Activist Greta Thunberg will be forced to watch unedited footage of Oct 7 as a condition of her release/IDF

The Nazis and Islam were allies

WRONG!
The Palestinians and all Mideast Arabs were on the side of the Allies in both WWI and WWII.

The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem went to visit Hitler in order to try some sort of alliance, but Hitler rejected it because he did not trust any Arabs, regardless whether they were Jewish or Moslem.
 
wrong again---the word PALESTINA was devised by the Greek Historian HERODOTUS--
approx. 500 BC and adopted as a name for the region by the Romans after TITUS---
destroyed Jerusalem----(first century AD) Try some reality. Until VERY RECENTLY---
"palestinian" meant a jew living in that area People called
"palestinian" on government papers before 1948 are, today--called ISRAELIS.
People called "arabs" or "syrians" or "armenians" are, today----muslims and
christians except for the people who have decided to call themselves "palestinians" (since
the 1960s) My dhimmi turned palestinian, turned israeli------is available to answer
questions

Wrong.
The fact the Greeks used the name Palestine first, proved the Romans did not invent it.
And Titus did not "destroy" Jerusalem, but just made the Jews leave after their second failed rebellion against the Romans.

The word "Palestinian" could never have meant "a Jew living in that area" since almost no Jews lived there since the Diaspora Decree of 160 AD, when the 12 tribes moved to Medina in Saudi Arabia. The 1922 census by the British showed only about 30k Jews in all of Palestine.

The word Israel is not ever applied to anything until after 1948 when the UN created Israel out of thin air.
 
the dead sea scrolls are largely in Hebrew---some aramaic which is a SEMITIC LANGUAGE--
not an "ARAB LANGUAGE" Ancient Sumerian is also not an "arab language"---
Arabic was influenced lots by AKKADIAN and that is about it-----and OF COURSE_--MUHUMMAD INVENTED SLICED BREAD and THE WHEEL

The Dead Sea Scrolls are largely in Aramaic and not Hebrew, but recently Zionists have been calling Aramaic "proto-Hebrew" in order to steal Aramaic from the Amorites.
 
The Dead Sea Scrolls are largely in Aramaic and not Hebrew, but recently Zionists have been calling Aramaic "proto-Hebrew" in order to steal Aramaic from the Amorites.
The Amorites are no longer extant nor is their language which was not
aramaic albeit a semitic language
 
If Jordan was given it, what about all the Palestinians who were already living there?
do you believe that Jordan should give back the areas of Jordan that were included in that map of "Palestine"?


why do you decide that one name on the map is supposed to be convincing, but others don't count?

I'll let you keep believing this

Wrong.
The article on the supposed capital of the kingdom of Israel said:
{...
Decorated columns that flanked this ancient thoroughfare now lie beside the pathway, a testament to the architectural sophistication of the Herodian period (roughly 37 BCE to 73 CE).
...}

And since King Herod was a Roman who only claimed to convert to Judaism, that architecture they are digging up is all Roman.

There is no Jewish architecture anywhere.
That is because the Hebrew were sheep herders and not builders.
 
true---but rigs serves a function----he cites the bull shit ' education ' that galvanizes terrorism thruout the world

Wrong.
The "terrorists" are the Israelis who started the violence by blowing up the British peace keepers in the King David Hotel.
 
The Amorites are no longer extant nor is their language which was not
aramaic albeit a semitic language

Doesn't matter is Amorites still exist or not.
The language of Aramaic is not by the Hebrew, who were known to be illiterate.
 
Wrong.
The article on the supposed capital of the kingdom of Israel said:
{...
Decorated columns that flanked this ancient thoroughfare now lie beside the pathway, a testament to the architectural sophistication of the Herodian period (roughly 37 BCE to 73 CE).
...}

And since King Herod was a Roman who only claimed to convert to Judaism, that architecture they are digging up is all Roman.

