Adam Schiff is Mentioned by Name three Times in the Durham Report. He Should be Kicked Out of Congress ASAP

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Nov 25, 2021
13,586
10,881
2,138
Texas
The first mention in the Durham Report is when Peter Fritsch of Fusion GPS, the private intelligence firm hired by the Clinton campaign to generate dirt on Trump, recommended a WSJ reporter call Schiff and Diane Fienstine to see if they are concerned about Carter Page spending time in Moscow.

1685756726470.png

He's is really being pushy on behalf of Clinton, chiding the reporter for the WSJ not showing more interest in the phony story he is generating, at Hillary Clinton's behest. Early on, we see Hillary's man naming Adam Schiff as a willing participant in pushing the story.

The second mention is in relation to the FBI spying on George Papadopoulos, Trump campaign official. "CHS" is Confidential human source, i.e. FBI plant, and GP is Papadopoulos.

1685757282779.png


So, having no idea he was talking to the FBI, Papadopoulos talked about how absurd any accusations of collusion would be, and by implication that Schiff's thinking that there was collution was (expletive) nuts. Schiff is not nuts, of course. Just dishonestly pursuing what the Clinton Campaign started.

In the third, a staffer for Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) uses Schiff's name as a veiled threat against a university researcher reluctant to get involved in the Russia investigation since he was a researcher at a tax-funded university and not a partisan think tank.

1685757949955.png


So Schiff participated in the scam from the beginning. Democrats naively believed that his "more than circumstantial evidence" of Russian collusion must have come from classified briefings that he was dutifully keeping classified. Now we know that such claims were merely a furthering of the elaborate hoax of which he was very much aware.
 
The first mention in the Durham Report is when Peter Fritsch of Fusion GPS, the private intelligence firm hired by the Clinton campaign to generate dirt on Trump, recommended a WSJ reporter call Schiff and Diane Fienstine to see if they are concerned about Carter Page spending time in Moscow.

View attachment 791189
He's is really being pushy on behalf of Clinton, chiding the reporter for the WSJ not showing more interest in the phony story he is generating, at Hillary Clinton's behest. Early on, we see Hillary's man naming Adam Schiff as a willing participant in pushing the story.

The second mention is in relation to the FBI spying on George Papadopoulos, Trump campaign official. "CHS" is Confidential human source, i.e. FBI plant, and GP is Papadopoulos.

View attachment 791190

So, having no idea he was talking to the FBI, Papadopoulos talked about how absurd any accusations of collusion would be, and by implication that Schiff's thinking that there was collution was (expletive) nuts. Schiff is not nuts, of course. Just dishonestly pursuing what the Clinton Campaign started.

In the third, a staffer for Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) uses Schiff's name as a veiled threat against a university researcher reluctant to get involved in the Russia investigation since he was a researcher at a tax-funded university and not a partisan think tank.

View attachment 791196

So Schiff participated in the scam from the beginning. Democrats naively believed that his "more than circumstantial evidence" of Russian collusion must have come from classified briefings that he was dutifully keeping classified. Now we know that such claims were merely a furthering of the elaborate hoax of which he was very much aware.
not enough evidence
 
not enough evidence
Just Schiff's constant repetition of the claim that he had seen "more than circumstantial evidence" of what we now know to be non-existent is enough for him to be run out of congress. I'm sure even you would say that that disqualifies him from ever again serving on the intelligence committee. But in my opinion, he should not even be on the House Administration Committee which is basically the janitors of congress.

His district will surely elect another Democrat, probably one much more woke, anyway.
 
He's a creepy little effer. That means Cali will cheerfully send him to the Senate.
 
Schiff's declaring that he possessed hard "evidence" of Trump's collusion with Russia, was simply a typical Democrat smear tactic. Politicians on both sides have been attempting to smear their political opponents, practically since this nation was founded. As for the Democrats and their obsession with Trump, even after his presidency, what bothers them the most is that when he originally ran for president, he used his own money and thus wasn't really beholding to either party and swore to "drain the swamp," which is filled with politicians on both sides of the aisle.
 
Government and politics have become so corrupt at this point nobody with any integrity wants to serve. You have to be a slimy lying douchebag.
 
Just Schiff's constant repetition of the claim that he had seen "more than circumstantial evidence" of what we now know to be non-existent is enough for him to be run out of congress. I'm sure even you would say that that disqualifies him from ever again serving on the intelligence committee. But in my opinion, he should not even be on the House Administration Committee which is basically the janitors of congress.

His district will surely elect another Democrat, probably one much more woke, anyway.

Schiff obstructed justice when he refused to turn over that "evidence" to the investigation committee.

Makes me wonder if he's actually working for Trump. :dance:
 

Forum List

Back
Top