Still pushing the same falsehood
That is so left of you...
Well at least you didn't say Fox News, this time
to make it sound bigger than it was....
1) You must mean Mark Foley
2) It was onscreen texts in a segment that labeled Foley a Democrat on
the O'Reilly Factor, not the main news
Besides, in the segment, where this "great conspiracy" occurred
“In the ‘Personal Story’ segment tonight [of the O'Reilly show] the conservative Washington Times today called for the resignation of
House Speaker Dennis Hastert over the Foley scandal,” reported O’Reilly. “The issue, it seems, is dividing conservatives.”
3) "Bending over" as you said in an earlier post , there was never accusations by the House that Mark Foley actually had sexual relations
4) Granted the Democrats were able to make political hay out of the sex scandal involving Rep. Mark Foley.
Of course their "outrage" is very selective. For example the Democrats were not as outraged when a Democrat, Gerry Studds,
had a sexual liaison with a House of Representative's 17-year-old male page. In fact, Gerry Studds, actually accused the
House of Representatives of invading his privacy. Studds was not just communicating with the boy, but involved in a sexual affair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really, if one attempts to spin they need to make sure their
information is factual enough to be plausible. Granted, truth to the Left is never
very important and tends to be against them; but, the lie still needs to be plausible.
No doubt "you people", as you say, need to rework this line of defense of the MSM.
This one should go back into the hopper...
Strange how an "ex Republican" knows the spin form Media Matters
so well
Funny how that works