According To Witnesses The Michael Brown Killer Cop Acted Like A Vigilante

Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

It certainly doesn't take long for lefties to turn a story like this into a race baiting issue, and to fuel the fire of hatred and anger into all those looters/rioters.

There's a political agenda to be attained here, and it's important for the lefties to get there instead of waiting for the facts to come out.
 
Its people like you all who has a hand in these riots... just like you made the Trayvon Martin some hero and scalped Zimmerman over it..Unless you live there , there's nothing you can do about it but stir up more shit

But you didn't have a problem when they sent 200 armed agents out to a whites mans ranch and home to seize his land
 
Is the killed child playing Rock breaks Scissors, or is that some sort of gang sign?

140810-michael-brown-jsw-140810_74d147f2b4d188b0cef8dfeabdfecc7a.jpg
You know, you really should try harder if you're going to be making BOGUS claims.

Why gang sign is it if it's a gang sign [MENTION=47870]Vigilante[/MENTION]?

It's clearly a peace sign.



It could very easily be the sign, or a variation of the sign, for a gang known as "The Vice Lords." The two fingers representing the "V" and the extended thumb representing the "L."

Now, I have no way of knowing whether or not this particular gang has a presence in the St. Louis area, but I do know the sign and I know they are in the Chicago area...

100_0598-242x171.jpg



Now I do believe we need to wait for the investigations, especially the FBI and Justice Department investigations, to be completed before we start convicted people on either side. With the possible exception of the looters and thieves folks are quaintly referring to as "protesters."

According to the family, this young man had graduated high school of some sort and was about to begin training at a technical school. That strikes me as someone working to start his life, if true. I would, however, be interested in knowing whether or not Mr. Brown had any prior contact with law enforcement and in what capacity. I am also interested in knowing what kind of record the officer has.

Of course prior run-ins with the police should in no way be considered justification for what happened, but until all is known about all parties, no one will be satisfied.
 
Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

Eyewitness testimony is among the least reliable in point of fact. Ask 10 different people from different vantage points to describe a single event and you often get 10 different accounts. Before believing an eyewitness, consider that the media's already tried and convicted the officer involved, and what they "remember" is going to be tainted already by such reporting.

If the slain suspect was such a "good boy" why'd the officer react to him with lethal force? You don't react that way to a 'Girl Scout.' Nor to someone who's calm and answering your questions respectfully recognizing your authority. On the other hand, if you're being disrespectful, claiming all the rights you think you have (but probably don't,) acting aggressive and agitated then resist a lawful arrest and go for the officer's weapon, yes, I dare say you're going to get shot.
 
It's a peace sign.

I've done the sideways peace sign in my youth as well.

Black folks have a thing called flavor.

We do things differently sometimes just because, especially in our youth.

Gang signs are more complicated than that.

If it's a gang sign, then you have to identify it.

Until then, it's a peace sign, as I've identified it.


[MENTION=20450]MarcATL[/MENTION]

No its not. I guess this is 'then'

Quit covering for your 'people'. Your part of the problem and offer nothing to a solution

-Geaux


This gangsta is showing off the backwards peace sign before capping his prey in the ass, yo.

Backwards_Peace.jpg


The Backwards Peace Sign is an archaic gang symbol used by Japanese kids, Gangstas, and White People that will never be Gangstas. The symbol itself is a reference to the values of the average gangster, turn your back against peace and cap the mo' fo's ass. Gangstas often give this symbol to their prey before viciously killing them with a fast metallic object, in the ass. However it has been developed to be used in other situations such as taking dorky pictures and imitating a confused hippie. The Chinese consider it to be the retarded brother of the normal Peace Sign and have adapted it to mean **** you.

Backwards Peace Sign - Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
The simian who got shot shoved the cop backwards into the car. Then the simian tried to 'jump' the cop and grab the cop's gun. A single shot was fired INSIDE THE CAR! (Can you all say: "Forensic testing of the car's interior PROVING THIS FACT!?)
The witnesses are once again going to prove how ******* dumb they are by attempting to make up BS 'accounts' of what happened and in so doing will negate all the eye witness reports.
I LOVE the fact that good old ambulance chaser 'Benny' is the family lawyer. WOW! That ought to be good for a few laughs.The simian got his law degree out of a Cracker Jack box. AKA he was 'streamed' through law school. 'Affirmative action' by friends.
"Look everyone. We know these law students would never have got anywhere near a law school without affirmative action. But so what? All they will ever do is work for Blacks who just want to scam insurance companies for a few bucks and the insurance companies just cut a cheque to the lawyer to make the problem go away and the lawyer then waddles off to their Black clients and gives them half the money and they keep the rest. 'Win win'.
 
