NotYourBody
Gold Member
- May 25, 2019
- 2,237
- 492
- 140
Yes absolutely. A woman controls her own body and what happens inside of it. Nobody else gets control of her reproductive system. Period.Punished? If that's the way you want to look at it then sure.So you feel all men should be punished because there are some men that do not care of their responsibilities?The laws that allows abortion is sexist. The preborn baby is as much a part of the man as it is the woman. The woman is no more than a carrier of the preborn baby that the present law allows her to kill regardless of the man's wishes. If you place a fertilized egg in a woman and she carries it to full term and allows the baby to continue to live it will have no genetic comparison to the carrier therefore she is just a carrier.
an estimate of about 21 million children are born out of wedlock in the world
The latest US number
12.1% are informal child support agreements established between the two parents
- There are currently 13.6 million custodial single parents living in the U.S.
- About half of them (50.2%) have some type of legal or informal child support agreement in place
- 87.9% of those child support agreements are formal agreements, established in court or through a Title IV-D agency
Only 12 percent of men are stepping up to the plate without being forced too
$33.7 billion dollars in child support was owed during the year 2015
Granted some men step up to the plate but a lot of then don't
Realistically, normal women will never let men assume control over our bodies. Never.
If you don't want to be responsible for an abortion, keep control of your sperm. It's that simple.
So, you are saying that women should not have to face ANY responsibility for getting pregnant, but hold ALL discretion in terms of the life or death of the new life inside them. That is a very condescendingly misandrist position to take.Here's an idea. If a man doesn't want his offspring aborted, he shouldn't place his sperm in the body of a woman who doesn't want a child. Condoms are cheap.What danger this is not 1920? The man can not carry a baby only pay for it if the woman chooses to allow the baby to live. The woman can not get pregnant without the sperm of a man which is something missed by many when they took biology in school.The laws that allows abortion is sexist. The preborn baby is as much a part of the man as it is the woman. The woman is no more than a carrier of the preborn baby that the present law allows her to kill regardless of the man's wishes. If you place a fertilized egg in a woman and she carries it to full term and allows the baby to continue to live it will have no genetic comparison to the carrier therefore she is just a carrier.
The man takes none of the risks of pregnancy. His life is never in danger.
But I have an idea. If it is as much a part of the man as the woman, let him take on the pregnancy and allow him to have it implanted. It might be uncomfortable and a bit risky, but what pregnancy isn't?
Men need to control their sperm if they are concerned about abortion. Once they've placed it inside the woman's body, they no longer have control of the situation.
If a man doesn't like abortion, he has to control his sperm. Because his control ends with his own reproductive system. It's as simple as that.