- Thread starter
- #41
Gibberish.Abortion is a non enumerated constitutional rite that exists from the enumerated rites
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gibberish.Abortion is a non enumerated constitutional rite that exists from the enumerated rites
Because he has read and understood the one sentence that is the Ninth Amendment?If you think abortion should be a Constitutional right, why don't you pursue an Amendment to that effect?
It was too difficult for the Roe v. Wade Court to understand.Because he has read and understood the one sentence that is the Ninth Amendment?
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be used to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Is that too difficult for you to understand?
Yes , gibberish is the best abortion anti-choice can present .Gibberish.
The blackmun understood the constitutional requirement of live birth to become a us citizen and for equal protection .It was too difficult for the Roe v. Wade Court to understand.
I was going to ask if he/she/they tried English lessons . . .Have you tried Ex-Lax?
Roe was decided as a due process issue when it wasn't. The Ninth was not mentioned at all in the decision.It was too difficult for the Roe v. Wade Court to understand.
So you think SCOTUS is a legislative body?The court ended up making the right decision, but for the wrong reason.
How about we encourage and educate them on not having kids.Even though I am not going to pay your financial needs for the rest of your life, I am against your murder. That said, there are lots of programs to support mother's and children. Also, there are lots of pregnancy centers that are supported by "We People" that aid pregnant moms during pregnancy and after birth with their babies. There are also many "We People" that adopt children.
That is the Dem Creed.Imagine sitting down with George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and John Adams. You must convince them that killing her child is the most important thing a woman will ever do in her life.
That is easy. Don't be promiscuous.How about we encourage and educate them on not having kids.
Even married couples perhaps need not procreate.That is easy. Don't be promiscuous.
All families should be 2 Parent. With one Parent staying home during formative years.Even married couples perhaps need not procreate.
The scotus is an arbitrator which makes judicial decisions based on constitutional law .So you think SCOTUS is a legislative body?
States cannot abrogate the enumerated rite of equal protection and states cannot abrogate the requirement of live birth to become a us citizen that consequently requires a live birth for equal protection with a us citizen .It's in the hands of each states voters. This is where it should be. Each state sets its own restrictions levels. Where's the problem here? Even president Trump promoted this.
Do you always ask silly questions? Of course I don't think it's a legislative body, but look what has happened since 1967 and Pierson v. Ray when SCOTUS advanced the sophistry of Qualified Immunity. That horrible decision had the effect of legislation and has caused only harm to society and the police.So you think SCOTUS is a legislative body?
Insult, divert, dissemble, repeat.Do you always ask silly questions? Of course I don't think it's a legislative body, but look what has happened since 1967 and Pierson v. Ray when SCOTUS advanced the sophistry of Qualified Immunity. That horrible decision had the effect of legislation and has caused only harm to society and the police.
This is a case where no government has the right to control women's personal.health choicesSetting aside personal preferences, it is clear that the federal government does not have Constitutional authority to regulate abortions. Thus, that power resides with the States. However, the federal does have the authority to define "persons" as referred to in the 14th Amendment. I wonder if this might become an issue in the future. What do you think?
How about sexual mutilation of children, bigamy, incest or sale of human organs? How do these fit into your unsupported generalization?This is a case where no government has the right to control women's personal.health choices