Actor’s homophobia made her commercially toxic, tribunal told

[surada]

Actorâs homophobia made her commercially toxic, tribunal told

Seyi Omooba is suing Leicester theatre and talent agency after being sacked for Facebook post on homosexuality

www.theguardian.com

I really dont understand why she is suing the theatre. I do suspect that some fundie group is financing this.

Tommys view -- She should take her backward beliefs and fuck off back under a rock.

A sacked actor who would have refused to play the role in which she had been cast as a lesbian because it was against her Christian beliefs made herself “commercially toxic” and her continued employment would have forced the show’s cancellation, a tribunal has heard.

Seyi Omooba was due to play Celie in a production of The Color Purple at the Curve theatre, Leicester, but was removed from the show in March 2019 after the emergence of a Facebook post from 2014 in which she said homosexuality was not “right”.



Omooba, who is suing the Curve and her former agency Global Artists for breach of contract and religious discrimination, also said in the post that people could not be born gay.


The tribunal, which started last week, heard that Omooba had a “secret red line” about not being willing to play a gay character, which put her on a collision course with the theatre.

Omooba said she had not read the script in full before accepting the role, and had not asked the director or producers whether they intended Celie to be played as a lesbian in the production.

Tom Coghlin QC, representing Leicester Theatre Trust, described that as “unbelievably unprofessional” and suggested Omooba’s conduct would have left the theatre “high and dry” and without a key performer as opening night approached.

continued

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

 

[Correll]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

 

[surada]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Sacked actress 'kept no gay roles rule secret'

A tribunal is dealing with Seyi Omooba's dismissal from The Color Purple over a Facebook post.

www.bbc.co.uk

Nope, she had a red line around playing lesbian roles or doing sex scenes. She kept that secret from the producers and didnt read the script.

Maybe she has a case against the agent who sent her for the job but she really should have read the script before wasting peoples time.

On Tuesday, the Central London Employment Tribunal heard Ms Omooba had previously told her agents, Michael Garrett Associates Ltd (Global Artists), she would not play a gay role or do sexually explicit scenes.

 

[Meathead]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She said she didn't like faggotry. Is that undermining your company or boss?

Real snowflake stuff!

 

[surada]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She said she didn't like faggotry. Is that undermining your company or boss?

Real snowflake stuff!

She was hired to play the role of Celie. If you are hired to drive a bus, but can't, there's a problem.

 

[Meathead]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She said she didn't like faggotry. Is that undermining your company or boss?

Real snowflake stuff!

She was hired to play the role of Celie. If you are hired to drive a bus, but can't, there's a problem.

We get that, but should her career be ruined because she posted something several years ago that got your panties bunched up?

 

[Correll]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She did not "go" onto to facebook and undermine her boss.


Some little asshole dug up something from six years ago, to get her fired.


That bit where you felt the need to lie about what is going on, to defend your side's behavior?

That is your brain, realizing that you, plural, are the bad guys and that the only way to justify your actions is to lie.

 

[Correll]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Sacked actress 'kept no gay roles rule secret'

A tribunal is dealing with Seyi Omooba's dismissal from The Color Purple over a Facebook post.

www.bbc.co.uk

Nope, she had a red line around playing lesbian roles or doing sex scenes. She kept that secret from the producers and didnt read the script.

Maybe she has a case against the agent who sent her for the job but she really should have read the script before wasting peoples time.

On Tuesday, the Central London Employment Tribunal heard Ms Omooba had previously told her agents, Michael Garrett Associates Ltd (Global Artists), she would not play a gay role or do sexually explicit scenes.

I can certainly understand why she would keep that a secret from people like you.

Her agent did seem to drop the ball.


The human thing to do, would have been to ASK her once the issue became know, if she was willing to do her job, or if she should quit.


Or have you never known someone to say something adn then NOT stand by it, years later?

 

[surada]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She did not "go" onto to facebook and undermine her boss.


Some little asshole dug up something from six years ago, to get her fired.


That bit where you felt the need to lie about what is going on, to defend your side's behavior?

That is your brain, realizing that you, plural, are the bad guys and that the only way to justify your actions is to lie.

Perhaps her Christian feelings have changed.

 

[Correll]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She did not "go" onto to facebook and undermine her boss.


Some little asshole dug up something from six years ago, to get her fired.


That bit where you felt the need to lie about what is going on, to defend your side's behavior?

That is your brain, realizing that you, plural, are the bad guys and that the only way to justify your actions is to lie.

Perhaps her Christian feelings have changed.

Perhaps.


If you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who refused to play in hetro characters or do hetro sex scenes, would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why does anyone care about a theater actress in the UK?

 

[Correll]

Why does anyone care about a theater actress in the UK?

She did not conform to the liberal views on homosexuality, so she has to be attacked.

 

[surada]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She did not "go" onto to facebook and undermine her boss.


Some little asshole dug up something from six years ago, to get her fired.


That bit where you felt the need to lie about what is going on, to defend your side's behavior?

That is your brain, realizing that you, plural, are the bad guys and that the only way to justify your actions is to lie.

