Zone1 Abortion and Transgender is Demonic

[Trickster]

Dehumanizing life is an emotional argument.

You are dehumanizing the only actual human being abortion concerns -- the woman. You are attributing humanity to protoplasm. It is anti-human, anti-life and misogyny.

You simply cannot handle this topic because you are not in reality.

 

[Trickster]

The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology fifth edition, Moore and Persaud, 1993, Saunders Company, page 1

Citations are not arguments, ChatGPT.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

i

Yes. She doesn't understand the science.

I see clearly that she understands science, plus the distinction that DNA has nothing to do with sanctity of life.

Humans bodies are part of the animal kingdom, and in particular quite similar to mammals.

There is distinction between “life” in all mammals and the “sanctity of life” that is uniquely associated only with humans within most of civilized society.

Jews have contributed greatly to the civilization of a mankind and for probably 1400 years from the birth of Christ Christians were never of the opinion that the sanctity of life begins at conception

St. Thomas Aquinas did not believe that.

He believe life started much more closely to the law that was in shrine for 50 years under Roe versus Wade.

Most protestants supported Roe Wade in 1973


you claimed that America was founded as a Christian nation, which has to mean that Jewish belief that comes from a God who accepts human beings who believed for 6000 years that life begins at live birth.

So what science tells you that the sanctity of life begins at conception?

 

[Donald H]

Militant atheists don't know how to read the bible. They only know how to read Marx.

I, as an atheist, can only speak for myself. I don't read it or even have time to waste on reading it.

I take my information from you and others like you who have thrown out the creation, etc. nonsense. We should get together to work on Meriweather. She's intelligent enough for us to be confident that she can be moved!

Let's not waste anymore time on the 'airhead' literal believers who know that the Ark is still up on Mt. Ararat!

 

[ding]

You are dehumanizing the only actual human being abortion concerns -- the woman. You are attributing humanity to protoplasm. It is anti-human, anti-life and misogyny.

You simply cannot handle this topic because you are not in reality.

My position is that abortion is a crime but given the complexity of the situation that it should be a Class "C" misdemeanor with no jail time. So... No.

 

[ding]

Citations are not arguments, ChatGPT.

Sure they are.

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:

“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”

 

[ding]

i

I see clearly that she understands science, plus the distinction that DNA has nothing to do with sanctity of life.

Humans bodies are part of the animal kingdom, and in particular quite similar to mammals.

There is distinction between “life” in all mammals and the “sanctity of life” that is uniquely associated only with humans within most of civilized society.

Jews have contributed greatly to the civilization of a mankind and for probably 1400 years from the birth of Christ Christians were never of the opinion that the sanctity of life begins at conception

St. Thomas Aquinas did not believe that.

He believe life started much more closely to the law that was in shrine for 50 years under Roe versus Wade.

Most protestants supported Roe Wade in 1973


you claimed that America was founded as a Christian nation, which has to mean that Jewish belief that comes from a God who accepts human beings who believed for 6000 years that life begins like birth.

So what science tells you that the sanctity of life begins at conception?

This is a human rights argument, not a religious arguement.

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:

“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”

 

[Trickster]

I, as an atheist, can only speak for myself. I don't read it or even have time to waste on reading it.

I take my information from you and others like you who have thrown out the creation, etc. nonsense. We should get together to work on Meriweather. She's intelligent enough for us to be confident that she can be moved!

Let's not waste anymore time on the 'airhead' literal believers who know that the Ark is still up on Mt. Ararat!

Meriweather is probably a nice person, but they will not change their mind on this. I think the best thing to hope for is that the anti-abortion lurkers might read a post that has them question their position. They are my audience.

 

[Trickster]

This is a human rights argument, not a religious arguement.

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:

Aren't you against IVF?

 

[ding]

Aren't you against IVF?

Why would I be? I'm not a zealot like you.

 

[ding]

Meriweather is probably a nice person, but they will not change their mind on this. I think the best thing to hope for is that the anti-abortion lurkers might read a post that has them question their position. They are my audience.

You aren't doing a very good job.

 

[Donald H]

Meriweather is probably a nice person, but they will not change their mind on this. I think the best thing to hope for is that the anti-abortion lurkers might read a post that has them question their position. They are my audience.

Never say never. Ding used to be as convinced as Meri on the Christian hoax. Now he's our most valuable denialist asset on religious pranking an hoaxing!

 

[ding]

Never say never. Ding used to be as convinced as Meri on the Christian hoax. Now he's our most valuable denialist asset on religious pranking an hoaxing!

Your trolling is poor, bro. Be better.

 

[Trickster]

My position is that abortion is a crime but given the complexity of the situation that it should be a Class "C" misdemeanor with no jail time. So... No.

This still does not make any sense given your premise.

It sounds more like you are acknowledging the fact a ZEF is not a human and more view its legal status as that of an animal and view abortion as closer to animal abuse than murder.

That argument is dumb too, but would at least be logically consistent.

 

[ding]

Thist still does not make any sense given your premise. It sounds more like you are acknowledging the fact a ZEF is not human and more view its legal as that of an animal and view abprtion as closer tp animal abuse than murder.

That argument is dumb too, but would at least be logically consistent.

Incorrect.

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:

“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”

 

[Trickster]

You aren't doing a very good job.

OK Mr.Forensics.

 

[ding]

OK Mr.Forensics.

I give Donald H 's trolling capabilities a "D" at best but I give you an "F" for science and integrity.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

This is a human rights argument, not a religious arguement.

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. says “The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”

what I say as a high school graduate 57 years ago Shettles It’s not referring to “sanctity of life“ he is referring to biological life.

So what scientist has confirmed for you Saint ding that the sanctity of life begins at conception?

 

[ding]

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. says “The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”

what I say as a high school graduate 57 years ago Shettles It’s not referring to “sanctity of life“ he is referring to biological life.

So what scientist has confirmed for you Saint ding that the sanctity of life begins at conception?

This isn't a religious discussion, dummy. The sanctity of life has no place in this discussion. Neither do souls. Just hard scientific empirical evidence such as a new genetically distinct human being is created at fertilization.

 

[MarcATL]

What Scripture texts are you basing your premise on OP?

Are you going to provide it/them or do we just take your word for it?