It's not always about ethnicity just because different ethnicities are involved in officer-suspect altercations or shootings. But the media always attempt to portray it that way because it's more entertaining. Community reps and activists do too because it lines their coffers. Lawyers swoop in and offer representation to increase their own reputations. It's a big whore-off. Meanwhile, some rookie officer avoids pulling over a clearly impaired driver of a different ethnicity for fear of being accused of racist motives and the driver continues on and kills somebody.

This isn't a hypothetical. Way people feed off these things has real-world effects.
 
Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

Those witnesses are biased and should not be believed. Hook them up to a lie detector and watch them squirm.
 
Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

Eyewitness testimony is among the least reliable in point of fact. Ask 10 different people from different vantage points to describe a single event and you often get 10 different accounts. Before believing an eyewitness, consider that the media's already tried and convicted the officer involved, and what they "remember" is going to be tainted already by such reporting.

If the slain suspect was such a "good boy" why'd the officer react to him with lethal force? You don't react that way to a 'Girl Scout.' Nor to someone who's calm and answering your questions respectfully recognizing your authority. On the other hand, if you're being disrespectful, claiming all the rights you think you have (but probably don't,) acting aggressive and agitated then resist a lawful arrest and go for the officer's weapon, yes, I dare say you're going to get shot.

There was an incident several years ago in NW Ark. A cop shot and killed a mentally challenged young man on the side of the highway..He was unarmed and was down on the ground, yet one cop that was told not to get out at the scene, exited his vehicle, jumped out of his squad car and shot the kid while he was on the ground, all he got was a misdemeanor...Cops kill, why, probably a power trip. But cops do kill for no real reason..
 
Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

Those witnesses are biased and should not be believed. Hook them up to a lie detector and watch them squirm.

Lie detector results are not admissible as evidence in a trial...
 
My understanding is the kid tried to grab the cop's gun and got shot for it. If that's true it was a justified shooting. It all depends on the particular facts of what happened.
What is clear is that rioting and burning down your neighborhood is an act of stupidity.
 
Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

Eyewitness testimony is among the least reliable in point of fact. Ask 10 different people from different vantage points to describe a single event and you often get 10 different accounts. Before believing an eyewitness, consider that the media's already tried and convicted the officer involved, and what they "remember" is going to be tainted already by such reporting.

If the slain suspect was such a "good boy" why'd the officer react to him with lethal force? You don't react that way to a 'Girl Scout.' Nor to someone who's calm and answering your questions respectfully recognizing your authority. On the other hand, if you're being disrespectful, claiming all the rights you think you have (but probably don't,) acting aggressive and agitated then resist a lawful arrest and go for the officer's weapon, yes, I dare say you're going to get shot.

There was an incident several years ago in NW Ark. A cop shot and killed a mentally challenged young man on the side of the highway..He was unarmed and was down on the ground, yet one cop that was told not to get out at the scene, exited his vehicle, jumped out of his squad car and shot the kid while he was on the ground, all he got was a misdemeanor...Cops kill, why, probably a power trip. But cops do kill for no real reason..

No ones does anything for no reason. If they do they're by definition clinically insane and not a cop. Making generalized statements like this with no follow-up or neutral presentation of the facts is unfair to the millions of police around the world by misrepresenting one incident as though that justifies the statement 'cops kill for no reason.' While not a professional debater, I believe that's called a strawman arguement.
 
Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

Yes, we will get to the bottom eventually, so in the mean time make sure you spread whatever romor you can to make the fire burn hotter.

So what we are to believe is this, so far. There was a minor robbery. For that robbery the police acted stupidly and murdered a young man in plain sight of more then one witness. Even though that seems very unlikely it could be true. So that then raises the question of what is the connection between that event and the riot and stealing of other people's stuff? Just because the police might have acted stupidly does that automatically give license to steal?
 
[MENTION=13580]CaféAuLait[/MENTION]

You don't believe the multiple witnesses' testimonies, but you believe the nancy story the cop gave about a gun shot first going off in the car, yet end up with him gunning down the boy 35 feet AWAY from the car??!

It's Trayvon Martin again w/you people just believing what you want to believe.

