About Those J6 “People”

[beagle9]

I don't believe Dell is intentionally lying. I do believe he is simply a very ignorant person.

Did the judge in the E. Jean Carrol suit equate the finding of liability for sexual battery to rape?

Yes. In the E. Jean Carroll civil case, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan explicitly stated that the jury’s finding of liability for sexual abuse (civil battery) was, in ordinary language, equivalent to rape.

Here’s the distinction he made:

• The jury did not find Trump liable for “rape” under New York’s narrow statutory definition, which required forcible penile penetration.
• However, Judge Kaplan later clarified in a written opinion that the jury’s finding “clearly establishes that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll as that term is commonly understood.”

So, while the legal label was “sexual abuse” (a form of civil battery), the judge equated it to rape in the everyday sense — emphasizing that the verdict proved a violent sexual act even if it didn’t meet the statute’s technical wording.

That line appears in E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 22‑cv‑10016 (LAK) — specifically in the Memorandum and Order dated February 9, 2024.

You can verify it directly in the court’s docket or in coverage by The New York Times and Reuters, both of which quoted Kaplan’s statement verbatim.

All a farce.... Have to understand lawfare in order to understand what's been happening to Trump.

 

[Delldude]

I don't believe Dell is intentionally lying. I do believe he is simply a very ignorant person.

Did the judge in the E. Jean Carrol suit equate the finding of liability for sexual battery to rape?

Yes. In the E. Jean Carroll civil case, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan explicitly stated that the jury’s finding of liability for sexual abuse (civil battery) was, in ordinary language, equivalent to rape.

Here’s the distinction he made:

• The jury did not find Trump liable for “rape” under New York’s narrow statutory definition, which required forcible penile penetration.
• However, Judge Kaplan later clarified in a written opinion that the jury’s finding “clearly establishes that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll as that term is commonly understood.”

So, while the legal label was “sexual abuse” (a form of civil battery), the judge equated it to rape in the everyday sense — emphasizing that the verdict proved a violent sexual act even if it didn’t meet the statute’s technical wording.

That line appears in E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 22‑cv‑10016 (LAK) — specifically in the Memorandum and Order dated February 9, 2024.

You can verify it directly in the court’s docket or in coverage by The New York Times and Reuters, both of which quoted Kaplan’s statement verbatim.

I don't believe Dell or alwaysrite are intentionally lying. I do believe they are catergorized simply as very ignorant persons.

Did the judge in the E. Jean Carrol suit equate the finding of liability for sexual battery to rape?

Yes. In the E. Jean Carroll civil case, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan explicitly stated that the jury’s finding of liability for sexual abuse (civil battery) was, in ordinary language, equivalent to rape.

Here’s the distinction he made:

• The jury did not find Trump liable for “rape” under New York’s narrow statutory definition, which required forcible penile penetration.
• However, Judge Kaplan later clarified in a written opinion that the jury’s finding “clearly establishes that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll as that term is commonly understood.”

So, while the legal label was “sexual abuse” (a form of civil battery), the judge equated it to rape in the everyday sense — emphasizing that the verdict proved a violent sexual act even if it didn’t meet the statute’s technical wording.

In Judge Lewis A. Kaplan’s February 2024 opinion denying Donald Trump’s post‑trial motions, he wrote that the jury’s verdict “clearly establishes that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll as that term is commonly understood.”

That line appears in E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 22‑cv‑10016 (LAK) — specifically in the Memorandum and Order dated February 9, 2024.

You can verify it directly in the court’s docket or in coverage by The New York Times and Reuters, both of which quoted Kaplan’s statement verbatim.

Like I said, she's being investigated for committing perjury and you lied about it.

 

[Lesh]

He incited and encouraged people to attack. He must have been paid to be there and do that. Then he received no consequences for what he did, it was all a setup obviously for dumb shits like you.

Nonsense. Endlessly repeating your bullshit is stupid.

He was a nobody

 

[Lesh]

Sexual assault was the liability.....not equated rape, liar.

That’s your defense? Sexual assault isn’t as bad as rape?

 

[Lesh]

Sexual assault was the liability.....not equated rape, liar.

