Activist Greta Thunberg will be forced to watch unedited footage of Oct 7 as a condition of her release/IDF

[rosends]

The Dead Sea Scrolls are in Greek and Aramaic, and Aramaic is an Arab language, just like Hebrew.
But there was no Hebrew script until around 100 BC.
The Dead Sea Scrolls are not in Hebrew.

so the fact that I can read this means I can read what language exactly?

 

[Rigby5]

the dead sea scrolls are largely in Hebrew---some aramaic which is a SEMITIC LANGUAGE--
not an "ARAB LANGUAGE" Ancient Sumerian is also not an "arab language"---
Arabic was influenced lots by AKKADIAN and that is about it-----and OF COURSE_--MUHUMMAD INVENTED SLICED BREAD and THE WHEEL

Semitic means Arab.

Arabic has nothing to do with it.
That is ONE Arab language, but not the oldest or first.

The Akkadians, Amorites, Chaldeans, Canaanites, Egyptians, etc. were all Arab.

Sumerian are sort of isolated, but likely were also Arab.

Arabs did NOT come from the Arabian Peninsula.
All humans came from Africa, and since they had to walk, they had to go through the Land of Canaan in order to even get to the Arabian Peninsula.

 

[irosie91]

so the fact that I can read this means I can read what language exactly?

View attachment 1122117

I have been in mosques----the answer to your question would be----YOU PRESENTED
A FRAUD

 

[rosends]

Semitic means Arab.

according to whom?

I looked online for a definition and saw

"

1. relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.
2. relating to the peoples who speak Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic."
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

[Rigby5]

If Jordan was given it, what about all the Palestinians who were already living there?

Black September and the PLO

The story of the September 1970 civil war between King Hussein's Jordanian military and Yasser Arafat's PLO, in what became known as Black September.

www.thoughtco.com

do you believe that Jordan should give back the areas of Jordan that were included in that map of "Palestine"?

Jordan ‘forcibly evicted’ Palestinians from informal refugee camp: HRW

Dozens of residents displaced from Amman’s al-Mahatta camp as authorities seek to widen roads, reduce congestion.

www.aljazeera.com

why do you decide that one name on the map is supposed to be convincing, but others don't count?

I'll let you keep believing this

Rare discovery at capital of the Kingdom of Israel

After nearly a century of archaeological silence, the ancient stones of Sebastia are speaking again as Israeli excavators uncover remarkable finds.

www.jns.org

The whole area of Jordan and Palestine was originally called TransJordan by the British.
The point of called the east Jordan and the west Palestine, was to limit the area of Palestine, where the Euro Jewish refugees would be accepted.
None of the natives in Jordan or Palestine cared what their nation was called.
There were already dozens of smaller historic cultures inside both.

The only problem was when the Zionist immigrants blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David hotel, and started wiping out native villages.
Otherwise the names and borders would not matter much.

 

[Zebra]

Activist Greta Thunberg and her merry band of fools will be forced by Israeli authorities to watch unedited footage of the Oct 7th massacre as a condition of their release from Israeli custody. This is what happens when you let a bunch of maleducated kids run freely about, convinced they know how to solve world conflicts.

Greta Thunberg and friends on intercepted ‘selfie yacht’ will be forced to watch ‘video of the horrors’ of Oct. 7, Israel says

“I instructed the IDF to show the flotilla passengers the video of the horrors of the October 7 massacre when they arrive at the port of Ashdod,” Israel’s defense minister, Israel…

nypost.com

has she seen it now?

and what did she say then?

 

[irosie91]

Semitic means Arab.

Arabic has nothing to do with it.
That is ONE Arab language, but not the oldest or first.

The Akkadians, Amorites, Chaldeans, Canaanites, Egyptians, etc. were all Arab.

Sumerian are sort of isolated, but likely were also Arab.

Arabs did NOT come from the Arabian Peninsula.
All humans came from Africa, and since they had to walk, they had to go through the Land of Canaan in order to even get to the Arabian Peninsula.

you can author the weekly KHUTBAH JUMAAT for all the mosques of the world or engage
in the very similar endeavor----STAND UP COMEDY

 

[Rigby5]

so the fact that I can read this means I can read what language exactly?

View attachment 1122117

The Romans created a Hebrew script around 100 BC.
But it was based on Aramaic.
Those claiming to read Hebrew are actually reading Aramaic that existed when the Hebrew were illiterate.
But being parchment, that likely is a fairly modern writing.
Likely 100 AD or newer.

 

[rosends]

The whole area of Jordan and Palestine was originally called TransJordan by the British.

No, you showed a map which called it Palestine well before there were any British people

The point of called the east Jordan and the west Palestine, was to limit the area of Palestine

already dispossessing the Arabs who lived in what would become Jordan

None of the natives in Jordan or Palestine cared what their nation was called.
There were already dozens of smaller historic cultures inside both.