If the boy did steal something as some reports have stated, then I can see why the cop would approach the boys like that.

That's the ONLY reason to even have him approach them like that.

For the cop's sake, I hope there was a theft.

Because if there wasn't...that's his A$$!

It's the cop's ass anyways.

In that neighborhood a white cop's life is not worth a plugged nickel. No lies by "witnesses" and no prejudice by jurors is too outrageous as long as it helps to convict a cop for doing his job.

If it ever comes to trial, the jury will inevitably be predominantly having the same skin color as the "victim".

Such a jury would never, under any circumstances acquit a cop, especially a WHITE cop, any more than a similar sort of jury would never, under any circumstances convict a killer like O.J. Simpson.

Welcome and wake up to the world of politically correct jurisprudence.
 
15th post
Dorin Johnson, the young man that claims to be with Michael Brown during the incident has given multiple interviews stating that the cop reached his arm out the car while driving and accosted the victim Michael Brown, then came out and shot him.

Another witness, Piaget (I forget her last name) also witnessed it from the balcony of her apartment corroborates that .

There's been reports that the victim stole something from QuickTrip, well, if there's no 911 call from the QT...that cop is toast.

As it stands right now, it's not looking too good for that cop.

Everything the police has said to this point is in complete contradiction to what all the witnesses are saying.

In a neighborhood full of people, there are more than the two above mentioned witnesses as well, most who have remained anonymous.

The FBI is already involved in the investigation and sooner or later, we'll get to the bottom of this mess.

Those witnesses are biased and should not be believed. Hook them up to a lie detector and watch them squirm.

Lie detector results are not admissible as evidence in a trial...

No one said it was.

I'm willing to bet none of them thugs would submit to one.
 
It's a peace sign.

I've done the sideways peace sign in my youth as well.

Black folks have a thing called flavor.

We do things differently sometimes just because, especially in our youth.

Gang signs are more complicated than that.

If it's a gang sign, then you have to identify it.

Until then, it's a peace sign, as I've identified it.


[MENTION=20450]MarcATL[/MENTION]

No its not. I guess this is 'then'

Quit covering for your 'people'. Your part of the problem and offer nothing to a solution

-Geaux


This gangsta is showing off the backwards peace sign before capping his prey in the ass, yo.

Backwards_Peace.jpg


The Backwards Peace Sign is an archaic gang symbol used by Japanese kids, Gangstas, and White People that will never be Gangstas. The symbol itself is a reference to the values of the average gangster, turn your back against peace and cap the mo' fo's ass. Gangstas often give this symbol to their prey before viciously killing them with a fast metallic object, in the ass. However it has been developed to be used in other situations such as taking dorky pictures and imitating a confused hippie. The Chinese consider it to be the retarded brother of the normal Peace Sign and have adapted it to mean **** you.

Backwards Peace Sign - Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Thats Metta World Peace formerly known as Ron Artest. Hes not a gangsta. He plays basketball.
 
It's a peace sign.

I've done the sideways peace sign in my youth as well.

Black folks have a thing called flavor.

We do things differently sometimes just because, especially in our youth.

Gang signs are more complicated than that.

If it's a gang sign, then you have to identify it.

Until then, it's a peace sign, as I've identified it.


[MENTION=20450]MarcATL[/MENTION]

No its not. I guess this is 'then'

Quit covering for your 'people'. Your part of the problem and offer nothing to a solution

-Geaux


This gangsta is showing off the backwards peace sign before capping his prey in the ass, yo.

Backwards_Peace.jpg


The Backwards Peace Sign is an archaic gang symbol used by Japanese kids, Gangstas, and White People that will never be Gangstas. The symbol itself is a reference to the values of the average gangster, turn your back against peace and cap the mo' fo's ass. Gangstas often give this symbol to their prey before viciously killing them with a fast metallic object, in the ass. However it has been developed to be used in other situations such as taking dorky pictures and imitating a confused hippie. The Chinese consider it to be the retarded brother of the normal Peace Sign and have adapted it to mean **** you.

Backwards Peace Sign - Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Thats Metta World Peace formerly known as Ron Artest. Hes not a gangsta. He plays basketball.

I'm sure no pro athlete has ever been in a gang. :cuckoo:

The relationship between basketball and gangs is no secret. Traditionally the best basketball players often came out of the most impoverished areas, in which they had very little options other than balling or joining a set.

Gangsterish Athletes and Their Entourages
 
Back
Top Bottom