplish the agenda as was laid out in the PNAC.

Maybe one of the most important questions now is on whether or not America will attempt to assemble a coalition of the willing?

Maybe it's not a great time to attempt to drum up support for Netanyahu's country?

And what will Russia and China do now that Trump has granted them permission to directly strike the Zionists?

 

[Seymour Flops]

The whole trouble is, the bombing of Iran's peaceful use of uranium has only upset their 'peaceful' use.

That then means that America must go to war against Iran to accomplish the agenda as was laid out in the PNAC.

Maybe one of the most important questions now is on whether or not America will attempt to assemble a coalition of the willing?

Maybe it's not a great time to attempt to drum up support for Netanyahu's country?

And what will Russia and China do now that Trump has granted them permission to directly strike the Zionists?

Oh, LORD!

PNAC?

I haven't read that one on a while.

Please . . . for those members who haven't heard of the PNAC theory of world history, explain it.

 

[FDR_Reagan]

The reason most ignore Nazi-Luiza because she/he/it never believes her own Goebbels propaganda.

The poor Hitlerist Jihadi:

1. FIrst rooted in Oct/2023 for genocidal Hamas (who cause its Gaza population to die). Bounced between denying Oct/7 Islamist atrocities and celebrating it. (Just like Islamonazis do re WW2).
2.Then for Hezbollah in 2024, till the beeper-operation and Nasrallah elimination + Hezbollah/Iran losing Syria.
3. Then for Houthis, for a while. Hoping they inflict some large massacres. In between she posted stupid clips that no-one ever clicks on
4. Then for the Islamic Fascist Republic mullahcracy seking nukes for annihilation.
5. Now she/he/it is just very frustrated.

Posting fake-news-clips and whining.

LOSER!
LOL.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Schiff must be applying for US citizenship.

 

[Donald H]

Oh, LORD!

PNAC?

I haven't read that one on a while.

Please . . . for those members who haven't heard of the PNAC theory of world history, explain it.

The PNAC is already a hot topic on the board today.

War against Iran is coming soon. The reason will have to be based on Iran being able to save it's enriched uranium (WMD's) by moving it to a safe location.

Probably as soon as a week if the issue on the Zionist regime getting whacked too, can be solved?

‘If Iran falls, we’re next’: What Russian experts and politicians are saying about the US strikes

RT has gathered reactions in Moscow, ranging from geopolitical alarm to bitter irony, following the US attack on Iran’s nuclear sites

www.rt.com

That's the reason why I'm a bit worried about Russia and friends deciding the big question has to be decided in Iran and the Zionists' country!

 

[Donald H]

And now, US air bases in Qatar.

That'll do it!

The Ayatollah must have just put on his 'brave' hat!

 

[MarathonMike]

Well, duh. That was the whole point, which Schiff agrees with.

As so often from Dems, he disagrees not with what Trump did, but the waaay he did it:

Schiff condemns Trump's Iran strikes, suggests only positive is setback of nuclear program

Sen. Adam Schiff criticized President Trump's decision to strike Iran on Sunday and argued the only positive was that it set back Iran's nuclear program.

www.foxnews.com

Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., criticized President Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear sites on Sunday, arguing that it shouldn't have happened without congressional approval, but said the only positive was that it set the regime's nuclear program back.

"In terms of is there anything positive to come out of it? Yes. I mean, the destruction of these facilities is a positive in the sense that it will set back Iran‘s program. And look, this is a nefarious regime that is the preeminent state sponsor of terror, should have never been pursuing a nuclear program.

So, Democrats and "not Democrats:" How do you see Trump getting that permission from Congress, exactly?

Is it possible for a hundred Senators and several hundred Representative, a significant percentage of whom are members of the party that is deranged in its hatred for Trump, to be told about this mission in advance without it being leaked to the media almost immediately, if not directly relayed to the Ayatollah?

Did Obama go to Congress every time he bombed a new country?

https://www.cnn.com/2014/09/23/politics/countries-obama-bombed

Did Obama go to Congress to approve his gun running operation to the Mexican Drug Cartels?

 

[Seymour Flops]

And now, US air bases in Qatar.

That'll do it!

The Ayatollah must have just put on his 'brave' hat!

I'll give him props for fighting like a statesman in this case. But it has failed miserably, of course.

He will go to the suicide bombers targeting innocent Americans next, if history is any guide (and when is it no?).

Someone on Foxnews said that Iran announced it had fired the same number of missiles as the U.S. fired in targeting their nuclear weapons program. He speculated that this could be an indication that Iran is ready to negotiate, after having made its "proportional response."

Maybe . . .

 

[EMH]

Adam Schiff - left wing homosexual Zionist Fascist supporter of Big Government and W

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As so often from Dems, he disagrees not with what Trump did, but the waaay he did it:

Correct, because intelligent people with decent morals and ethics think on a higher, more nuanced level than people like you do.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

What Schifty really meant was he wanted Congress to have the opportunity to give Iran 30 days notice first, and promise them $100 Billion in an air drop late at night.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What Schifty really meant was he wanted Congress to have the opportunity to give Iran 30 days notice first, and promise them $100 Billion in an air drop late at night.

Strange, Iran will get much more cash from the fat orange rapist lifting oil sanctions than they ever got from Obama.

Did Newsmax not tell you this? Oops, looks like you are going to have to fake caring about something else, now.