In fact, they cared so little that they said things like "We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic, and geographical bonds" and “There is no such country as Palestine! ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria.” and “There is no such thing as ‘Palestine’ in history, absolutely not.”

I can give you citations for those quotes if you would like.

 

[rosends]

The Romans created a Hebrew script around 100 BC.
But it was based on Aramaic.
Those claiming to read Hebrew are actually reading Aramaic that existed when the Hebrew were illiterate.
But being parchment, that likely is a fairly modern writing.
Likely 100 AD or newer.

but that parchment is one of the DSS, so if you call that modern writing, and it matches modern Hebrew (and it does) then you just supported the claim that the DSS were in Hebrew.

 

[Rigby5]

according to whom?

I looked online for a definition and saw

"

1. relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.
2. relating to the peoples who speak Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic."
   

All those language groups, Hebrew, Aramaic, Akkadian, Phoenician, etc. are all Arab languages.
Obviously the Arab languages existed way before the Hebrew.
There is not a single trace of the Hebrew before they went to Egypt to escape a drought in the Sinai, around 1600 BC.
The Egyptians called them Arabs, and so did everyone else.
The Hebrew did not get called Jews until they invaded the Land of Canaan and picked up that name from the Canaanite Jerusalem. Notice how Canaanites like the 'J' names, like Jerusalem, Jericho, Jordan, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

No, you showed a map which called it Palestine well before there were any British people

The point is the map was ancient, about 100 BC, and had Palestine clearly as the title.

 

[Rigby5]

already dispossessing the Arabs who lived in what would become Jordan

Wrong.
Jordan is still populated by the same Arab natives today.
The fact it is ruled by the Arab Hashemites from further south, is not relevant, since they seem to be ruling fairly and are accepted.

 

[rosends]

All those language groups, Hebrew, Aramaic, Akkadian, Phoenician, etc. are all Arab languages.
Obviously the Arab languages existed way before the Hebrew.
There is not a single trace of the Hebrew before they went to Egypt to escape a drought in the Sinai, around 1600 BC.
The Egyptians called them Arabs, and so did everyone else.
The Hebrew did not get called Jews until they invaded the Land of Canaan and picked up that name from the Canaanite Jerusalem. Notice how Canaanites like the 'J' names, like Jerusalem, Jericho, Jordan, etc.

so none of this supports the claim that I challenged.

Also, "J names"? you're kidding, right?

 

[rosends]

The point is the map was ancient, about 100 BC, and had Palestine clearly as the title.

and Judea and Samaria

 

[rosends]

Wrong.
Jordan is still populated by the same Arab natives today.
The fact it is ruled by the Arab Hashemites from further south, is not relevant, since they seem to be ruling fairly and are accepted.

you mean except for the ones stuck in refugee camps or who were expelled.

 

[Rigby5]

In fact, they cared so little that they said things like "We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic, and geographical bonds" and “There is no such country as Palestine! ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria.” and “There is no such thing as ‘Palestine’ in history, absolutely not.”

I can give you citations for those quotes if you would like.

Wrong.
What the person is saying is that the name Palestine for the coastal region, does not reflect any particular leadership.
Clearly their intent is to describe Palestine as part of an even larger Arab history of Syria.

But clearly the term Palestine was not invented by Zionists.
Palestine likely was promoted by the Romans much earlier.

It is true you can zoom in or out on smaller subdivisions both historic and cultural or zoom out on larger empires both historic or and cultural.
But that does not matter.
What matters is there is no basic for taking land from the native owners and forcing it to be subjugated by any one religion.
Imposing religion is always wrong.
And stealing home without paying is always wrong.
So Israel is totally without merit, justification, or legality.

 

[Rigby5]

but that parchment is one of the DSS, so if you call that modern writing, and it matches modern Hebrew (and it does) then you just supported the claim that the DSS were in Hebrew.

Wrong.
The Dead Sea Scrolls are from the 2nd Temple period, which is Roman.
So then could be written in the new fake Hebrew script the Romans invented for them.

But the Dead Sea Scrolls were written much later than the events they depict, so are not actually of any historic value.
Its like reading ancient mythology.
Does not mean the Hebrew were Egyptian slaves, there was an Exodus, Moses parted the Red Sea, etc.
All that we now know to be false.

 

[Rigby5]

and Judea and Samaria

As small Roman city states.

 

[Rigby5]

you mean except for the ones stuck in refugee camps or who were expelled.

The refugee camps were for the Palestinians who escaped the massacres by Menachim Begin's terrorist gangs.
What is illegal is that they were never allowed the right of return to the homes and legal possessions.

About 62,000 Palestinian refugees forced to leave their homes in Palestine in 1946, still live in camps in Jordan.
It is only Arafat and the PLO who were expelled from Jordan.