Couchpotato
Platinum Member
- Mar 2, 2021
- 15,087
- 7,326
- 938
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet. Which is my point. When a baby is viable outside the womb is a moving timeline toward conception.
You’re changing the requirements now. It was viable outside the womb. Now it’s viable outside the womb and not on any life support?unless you want it tied to machines, not to mention, unless technology advances so much that organs are grown in labs to accommodate natural ones that aren't at all functioning .... & then there's brain activity..... you will be waiting for a very long time.
You’re changing the requirements now.
It was viable outside the womb.
Now it’s viable outside the womb and not on any life support?
Let me ask you. If you’re in a car accident tmw and are in the hospital on life support can I come stab you with impunity?
Indeed. Thanks for the false equivalency,Agreed. Same for slavery, right?
playtime
Do you think that’s not true? How many weeks premature was a baby viable in 1950? 1960? 70, 80 today? Is that number getting bigger smaller or staying the same?
I wasn't going there. I was pointing out that SCOTUS got slavery wrong. But now that you mention it, treating human life as property to be disposed of at the will of its owner isn't a false equivalency. It's spot on.Indeed. Thanks for the false equivalency,
I wasn't going there. I was pointing out that SCOTUS got slavery wrong. But now that you mention it, treating human life as property to be disposed of at the will of its owner isn't a false equivalency. It's spot on.
If I saw them that way would I be any better than them?For left wing sociopaths mass murder is always their solution to social and economic problems. They don't like being inconvenienced for more than a couple of seconds.
If I saw them that way would I be any better than them?
Couldn't careless what you believe. Never understood why people are bothered by other people's religious beliefs.Yes you would. You're just mad because I don't buy the idiot claim that Peter founded the Catholic Church. lol you will stay butt hurt, obviously.
I don't see it that way.Yes you would.
Couldn't careless what you believe. Never understood why people are bothered by other people's religious beliefs.
I'm not. I couldn't care less what others believe. It doesn't affect me in the least. Why would you care what others believed?Now you're lying. You care very much when your own sect's propaganda gets questioned.
They are human lives.
Iceland is heading toward eugenics. Not a great idea.
I wasn't going there. I was pointing out that SCOTUS got slavery wrong. But now that you mention it, treating human life as property to be disposed of at the will of its owner isn't a false equivalency. It's spot on.
At conception a new human being has come into existence.Slavery involves the rights of only one person. Abortion, the competing rights of two. What is similar is that they both involve a fundamental right to body autonomy.
If you say so, that is a matter of individual belief.At conception a new human being has come into existence.