About Those J6 “People”

Prosecutors presented evidence that Rhodes, with others, conspired to oppose by force the lawful transfer of presidential power. Show where they failed to prove their case.
They were partisan and biased in a failed Washington DC Democrat judicial system. It's called two-tiered Justice.
 
It seems like you are trying to minimize the corruption showed by democrats on jan 6 for partisan reasons. You are minimizing what happened with BLM and antifa (which is your side) for over a year summer 2020. A little honesty on your part would go a long way here. There is a reason you guys didn't want to release those j6 videos for a long long time until you are forced to
Quote me minimizing the BLM riots.
 
Perhaps you do not know or recall when Clinton was president, cheated on his wife. Raped several women and Democrats rushed to defend him like was their dear leader.
I didn't. He was an embarrassment to the nation. But you're doing now what those Democrats did then.
 
The whole thing was contrived and incited to cover for your corrupt leaders. I am so happy that the people saw through it all and elected Trump in 24. We are working hard to make it right.
I saw the riots happening live. You can't convince me that riot or the resulting charges were contrived.
 
Are you denying he said Carroll wasn't his type? Or are you denying he pointed to his ex-wife as the person he said wasn't his type?
Are you denying you fabricated what Trump said?

LOL....The Junkie needs a fix...... :auiqs.jpg:

QPmeD7.gif
 
Pretty sure I'm not the one who's confused.

Here's Trump saying Carroll wasn't his type.



And here's Trump pointing to a woman he was once married to, thinking it was Carroll, who he said was not his type.


You are confused, Wrong conversation dude
Screenshot_20260614_151135_DuckDuckGo.webp
 
Epps conspired to lead people into the building. Same thing. In fact he was down on the ground doing it. Rhoads was not
Not the same. Rhodes conspired not only to go inside the building, but to use force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. You have nothing to show of Epps calling for using force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.
 
I didn't. He was an embarrassment to the nation. But you're doing now what those Democrats did then.
Who wanted Epps prosecuted. Not Democrats. Who still defends Epps, not Republicans. Democrats defend Ray Epps.

As I accurately reported when it was Clinton the vast majority of democrats defended him and many still defend him by changing the subject of him being guilty of cheating on his wife and raping women.

I am not defending Epps or Rhodes. I simply do not believe they got equal justice.
 
Not the same. Rhodes conspired not only to go inside the building, but to use force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. You have nothing to show of Epps calling for using force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.
Conspiring to lead a contingent Force into the building and just getting a slap on the wrist for it is all the proof I need.
 
Not the same. Rhodes conspired not only to go inside the building, but to use force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. You have nothing to show of Epps calling for using force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.
What did Rhodes do to stop the peaceful transfer of power, which was not being transferred until later in January?
 
Not the same. Rhodes conspired not only to go inside the building, but to use force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. You have nothing to show of Epps calling for using force to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.
The same. Why are you all sticking up so hard for Epps anyway. Why did Democrats not want to even prosecute him in the first place? Is it because he helped you in your quest for persecuting MAGA?
 
15th post
Convicting someone of a crime they commit is a cornerstone of this country. It's not obvious corruption just because you disagree with it.
Why are you such an ardent supporter of Ray Epps? We called for his conviction. Democrats resisted it then and today.
 
Back
Top Bottom