Trickster
Gold Member
Only women get pregnant.They don’t need equivalency. If abortion is birth control, and only thr woman has the control, she must be responsible
This is a complicated issue to be discussed in a different thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only women get pregnant.They don’t need equivalency. If abortion is birth control, and only thr woman has the control, she must be responsible
And only women control whether they are pregnant or not.Only women get pregnant.
This is a complicated issue to be discussed in a different thread.
Are you slutshaming again?And only women control whether they are pregnant or not.
It’s really not that complicated regardless.
Women agonizing over their decision to have an abortion or not has absolutely nothing to do with me, drama queen.You really suck at understanding emotions. Abortion can be a very hard decision for a couple of reasons:
- Garbage human beings like you push the discourse in a manner that causes her unnecessary shame.
- She wanted a child, but had to abort due to complications.
- She lives in a primitive state and took a big risk having it.
None of this changes the nature of an abortion though, so I do not know why ypu bring it up.
A ZEF has no rights.
Do you think they celebrate their abortions?Atr you a woman?
So you think making an abortion a Class "C" misdemeanor with no jail time is too severe of a penalty?" Hurting Perpetrators Of Victimless Crimes To Help Them Feel Better "
* Ding Dong Advocates For Damned Dirty Apes - We Are Government To Make It Worse *
We have all noted the ding dong solution to instantiate the public susceptibility to anthropocentric psychosis .
Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?
Militant atheists don't know how to read the bible. They only know how to read Marx.Your bible says otherwise.
Is the bible the word of the god?
I think it's time to ask you if you've broken free of religious superstitious beliefs?
You've finally spoken out against many of the lies that we've been working on correcting. You're ballpark estimate on the age of the earth has dispensed with a major whopper.
. Do you think they celebrate their abortions?
lol, is this how you run when I punch holes big enough to drive a truck through in your argument?Are you slutshaming again?
This is a human rights issue. It's not a religious issue.No. Its a quality of life decision made to suit them, not you or the Catholic Church. Their choice does no harm to you or to your church’s beliefs or to the state.
The proper exercise of separation of church in the public square by state snd by the church is for the government to stay out of it and bear no disfavor to women who make their decision. treat them as equals to women who choose to give birth if they get pregnant. Because they are. churches are free to ban or excommunicate women who have an abortion, but it is not a sin. For a catholic like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to believe the government should have no role enforcing the Catholic belief that the sanity of life begins at conception.
That is an irrational belief by people who believe the God of Abraham revealed himself to mankind and sect his son to die for the sins that all mankind commit from yjr moment they are conceived. Except one time when a woman was inseminated by Thr God of Abraham and delivered Him a Son although she remained a virgin or a woman without exprerirncing an orgasm by the penis of a man.
Nature’s God created orgasms.
Do you think wonen enjoy having them?
or is it none of your business?
This is a human rights issue. It's not a religious issue.
Because churches consist of human beings and human beings have human rights.WKBN.comhttps://www.wkbn.com › news › ohioOhio religious groups divided on abortion, Issue 1 | WKBN.com
Jul 17, 2023 · Joining the Catholic bishops in its opposition to the abortion-rights amendment is theState Convention of Baptists Ohio, a group
Why is there divison in the church if it is not a religious issue?
I have not seen you punch holes into any opponent's arguments. In factm you have not even properly addressed mine and you went to hiding for a while, but are now back with the same irrelevant nonse about DNA and "life begins at conception".lol, is this how you run when I punch holes big enough to drive a truck through in your argument?![]()
Does life scientifically begin at conception?I have not seen you punch holes into any opponent's arguments. In factm you have not even properly addressed mine and you went to hiding for a while, but are now back with the same irrelevant nonse about DNA and "life begins at conception".
You need to go back and properly answer posts with more than one-sentence-replies before throwing emojia at me.
Nope. There is life before conception too.
"Peer-reviewed journals in the biological and life sciences literature have published articles that represent the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization ("the fertilization view"). As those statements are typically offered without explanation or citation, the fertilization view seems to be uncontested by the editors, reviewers, and authors who contribute to scientific journals. However, Americans are split on whether the fertilization view is a "philosophical or religious belief" (45%) or a "biological and scientific fact" (46%), and only 38% of Americans view fertilization as the starting point of a human's life. In the two studies that explored experts' views on the matter, the fertilization view was the most popular perspective held by public health and IVF professionals. Since a recent study suggested that 80% of Americans view biologists as the group most qualified to determine when a human's life begins, experts in biology were surveyed to provide a new perspective to the literature on experts' views on this matter. Biologists from 1,058 academic institutions around the world assessed survey items on when a human's life begins and, overall, 96% (5337 out of 5577) affirmed the fertilization view. The founding principles of the field Science Communication suggest that scientists have an ethical and professional obligation to inform Americans, as well as people around the world, about scientific developments so members of the public can be empowered to make life decisions that are consistent with the best information available. Given that perspective-and a recent study's finding that a majority of Americans believe they deserve to know when a human's life begins in order to make informed reproductive decisions-science communicators should work to increase the level of science awareness on the fertilization view, as it stands alone as the leading biological perspective on when a human's life begins."I have not seen you punch holes into any opponent's arguments. In factm you have not even properly addressed mine and you went to hiding for a while, but are now back with the same irrelevant nonse about DNA and "life begins at conception".
You need to go back and properly answer posts with more than one-sentence-replies before throwing emojia at me.
No new genetically distinct human life exists before conception. You are being a zealot and ignoring the science.Nope. There is life before conception too.
There is life before conception-- sperm cells and egg cells.No new genetically distinct human life exists before conception. You are being a zealot and ignoring the science.
Which have the DNA of the father and mother, dummy. Learn some science.There is life before conception-- sperm cells and egg cells.