WHERE_R_MY_KEYS SAID:
“You're literally claiming that Killing the ABSOLUTELY MOST INNOCENT OF HUMAN LIFE is "LEGAL", therefore it is 'right'[.]”
Incorrect.
No one is making any such claim, and it's this sort of demagoguery and contempt for the Constitution and its case law that is typical among most opposed to the right to privacy, and those who seek to expand the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.
The right that the Constitution protects is the right to be free from unwarranted interference by the state concerning personal, private matters, and the right to make decisions in accordance with one's good conscience.
As a fact of law abortion is not 'murder,' as murder concerns criminal law, not civil, where the right to privacy occupies the realm of civil law, affording the citizen substantive due process prohibiting the state from violating the protected liberty immune from the capricious whims of simple majorities motivated by subjective beliefs and desires. If one indeed believes abortion is 'wrong' then that person is at liberty to not have an abortion, and is at liberty to speak out against the practice – but he is not at liberty to seek to codify that opposition, in violation of each citizens' right to privacy.