Perhaps her Christian feelings have changed.

Perhaps.


If you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who refused to play in hetro characters or do hetro sex scenes, would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?

Homosexuals play roles as heterosexuals quite frequently...always have. Look at Rock Hudson's romantic comedies for example..

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why does anyone care about a theater actress in the UK?

She did not conform to the liberal views on homosexuality, so she has to be attacked.

UK aka Little Mecca is of no concern to me. They allowed their country to before a caliphate so now they have to live with it.

 

[Correll]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She did not "go" onto to facebook and undermine her boss.


Some little asshole dug up something from six years ago, to get her fired.


That bit where you felt the need to lie about what is going on, to defend your side's behavior?

That is your brain, realizing that you, plural, are the bad guys and that the only way to justify your actions is to lie.

Perhaps her Christian feelings have changed.

Perhaps.


If you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who refused to play in hetro characters or do hetro sex scenes, would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?

Homosexuals play roles as heterosexuals quite frequently...always have. Look at Rock Hudson's romantic comedies for example..

Obviously.

My question was a hypothetical, IF you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who was not comfortable playing straight roles, or doing sex scenes with members of the opposite sex would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?



Because I think it would be completely understandable if some one was gay, that they might not be comfortable kissing someone of the opposite sex.


Are you going to answer me now, or do you want to talk some more about shit we both know about?

 

[Correll]

Why does anyone care about a theater actress in the UK?

She did not conform to the liberal views on homosexuality, so she has to be attacked.

UK aka Little Mecca is of no concern to me. They allowed their country to before a caliphate so now they have to live with it.

A position I respect.

On the other hand, the woman is a Christian and being discriminated against based on that.


Calling out the bigotry and hate and hypocrisy of the Left, is hard for me to NOT do.

 

[surada]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She did not "go" onto to facebook and undermine her boss.


Some little asshole dug up something from six years ago, to get her fired.


That bit where you felt the need to lie about what is going on, to defend your side's behavior?

That is your brain, realizing that you, plural, are the bad guys and that the only way to justify your actions is to lie.

Perhaps her Christian feelings have changed.

Perhaps.


If you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who refused to play in hetro characters or do hetro sex scenes, would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?

Homosexuals play roles as heterosexuals quite frequently...always have. Look at Rock Hudson's romantic comedies for example..

Obviously.

My question was a hypothetical, IF you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who was not comfortable playing straight roles, or doing sex scenes with members of the opposite sex would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?



Because I think it would be completely understandable if some one was gay, that they might not be comfortable kissing someone of the opposite sex.


Are you going to answer me now, or do you want to talk some more about shit we both know about?

She can put in her contract that she won't do love, scenes or nude scenes.

Celie is a great role.

 

[Correll]

Too bad Britain doesn't have Freedom of Speech.


Oh, wait,

that only works if you are a minority.

Ms Omooba may consider herself to be part of a minority but that is irrelevant in this instance.

She was hired to play a lesbian character and refused to do so. That leaves the theatre with a big problem.

They should sue her for wasting their time and money.

Your linked article said that she was fired for a facebook post from 2014, not for refusing to follow directions.


Either you are confused, or the article is very poorly written.


To be clear, if she accepted a role and then refused to play it, that would be on her. The question then becomes, why did she accept the role.


But, the facts as presented, it seems she was just sacked for having the wrong thoughts.

I agree the article is poorly written.But the key issue here is that she would not have done the job anyway. Aside from here repellant views that one thing left the producers with no option.

I just looked at the article again.

On second glance, it is clear that someone, the writer of the article or someone at the theater, just made up the bit about her not being willing to play the role.


She took teh role, and then some little fag lefty, went looking for shit and got her fired because of something she said on facebook, 6 years ago.


The claim that her presence on the set, would have been a problem for the show, is also made up bullshit.


btw, it is worth considering that this is how lefty fags come to dominate industries. They discriminate against people for not conforming.

Do you go on Facebook and undermine your company or your boss?

She did not "go" onto to facebook and undermine her boss.


Some little asshole dug up something from six years ago, to get her fired.


That bit where you felt the need to lie about what is going on, to defend your side's behavior?

That is your brain, realizing that you, plural, are the bad guys and that the only way to justify your actions is to lie.

Perhaps her Christian feelings have changed.

Perhaps.


If you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who refused to play in hetro characters or do hetro sex scenes, would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?

Homosexuals play roles as heterosexuals quite frequently...always have. Look at Rock Hudson's romantic comedies for example..

Obviously.

My question was a hypothetical, IF you heard of a homosexual actor or actress who was not comfortable playing straight roles, or doing sex scenes with members of the opposite sex would you find that offensive and worthy of condemnation and blackballing?



Because I think it would be completely understandable if some one was gay, that they might not be comfortable kissing someone of the opposite sex.


Are you going to answer me now, or do you want to talk some more about shit we both know about?

She can put in her contract that she won't do love, scenes or nude scenes.

Celie is a great role.

Why are you afraid to answer my question?