Yeah

Huge difference right?

 

[Delldude]

That’s your defense? Sexual assault isn’t as bad as rape?

Yeah

Huge difference right?

Lesh needs to understand the difference between civil liability and criminal law.

 

[Lesh]

Lesh needs to understand the difference between civil liability and criminal law.

You need to stop excusing sexual assault

 

[Delldude]

You need to stop excusing sexual assault

Funny how she's being investigated for perjury in the noncriminal lawsuit........

Sexual assault based on lies?

 

[Clipper]

Not a good idea to call someone a rapist who hasnt been convicted of rape. It means you're a liar and a slanderer
Are you still trying to wash that Joe Biden shit off your face? You might as well not, cuz it's not coming off. You stink of it

Post where I called him a rapist, assbreath.

I know your desperate & all having your ass handed back to you with actual facts. Cry harder, your tears are comedy gold.

 

[Clipper]

Funny how she's being investigated for perjury in the noncriminal lawsuit........

Sexual assault based on lies?

Pure outright harrassment by Trump & his bottlicker's at DOJ, who are his own personal law firm funded by taxpayer's.

 

[Nostra]

Post where I called him a rapist, assbreath.

I know your desperate & all having your ass handed back to you with actual facts. Cry harder, your tears are comedy gold.

That was easy…..

You support a pedophile & a rapist. Speakes volumes about your morality, or lack of it. You're scum.

Did the education you receive teach you to support child rapists? Must be.

 

[Nostra]

Post where I called him a rapist, assbreath.

I know your desperate & all having your ass handed back to you with actual facts. Cry harder, your tears are comedy gold.

This was easy too, liar……

Oh look, there's a rapist & a former stripper on the W.H. lawn! And don't forget his multi millionaire asseaters like Dainty Lindsey backslapping each other for ******* over the poor & middle class!

Where oh where is a multi million volt lightening bolt when we need one?

 

[Nostra]

Post where I called him a rapist, assbreath.

I know your desperate & all having your ass handed back to you with actual facts. Cry harder, your tears are comedy gold.

Oh look is…..another accusation he is a rapist from the lying sack of vermin shit….

Who's surprised that a convicted felon, rapist & coup plotter is ignoring court orders? No one with a brain, that's who.

 

[Nostra]

Post where I called him a rapist, assbreath.

I know your desperate & all having your ass handed back to you with actual facts. Cry harder, your tears are comedy gold.

Seems to be a pattern with you, liar.

And now a weak, worthless corrupt felon rapist Trump, is going to sell out Ukraine & our NATO allies to his murderous war criminal buddy, Putin.

As you MAGA shit for brains idiots applaud your cult leader.

 

[jacksonlamb]

All a farce.... Have to understand lawfare in order to understand what's been happening to Trump.

Sure, Trump is liable to civil and criminal law, beagle.

He is a lifetime crook.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Above we see MAGA lying and lying, the classic marks of narcissism and gaslighting.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Like I said, she's being investigated for committing perjury and you lied about it.

Narcissistic lying and gaslighting by Dell.

Short answer: No — E. Jean Carroll is not being formally investigated for perjury.

Here’s what the latest verified reporting shows:

The U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Andrew Boutros, issued an official statement saying his office:

“has not opened — and has never opened — a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll. Any claim to the contrary is categorically false.”

This directly refutes media rumors that she was under federal investigation.

 

[jacksonlamb]

They let Epps slide because he was working for them.
The cops let a bunch of people in and then prosecuted them. Surreal
The whole thing smells bad to anyone with intelligence who looks into it. I guess it just boils down to what you want to believe and whose side you're on.

Your opinion is stupid. You have no evidence, nothing to corroborate your allegations. You are yelling into the wind.

 

[Delldude]

Pure outright harrassment by Trump & his bottlicker's at DOJ, who are his own personal law firm funded by taxpayer's.

Bottlickers?

But it's cool for Reid Hoffman to do the same thing for the DNC ?

 

[jacksonlamb]

Like I said, she's being investigated for committing perjury and you lied about it.

You were refuted with the facts. There is no official investigation of such. Stop it, Dell, You are wrong.