About Those J6 “People”

OR, the tough talk is from fbi "assets" who are there for the purpose of making the political enemies of the deep state, look bad.





OR, the feds decided to agitate adn incite a riot, for political purposes.



But that makes no sense. The plan was not done. THe mob reacted to being attacked by the capitol police adn then swarmed forward.

The violence was clearly chaotic and unplanned.

"DIRECTION OF LEADERS"?



HOw is that relevant to anything? The offer was made with the intent of making sure there was no violence. YOu are playing retard to stonewall now.





You admitted that normally republicans did not riot.

The beginning of the riot was when the capitol police opened fire with non-lethal weapons on the peaceful crowd.

AFTER the crowd was incited by Epps and who knows who else.
Who did Trump make the 10k offer to?
 
But their job does not include abusing their authority, harming people, depriving us of rights.
Of course not. We probably had one of the best police forces in the world in 2020 until you guys effed it up. Now we're still trying to play catch up. You have made us much less safe. Thank God we elected Trump things are getting back to normal.
Yes, they should be scrutinized. If we don’t, then we don’t live in a country of laws.
They are
Funny how you didn’t want to be tough dealing with the lawless rioters on Jan 6th. You said that the police injured by your MAGA compatriots were “whiners”.
Actually those are Democrat cops and they have done a lot of whining. I never heard any Portland cops whine like that after they were brutalized by antifa in the summer of 2020. Did you see that cop at the Jan six hearings crying? What a crock. Cops don't whine like that.
You’re just another authoritarian asshole who doesn’t think the law applies to your political tribe.
You're just another limpwristed leftist who probably lives behind a gated community thinking that crime is somebody else's problem. I wish you guys would stop effing with the police. You don't know what you're doing. Be a man
 
You’re delusional.
Answer a question for me. you don't admit being a Democrat because you are ashamed of what you've done? Or are you just embarrassed? Everything about you on here reeks of a Democrat.
 
Last edited:
So you were lying when you claimed you already told me.

Yeah go look ya old coot
I told you I saw it in a presentation. I told you that and you asked again.
I located a 2nd official report you can digest.

Why the January 6th Mob Wasn’t Stopped in Time

Another for Lesh the inferior


ABCNews_Social_CapitolRiotTimeline_v04_ks_1702929097170_hpEmbed_4x5.jpg

The U.S. Capitol Riot Timeline
 
The SCOTUS did not vindicate them. As you showed the SCOTUS said one of the charges against them doesn't apply to them.
"doesn't apply"

Uh huh. It just so happens to have been accidentally "applied" to hundreds of political defendants and was considered amongst the most serious of charges. Biden's DOJ magically got it wrong hundreds of times on charges that could put people behind bars for decades. You damn moron. LOL

No, it was straight up politically motivated and was conjured out of nowhere because they wanted to lock these people up......guilty or not. You know it and I know it. And guess what happened? They are ALL free now because of you fools. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Yeah, you said you can't show where it's from because you didn't save the link. It's too bad there aren't search engines or AI to help find stuff on the internet.
Everybody gets tired late at night. When I first read it, it was around 3 am. I decided I needed sleep over you posters.
 
Yeah, you said you can't show where it's from because you didn't save the link. It's too bad there aren't search engines or AI to help find stuff on the internet.
Here is a far better thing for you to inquire about.

What went wrong with the capitol police. Why did they not control them in the hour the visitors merely stood outside the barriers. When the Park police were told, why did they sluff off the notices.
 
Trump pardoning his criminal minions is just reprehensible Trump shit
My original opinion was that those who committed acts of violence that day (a very small percentage of protesters there) shouldn't be pardoned. After Biden's DOJ got caught red-handed, though, trying to make a political example of innocent people and trying to lock them up for decades for crimes they did not commit I changed my mind and completely understood President Trump's mindset. You f*ckers made it a political hit job against hundreds of defendants and that shows the whole thing was a political clown show and a fraud. Let them all go. The whole process was tainted.
 
