JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #221
being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
I oppose Trump, voted for McMullin not Johnson, and make fun of you. Yes, I am more conservative than you on this, unless you believe only the life of the mother or not at all.being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
Really Jake? Yet you support Hillary who embraces late term abortion right up to when the child is in the birth canal. No, I don't believe you.
I oppose Trump, voted for McMullin not Johnson, and make fun of you. Yes, I am more conservative than you on this, unless you believe only the life of the mother or not at all.being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
Really Jake? Yet you support Hillary who embraces late term abortion right up to when the child is in the birth canal. No, I don't believe you.
Do you believe it is wrong to abort a human life?being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
Since the law is clear that abortion is not illegal, and the word, "murder" is the illegal taking of life, then we know that abortion isn't murder and is not illegal.
As to someone's moral objections to abortion, I simply couldn't care less. I can point to things that go on every day that I do not consider moral, including a lot of religious practices and beliefs, such as the Catholic ban on birth control in overpopulated, impoverished countries. But, that means nothing to anyone but myself.
It depends on which law you embrace. Twelve states say the unborn child is a person. The federal government is the authority who has stupidly said it is not. Even common everyday sense says it is a person. It's certainly not a refrigerator.
That you have always had trouble comprehending is nothing new to the Board, and now that you sink into very old age and increasing dementia, I am not too concerned about your failures.I oppose Trump, voted for McMullin not Johnson, and make fun of you. Yes, I am more conservative than you on this, unless you believe only the life of the mother or not at all.being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
Really Jake? Yet you support Hillary who embraces late term abortion right up to when the child is in the birth canal. No, I don't believe you.
Your response made no sense at all. Did you read what you posted?
being can't comprehend simple facts any more.Since the law is clear that abortion is not illegal, and the word, "murder" is the illegal taking of life, then we know that abortion isn't murder and is not illegal.
As to someone's moral objections to abortion, I simply couldn't care less. I can point to things that go on every day that I do not consider moral, including a lot of religious practices and beliefs, such as the Catholic ban on birth control in overpopulated, impoverished countries. But, that means nothing to anyone but myself.
It depends on which law you embrace. Twelve states say the unborn child is a person. The federal government is the authority who has stupidly said it is not. Even common everyday sense says it is a person. It's certainly not a refrigerator.
...even though the United States Supreme Court has held throughout the 50 states that abortion has been legal s legal since 1973.........{sigh}
Since the law is clear that abortion is not illegal, and the word, "murder" is the illegal taking of life, then we know that abortion isn't murder and is not illegal.
As to someone's moral objections to abortion, I simply couldn't care less. I can point to things that go on every day that I do not consider moral, including a lot of religious practices and beliefs, such as the Catholic ban on birth control in overpopulated, impoverished countries. But, that means nothing to anyone but myself.
It depends on which law you embrace. Twelve states say the unborn child is a person. The federal government is the authority who has stupidly said it is not. Even common everyday sense says it is a person. It's certainly not a refrigerator.
...even though the United States Supreme Court has held throughout the 50 states that abortion has been legal s legal since 1973.........{sigh}
That you have always had trouble comprehending is nothing new to the Board, and now that you sink into very old age and increasing dementia, I am not too concerned about your failures.I oppose Trump, voted for McMullin not Johnson, and make fun of you. Yes, I am more conservative than you on this, unless you believe only the life of the mother or not at all.being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
Really Jake? Yet you support Hillary who embraces late term abortion right up to when the child is in the birth canal. No, I don't believe you.
Your response made no sense at all. Did you read what you posted?
That you can't comprehend a sensible sentence is your problem, old son. You are showing your advancing dementia.Tell me what is your stance on abortion, if you believe that it ever should occur.That you have always had trouble comprehending is nothing new to the Board, and now that you sink into very old age and increasing dementia, I am not too concerned about your failures.I oppose Trump, voted for McMullin not Johnson, and make fun of you. Yes, I am more conservative than you on this, unless you believe only the life of the mother or not at all.being is failing to tell the reader that I am more conservative on regulated abortion than he.
Really Jake? Yet you support Hillary who embraces late term abortion right up to when the child is in the birth canal. No, I don't believe you.
Your response made no sense at all. Did you read what you posted?
The least you could do is to format a sensible sentence. What the hell does> "unless you believe the life of the mother" supposed to mean? The life of the mother what?
Since the law is clear that abortion is not illegal, and the word, "murder" is the illegal taking of life, then we know that abortion isn't murder and is not illegal.
As to someone's moral objections to abortion, I simply couldn't care less. I can point to things that go on every day that I do not consider moral, including a lot of religious practices and beliefs, such as the Catholic ban on birth control in overpopulated, impoverished countries. But, that means nothing to anyone but myself.
It depends on which law you embrace. Twelve states say the unborn child is a person. The federal government is the authority who has stupidly said it is not. Even common everyday sense says it is a person. It's certainly not a refrigerator.
...even though the United States Supreme Court has held throughout the 50 states that abortion has been legal s legal since 1973.........{sigh}
The Supreme Court has been on the wrong side before. Those politically partsian are not God as they will on day realize.
being is like reagan, saying, "I don't understand this," when shortly he will understand none of it. Stop whining, and tell me what you believe should be the limits of abortion.
being is like reagan, saying, "I don't understand this," when shortly he will understand none of it. Stop whining, and tell me what you believe should be the limits of abortion.
Since I believe abortion to be the premediated murder for hire of a defenseless human being, I see no instance where it should be permitted.
Thank you. Then, yes, your understanding is far narrower than mine, and I was wrong mine was narrower. I believe in cases of genetic malformations that will lead to quick death after birth, rape, family incest, and the life of the mother as reasons acceptable for abortion.being is like reagan, saying, "I don't understand this," when shortly he will understand none of it. Stop whining, and tell me what you believe should be the limits of abortion.
Since I believe abortion to be the premediated murder for hire of a defenseless human being, I see no instance where it should be permitted.
If the Jewish Holocaust were still going on today, would you be telling people to get over it because it was the law of the land?The Supreme Court my sometimes be right, and sometimes be wrong, but it will always be the Supreme Court. Issue closed until/unless overturned. It has been 43 years. Get over it.
If the Jewish Holocaust were still going on today, would you be telling people to get over it because it was the law of the land?The Supreme Court my sometimes be right, and sometimes be wrong, but it will always be the Supreme Court. Issue closed until/unless overturned. It has been 43 years. Get over it.
Another massive fallacy of false equivalency. Length of the holocaust has nothing to do with the fact if SCOTUS says so, it is says so until SCOTUS says no, then it is says no.If the Jewish Holocaust were still going on today, would you be telling people to get over it because it was the law of the land?The Supreme Court my sometimes be right, and sometimes be wrong, but it will always be the Supreme Court. Issue closed until/unless overturned. It has been 43 years. Get over it.
Correct.Since the law is clear that abortion is not illegal, and the word, "murder" is the illegal taking of life, then we know that abortion isn't murder and is not illegal.
As to someone's moral objections to abortion, I simply couldn't care less. I can point to things that go on every day that I do not consider moral, including a lot of religious practices and beliefs, such as the Catholic ban on birth control in overpopulated, impoverished countries. But, that means nothing to anyone but myself.