Abortion and the Constitution

" Diverting From Revulsion Of The Citizen And Citizenship "

* Tell Us About It *

How about sexual mutilation of children, bigamy, incest or sale of human organs? How do these fit into your unsupported generalization?
Most techniques involve removing the entire foreskin over the glans, including the division of the frenulum. Controversy still reigns as to the ideal extent of preputial preservation during circumcision.

In our technique, we remove the phimotic foreskin but avoid disturbing the frenulum and its adjoining web.


 
This is a case where no government has the right to control women's personal.health choices
A reason would have to be cited to interfere in issues of personal autonomy. Such as the extinction of the human race. I think not , if anything the birth rate is threatening all of our lives. Overpopulation is the world's unspoken biggest problem. It creates all the other problems. In a united and sensible world couples would be limited to one child until the population gets down to a sustainable level. Which is at best 4 billion this beleaguered little planet. We're more than double that already. More isn't always better and the slight discomforts Americans are feeling now will only get worse until we get this under control and restricting abortion isn't helping any citizen.
Murdering a baby is NOT a health choice.
 
" Sanctimonious Sacrosanct Anthropocentric Psychopathic Revulsion Of Us Citizens And Citizenship "

* Dumb Ass Lack Of Reasoning By Traitors Against Us Republic Who Support Sedition Against Us Constitution *

Murdering a baby is NOT a health choice.
A baby has completed live birth and is about 4 months old and therefore has constitutional protections , where live birth is a requirement for equal protection with a us citizen , and therefore a baby can not technically be aborted .

Apparently the abortion anti-choice are too stupid to acknowledge developmental anomalies as a health choice , or as life , liberty and pursuit of happiness entitled to us citizens , because their goad does not ever make mistakes .

Go cry and complain to yearn goad about mortality , or could a conjectural immortal have concern for something separate from itself , about which it therefore could not understand ?
 
Voters in 3 states that voted for Trump voted in favor of abortion rights. That should satisfy anti choice folk.
 
" Sanctimonious Sacrosanct Anthropocentric Psychopathic Revulsion Of Us Citizens And Citizenship "

* Dumb Ass Lack Of Reasoning By Traitors Against Us Republic Who Support Sedition Against Us Constitution *


A baby has completed live birth and is about 4 months old and therefore has constitutional protections , where live birth is a requirement for equal protection with a us citizen , and therefore a baby can not technically be aborted .

Apparently the abortion anti-choice are too stupid to acknowledge developmental anomalies as a health choice , or as life , liberty and pursuit of happiness entitled to us citizens , because their goad does not ever make mistakes .

Go cry and complain to yearn goad about mortality , or could a conjectural immortal have concern for something separate from itself , about which it therefore could not understand ?
DuckSpeak.
 
" Clueless Rhetoric Of States Rites For Traitors To Revile Us Citizens And Citizenship "

* Dumbfounded Dogma For Sedition Against Us Republic *


States cannot abrogate the enumerated rite of equal protection and states cannot abrogate the requirement of live birth to become a us citizen that consequently requires a live birth for equal protection with a us citizen .

Abortion is a non enumerated rite because a state cannot grant equal protection to any which has not met a live birth requirement to receive it .

Stop reviling us citizens and us citizenship !

Stop sedition against us republic !
More gibberish.
 
Personal Responsibility ,for instance?
Personal responsibility and rational behavior during sexual encounters? Are you a virgin? Have you ever experienced sexual ecstasy?

Hint: There is nothing rational about it. It's all instinctive (not rational) behavior.
 
Personal responsibility and rational behavior during sexual encounters? Are you a virgin? Have you ever experienced sexual ecstasy?

Hint: There is nothing rational about it. It's all instinctive (not rational) behavior.
I was married for 31 years. And Humans are not Insects who go by "Instinct". Humans are supposed to be reasoning beings. Promiscuous sex is pure animal. Good for spreading AIDS and VD. And getting knocked up.
 
I was married for 31 years. And Humans are not Insects who go by "Instinct". Humans are supposed to be reasoning beings. Promiscuous sex is pure animal. Good for spreading AIDS and VD. And getting knocked up.
What humans are supposed to be and what they actually are seem to be 2 different things in my opinion.

Like it or not, these bodies we inhabit were put here to reproduce. There certainly may be an intellectual angle to sexual relations, but it is for the most part purely instinctual, purely biological, both sexes.
 
Setting aside personal preferences, it is clear that the federal government does not have Constitutional authority to regulate abortions. Thus, that power resides with the States. However, the federal does have the authority to define "persons" as referred to in the 14th Amendment. I wonder if this might become an issue in the future. What do you think?
The state had the duty to define what a person was before allowing the termination of being that may be a person, but they failed to do so.

At the end of the day, abortion today is like slavery in the 1800's. There were no attempts to define whether blacks were people when it might result them losing their free labor? So long as those in power can use and abuse a segment of society they see fit abusing for financial benefit, they will do it. It is just human nature

Abortion is no different as most women seek abortions for financial reasons.

Ancient man was no different. People routinely sacrificed their children to the gods in the hopes of better crops, victory at war, or ironically enough, better fertility, etc.

The Jewish massacres were also rooted in greed as the Jews were rounded up, stripped of their gold and worldly possessions, and sent off to die in concentration camps.

In this world, man will slit your throat to make a buck. It is the way it has always been.
 
What humans are supposed to be and what they actually are seem to be 2 different things in my opinion.

Like it or not, these bodies we inhabit were put here to reproduce. There certainly may be an intellectual angle to sexual relations, but it is for the most part purely instinctual, purely biological, both sexes.
And common sense should prevail. Promiscuous sex leads to VD and AIDS. And ,unfortunately ,unwanted children. If trampy women would just say NO ,this would not happen.
 
And common sense should prevail. Promiscuous sex leads to VD and AIDS. And ,unfortunately ,unwanted children. If trampy women would just say NO ,this would not happen.
Are you suggesting that Utopia is an option in legislation?
 
The state had the duty to define what a person was before allowing the termination of being that may be a person, but they failed to do so.

At the end of the day, abortion today is like slavery in the 1800's. There were no attempts to define whether blacks were people when it might result them losing their free labor? So long as those in power can use and abuse a segment of society they see fit abusing for financial benefit, they will do it. It is just human nature

Abortion is no different as most women seek abortions for financial reasons.

Ancient man was no different. People routinely sacrificed their children to the gods in the hopes of better crops, victory at war, or ironically enough, better fertility, etc.

The Jewish massacres were also rooted in greed as the Jews were rounded up, stripped of their gold and worldly possessions, and sent off to die in concentration camps.

In this world, man will slit your throat to make a buck. It is the way it has always been.
I wonder what legal document establishes the state's duty to define what a person is? Certainly there is nothing like that in the US Constitution, so the federal government has no such lawful duty. Where do you find that in a state constitution?
 
I wonder what legal document establishes the state's duty to define what a person is? Certainly there is nothing like that in the US Constitution, so the federal government has no such lawful duty. Where do you find that in a state constitution?
The government does not even know what a woman is, so how in the hell will they tell us what it means to be a human being?

Hmm?

It sure sucks being governed by a bunch of disingenuous genocidal retards.
 
Back
Top Bottom