Last edited:
And justice prevailed on that, isn't that right?
Not if Biden's DOJ had gotten their way. Are you saying it's okay to give crooked cops a pass so long as those they were framing for crimes were eventually freed? Yeah, that's not how we do things in this country.

You're an idiot.
 
The photo does show him on the side of her car, does it not?
After he had been struck by the vehicle and shot her through the windshield in self-defense for it? Sure does!

Fortunately for us, the good guy lived and the bad guy got killed!
 
Last edited:
Are you comparing the use of rubber bullets to real bullets?

You’re not very smart.

So it was a rubber bullet that went through Ashli Babbitt's forehead? That's the most lethal rubber ever seen! What the hell?

Someone here is indeed not very smart! And we know who it is, dummy!

:auiqs.jpg:
 
SCOTUS chose to narrow the scope of the law from the plain text meaning to something much more limited based on their assumed context.

SCOTUS doesn't just "choose" you dummy. This isn't a multiple guess quiz based on "assumptions" or feelings. Our SCOTUS interprets the law for us. What you really meant to say is that they applied the law exactly as it was written and exactly as was intended by Congress when it was written, I believe? Stupid SCOTUS, right? Always tossing you kooks to the curb based on the law and Constitutition! lol

Less Than 20% of people were charged with this and almost all of them had been convicted of other crimes in addition to this charge.

20% means it applied to hundreds of defendants!! This was also the most serious charge on virtually every case in which it was applied. Defendants were facing the possibility of decades behind bars if found guilty under this statute. Lots had already been convicted/plead guilty under this politically motivated hatchet job. Many, in fact, were sitting in jail with this as their ONLY charge before it was vacated by the Supremes.

Don't try to feed anyone your left-wing bullshit about this being inconsequential or an "oops" by Biden's DOJ. It was a straight-up political hitjob. We all know what it was. When politics are the motive behind such a mass scale attempt to use the legal system to go after innocent people they it's lost legitimacy across the board. Now they are all free because of you kooks' and your nonsense....regardless of what they did or didn't do. Justice served I say.
 
Last edited:
"doesn't apply"

Uh huh. It just so happens to have been accidentally "applied" to hundreds of political defendants and was considered amongst the most serious of charges. Biden's DOJ magically got it wrong hundreds of times on charges that could put people behind bars for decades. You damn moron. LOL

No, it was straight up politically motivated and was conjured out of nowhere because they wanted to lock these people up......guilty or not. You know it and I know it. And guess what happened? They are ALL free now because of you fools. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
One of the first people charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 1512 was Guy Reffitt, who was charged on January 19, 2021 by Trump's DOJ. So Trump's DOJ was in on the politically motivated charge as well? Looks like it was Trump's DOJ who got the ball rolling on that charge.
 
15th post
One of the first people charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 1512 was Guy Reffitt, who was charged on January 19, 2021 by Trump's DOJ. e.
Where does it say that Reffitt was charged with obstruction of justice under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prior to Biden being inaugurated?

Your article simply states he was "charged with unlawful entry for being at the U.S. Capitol and obstruction of justice for threatening his family to prevent them from talking."

That's not the same legal statute. Got anything, dimwit?
 
Last edited:
True. Not visitors. Just people trying to move in univinted...PERMANENTLY and illegally....right?
"Permanently?" Some yes, some no. Either way, they're not visitors. Just like those who broke the law on 1/6, being on Capitol grounds or in the Capitol illegally.
 
Not if Biden's DOJ had gotten their way. Are you saying it's okay to give crooked cops a pass so long as those they were framing for crimes were eventually freed? Yeah, that's not how we do things in this country.

You're an idiot.
Sounds to me like you're not familiar with our justice system. People get overcharged all the time. Often they can't afford a decent attorney to fight it. Other times the over charges are used as leverage to plead down to lesser charges. And it's not political. It's how prosecutors work in this country at the state and federal level. If you don't know this you should. And to be clear, I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is and how it's been for longer than I can remember.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom