frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 50,349
- 12,236
- 2,180
This is why it should be resolved by facts and logic, not by "feelings".
There are no "facts and logic".
It all depends on what you think is most important.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is why it should be resolved by facts and logic, not by "feelings".
Do you support the California law that allows abortions during birth?I'm a right-leaner and I support the utility of abortion.![]()
No. But the preborn often do.In every state it comes to a citizen vote, Republicans lose.
Like slavery being ruled by popularity?In every state it comes to a citizen vote, Republicans lose.
It would have lost on a national vote.Like slavery being ruled by popularity?
No, it would not have. Thats why abolition was never passed by Congress.It would have lost on a national vote.
Yes it would. Only the South had slavery. The population of the South was substantially less than the reset of the US. Further, the US population was growing massively by that time, and it wasn't growing in the South.No, it would not have. Thats why abolition was never passed by Congress.
What do you think the major economic foundation was for the North?Yes it would. Only the South had slavery. The population of the South was substantially less than the reset of the US. Further, the US population was growing massively by that time, and it wasn't growing in the South.
The North was in the throes of the Industrial Revolution.What do you think the major economic foundation was for the North?
Cotton and textile industries.
Thanks to cotton, Dufus.The North was in the throes of the Industrial Revolution.
No. Thanks to steel and coal. They didn't need slaves. They had immigrants.Thanks to cotton, Dufus.
You really are an ignoramus. Cotton drove the Industrial Revolution.No. Thanks to steel and coal. They didn't need slaves. They had immigrants.
The South thought that. The British showed them.You really are an ignoramus. Cotton drove the Industrial Revolution.
![]()
Did Cotton Drive the Industrial Revolution, or Is It More Complicated?
Was cotton the main driving force of the Industrial Revolution, or were other rapidly growing industries just as important?www.thoughtco.com
The Cotton Industry and the Industrial Revolution - History Learning Site
The United Kingdom experienced a huge growth in the cotton industry during the Industrial Revolution. The factories that were required to produce cotton became a legacy of the time – Sir Richard Arkwright at Cromford built the world’s first true factory to produce cotton. With an ever increasing...www.historylearningsite.co.uk
77% of British cotton was supplied by the US, Dufus.The South thought that. The British showed them.
Until it wasn't in 1861.77% of British cotton was supplied by the US, Dufus.
Thanks for acknowledgment that the North had a vested interest in slavery.Until it wasn't in 1861.
I didn't.Thanks for acknowledgment that the North had a vested interest in slavery.
You’re at a crossroads. You can either acknowledge historical facts or show everyone how ignorant you are about slavery and why Congress made no attempts to end it.I didn't.
And if you can't "get" why individual bodily sovereignty is more important than the intrusive desires of busybodies to right all wrongs with government, well - I actually can explain it to you. But I doubt you'd listen. You'd rather jerk it to a self-righteous orgasm.Abortion is a bellwether issue. If you don't "get" why abortion is wrong, I can't explain it to you. If you understand it's wrong, none of the standard "pro-choice" arguments will persuade you.
~~~~~~Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, mercy killing, and abortion all have in common that they are practices that seem utilitarian, but endanger all of us by eroding respect for the sanctity of human life.