There is no Jewish architecture anywhere.
That is because the Hebrew were sheep herders and not builders.
more madrassah ^^^^ in REALITY the columns are Roman emulations of Greek
stuff whish is actually emulation of Egyptian stuff-----and PITA precedes muhummad
and arabic
 
more madrassah ^^^^ in REALITY the columns are Roman emulations of Greek
stuff whish is actually emulation of Egyptian stuff-----and PITA precedes muhummad
and arabic

Wrong.
The "Herodian period" is Roman.
King Herod was not really Jewish, but a Roman who claimed to convert to Judaism.
It was just the Roman way of creating a puppet government.

Mohammed and Arabic having nothing to do with it.
The Arabs were the natives of the Levant, and still are.
The Hebrew clearly were just a small Arab splinter group that got isolated in the Sinai.

Uncovering Roman construction is useful, but says nothing about Judaism.
 
known by whom----other than your Imam?

Here is the first hit.
{...
The Hebrew alphabet is a script that was derived from the Aramaic alphabet during the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman periods (c. 500 BCE – 50 CE). It replaced the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet which was used in the earliest epigraphic records of the Hebrew language.
...}

So what that is saying is that the Hebrew took the Aramaic alphabet from 500 BC to 50 AD.
That means during the period of King David, from 1000 BC to 800 BC, there was no Hebrew script.
 
Wrong.
The "Herodian period" is Roman.
King Herod was not really Jewish, but a Roman who claimed to convert to Judaism.
It was just the Roman way of creating a puppet government.

Mohammed and Arabic having nothing to do with it.
The Arabs were the natives of the Levant, and still are.
The Hebrew clearly were just a small Arab splinter group that got isolated in the Sinai.

Uncovering Roman construction is useful, but says nothing about Judaism.
you are exhibiting "loosening of associations" ----a neurological phenomenon most notable
in Schizophrenia (linguistically and genetically----arabic)
 
Here is the first hit.
{...
The Hebrew alphabet is a script that was derived from the Aramaic alphabet during the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman periods (c. 500 BCE – 50 CE). It replaced the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet which was used in the earliest epigraphic records of the Hebrew language.
...}

So what that is saying is that the Hebrew took the Aramaic alphabet from 500 BC to 50 AD.
That means during the period of King David, from 1000 BC to 800 BC, there was no Hebrew script.
Is you Imam literate in any language at all? ie, is he the EXCEPTION to the rule?
 
The only "historical precedent" that Isael represents is the barbaric genocide of the native Canaanites by the invading Hebrew tribes from Egypt, around 1000 BC to 800 BC.
let's pretend that was true. It would still place Israel in the region well before anything called "Palestinians."
There is no excuse for a religion to be imposed over a region.
so you are against establishing a caliphate or applying Muslim religious law anywhere in the world?

No one else has ever even considered doing that.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition
No culturally Moslem nation has ever imposed a religion on anyone.
"culturally Moslem"? What does that mean?

For example, I have seen video of a Jewish hospital in Israel that rejected an Arab injured child, and forced them to go to an Arab hospital.
That is not only evil, but inherently illegal.
I haven't seen that video. I have seen MANY, though, that show Arabs coming into Israeli hospitals. People you might have heard of, like Ismail Haniyeh .
 
Wrong.
The article on the supposed capital of the kingdom of Israel said:
{...
Decorated columns that flanked this ancient thoroughfare now lie beside the pathway, a testament to the architectural sophistication of the Herodian period (roughly 37 BCE to 73 CE).
...}

And since King Herod was a Roman who only claimed to convert to Judaism, that architecture they are digging up is all Roman.

There is no Jewish architecture anywhere.
That is because the Hebrew were sheep herders and not builders.
you do realize that what that quote says is unrelated to the claim you then "disprove", right?
 
She is no expert, but she happens to be right.
And you are half right
Global warming is from fossil fuels,
yeah, well I remember when it was also the cause of the next ice age.
and the starvation blockade of Palestine is illegal and evil.
And rife with opportunists who have completely dismissed october 7th as the reason for all this and instead use it as an excuse that has necessitated the jump from the sinking "climate change" movement to the next celebrity photo OP in Gaza knowing that the socially educated won't recognize it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom