A Study Shows VERY FEW Capitol Hill Rioters Were QAnon Red-Staters With Ties to 'Right-Wing' Groups

There was plenty of reason for the skepticism, considering the collusion between Big Tech, unions, lawfare, and Democrats’ combined efforts to sway the election. Those efforts were at the very least unethical.

Hardly was anything done as described, your side lost, deal with it and try not using the unhealthy methods that a fat sore loser taught you.
Your side cheated their asses off--------corrupt FBI and intimidated judges, Bezos, the Chinese, BLM thugs, and anti-fa criminals

Sadly this is also how the Hitler socialists took over---a combination of the corrupt law enforcement included the Gestapo members, super rich, Catholic thugs, and CRIMINALS where their core as well
 
Once again, leftwing talking points are shown to be horseshit:

A survey by the University of Chicago finds that most Capitol Hill rioters had no ties to any fringe right-wing groups and were merely engaged people outraged by what they believed was a rigged election.
While colorful weirdos with names such as QAnon Shaman and Baked Alaska stole the headlines, people who were arrested by federal officials during and after the riot were a “broader core of people” with a healthy skepticism about the veracity of the November 2020 election, according to the study.
There was plenty of reason for the skepticism, considering the collusion between Big Tech, unions, lawfare, and Democrats’ combined efforts to sway the election. Those efforts were at the very least unethical.
As Time Magazine enthused in an article entitled, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” “there was a conspiracy unfolding behind the [election] scenes” of an “informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans” to “save” the election from Donald Trump.
Rather than being ill-informed, it appears that the Capitol Building rioters may have been better informed than most on these moves to sway the election.
In a “working paper” that is considered to be a “novel approach” to “estimating community-level participation in mass protest events,” Asst. Prof. Austin Wright of the Harris School of Public Policy and David Van Dijcke of the University of Michigan found a surprising number of the people arrested at the Capitol Hill riot who were business owners and other professionals obviously upset over election fraud....
Doesn't matter... if you participated in the Insurrection (assault against the Capitol Building and the Congress of the United States in the process of formally certifying a Presidential election) rather than merely demonstrating peacefully outside of the Capitol Building... then... regardless of affiliation... you are going to be crucified in the criminal law courts. Rightfully so. This must never happen again. The Law, in all its might and majesty, is being brought to bear against such traitorous scum who failed to keep faith with the Constitution and the Rule of Law. Sic semper stupidus.
more than 99,000 Republicans demonstrated peacefully, NAZI. 300 were arrested. The only crime most of them committed is trespassing. Perhaps 3 of them were members of QAnon.
 
How did those tresspassers control the United States? I have never heard this explained by a liberal.

OIEMTDKNSFDFVCPDWBSTQZC2D4.jpg

Once again, look at this photo. AN INSURRECTION? STFU.
 
Once again, leftwing talking points are shown to be horseshit:

A survey by the University of Chicago finds that most Capitol Hill rioters had no ties to any fringe right-wing groups and were merely engaged people outraged by what they believed was a rigged election.
While colorful weirdos with names such as QAnon Shaman and Baked Alaska stole the headlines, people who were arrested by federal officials during and after the riot were a “broader core of people” with a healthy skepticism about the veracity of the November 2020 election, according to the study.
There was plenty of reason for the skepticism, considering the collusion between Big Tech, unions, lawfare, and Democrats’ combined efforts to sway the election. Those efforts were at the very least unethical.
As Time Magazine enthused in an article entitled, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” “there was a conspiracy unfolding behind the [election] scenes” of an “informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans” to “save” the election from Donald Trump.
Rather than being ill-informed, it appears that the Capitol Building rioters may have been better informed than most on these moves to sway the election.
In a “working paper” that is considered to be a “novel approach” to “estimating community-level participation in mass protest events,” Asst. Prof. Austin Wright of the Harris School of Public Policy and David Van Dijcke of the University of Michigan found a surprising number of the people arrested at the Capitol Hill riot who were business owners and other professionals obviously upset over election fraud....
How is that a good thing? That means that people who aren't considered "extremists" stormed the capital. That kind of makes them extremists by default.
And inherently violent.
You mean "inherently violent" like these people?
iu

iu
 
Still quoting full of shit alt-right media. Sorry, the people, groups, and grievances have all been identified. The only thing that remains is rooting out everyone present who was there to identify them as the traitors they are. All in good time.

Notice the game they (try to) play:

If you're not an official, card-carrying member of some right wing nutter group, then no one can say you agree with, sympathize with, spin for, attack for, or enable that group.

And then they expect people to fall for it. :laugh:

You mean you can claim without any proof that I am a member QAnon?

Answer: No
 
Last edited:
Once again, leftwing talking points are shown to be horseshit:

A survey by the University of Chicago finds that most Capitol Hill rioters had no ties to any fringe right-wing groups and were merely engaged people outraged by what they believed was a rigged election.
While colorful weirdos with names such as QAnon Shaman and Baked Alaska stole the headlines, people who were arrested by federal officials during and after the riot were a “broader core of people” with a healthy skepticism about the veracity of the November 2020 election, according to the study.
There was plenty of reason for the skepticism, considering the collusion between Big Tech, unions, lawfare, and Democrats’ combined efforts to sway the election. Those efforts were at the very least unethical.
As Time Magazine enthused in an article entitled, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” “there was a conspiracy unfolding behind the [election] scenes” of an “informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans” to “save” the election from Donald Trump.
Rather than being ill-informed, it appears that the Capitol Building rioters may have been better informed than most on these moves to sway the election.
In a “working paper” that is considered to be a “novel approach” to “estimating community-level participation in mass protest events,” Asst. Prof. Austin Wright of the Harris School of Public Policy and David Van Dijcke of the University of Michigan found a surprising number of the people arrested at the Capitol Hill riot who were business owners and other professionals obviously upset over election fraud....

Wow, quoting pjmedia.com on anything. And this article tries to justify the insurection itself. It tries to minimize the crime. Sorry, but each and every one that entered that building needs to spend a whole bunch of time with 3 squares, a cot, and a cell mate named Bubba.
In 2013 trump tweeted, “leadership, whatever happens you’re responsible”

On that day trump was their leader. He told them to storm the capitol violently. To cover his ass one time he said be nice but the rest of the speech was inciting a mob to riot.

So it’s funny today trump say he’s not responsible for the 5 deaths. So much for that 2013 tweet about leadership.
You didn't even listen to the speech, you have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Still quoting full of shit alt-right media. Sorry, the people, groups, and grievances have all been identified. The only thing that remains is rooting out everyone present who was there to identify them as the traitors they are. All in good time.

Notice the game they (try to) play:

If you're not an official, card-carrying member of some right wing nutter group, then no one can say you agree with, sympathize with, spin for, attack for, or enable that group.

And then they expect people to fall for it. :laugh:

You mean can you claim without any proof that I am a member QAnon?

Answer: No

Obviously my post was a little complicated for you.

I am shocked. I am just shocked. I am really shocked.

I'm just freakin' shocked over here.
 
Still quoting full of shit alt-right media. Sorry, the people, groups, and grievances have all been identified. The only thing that remains is rooting out everyone present who was there to identify them as the traitors they are. All in good time.

Notice the game they (try to) play:

If you're not an official, card-carrying member of some right wing nutter group, then no one can say you agree with, sympathize with, spin for, attack for, or enable that group.

And then they expect people to fall for it. :laugh:

You mean can you claim without any proof that I am a member QAnon?

Answer: No

Obviously my post was a little complicated for you.

I am shocked. I am just shocked. I am really shocked.

I'm just freakin' shocked over here.


What middle finger baby doesn't (or won't) get (he has me on ignore) is that he can post all the pictures of protests that got out of hand and devolved into property damage (which I don't condone) he would like.
NONE of these protests turned ugly were rooted in the belief that a free and fair election was stolen. None of these protests attempted to halt a Constitutional process with the intent on forcing politicians to declare
said election null and void and installing the opponent as the victor. Is he Q-Anon? Don't know, but nothing would surprise me.
 
Still quoting full of shit alt-right media. Sorry, the people, groups, and grievances have all been identified. The only thing that remains is rooting out everyone present who was there to identify them as the traitors they are. All in good time.

Notice the game they (try to) play:

If you're not an official, card-carrying member of some right wing nutter group, then no one can say you agree with, sympathize with, spin for, attack for, or enable that group.

And then they expect people to fall for it. :laugh:

You mean can you claim without any proof that I am a member QAnon?

Answer: No

Obviously my post was a little complicated for you.

I am shocked. I am just shocked. I am really shocked.

I'm just freakin' shocked over here.


What middle finger baby doesn't (or won't) get (he has me on ignore) is that he can post all the pictures of protests that got out of hand and devolved into property damage (which I don't condone) he would like.
NONE of these protests turned ugly were rooted in the belief that a free and fair election was stolen. None of these protests attempted to halt a Constitutional process with the intent on forcing politicians to declare
said election null and void and installing the opponent as the victor. Is he Q-Anon? Don't know, but nothing would surprise me.

They have to deflect and downplay the domestic terrorist attack aimed at the heart of our electoral process.

Fine with me :popcorn:
 
Still quoting full of shit alt-right media. Sorry, the people, groups, and grievances have all been identified. The only thing that remains is rooting out everyone present who was there to identify them as the traitors they are. All in good time.

Notice the game they (try to) play:

If you're not an official, card-carrying member of some right wing nutter group, then no one can say you agree with, sympathize with, spin for, attack for, or enable that group.

And then they expect people to fall for it. :laugh:

You mean can you claim without any proof that I am a member QAnon?

Answer: No

Obviously my post was a little complicated for you.

I am shocked. I am just shocked. I am really shocked.

I'm just freakin' shocked over here.

It was quite simple, actually.
 
Still quoting full of shit alt-right media. Sorry, the people, groups, and grievances have all been identified. The only thing that remains is rooting out everyone present who was there to identify them as the traitors they are. All in good time.

Notice the game they (try to) play:

If you're not an official, card-carrying member of some right wing nutter group, then no one can say you agree with, sympathize with, spin for, attack for, or enable that group.

And then they expect people to fall for it. :laugh:

You mean can you claim without any proof that I am a member QAnon?

Answer: No

Obviously my post was a little complicated for you.

I am shocked. I am just shocked. I am really shocked.

I'm just freakin' shocked over here.


What middle finger baby doesn't (or won't) get (he has me on ignore) is that he can post all the pictures of protests that got out of hand and devolved into property damage (which I don't condone) he would like.
NONE of these protests turned ugly were rooted in the belief that a free and fair election was stolen. None of these protests attempted to halt a Constitutional process with the intent on forcing politicians to declare
said election null and void and installing the opponent as the victor. Is he Q-Anon? Don't know, but nothing would surprise me.

They have to deflect and downplay the domestic terrorist attack aimed at the heart of our electoral process.

Fine with me :popcorn:

I'm not downplaying anything. I have stated irrefutable facts. Your hyperbolic language only shows that you're a demagogue trying to stir up hatred against Republicans.
 
Last edited:
There was plenty of reason for the skepticism, considering the collusion between Big Tech, unions, lawfare, and Democrats’ combined efforts to sway the election. Those efforts were at the very least unethical.

Hardly was anything done as described, your side lost, deal with it and try not using the unhealthy methods that a fat sore loser taught you.

PROGS prefer to entertain lowest common denominators. In PROG, HUNDREDS of people in a single incident is the same as MILLIONS over many incidents. The fucking thing was probably staged anyhow.
 
Still quoting full of shit alt-right media. Sorry, the people, groups, and grievances have all been identified. The only thing that remains is rooting out everyone present who was there to identify them as the traitors they are. All in good time.

Notice the game they (try to) play:

If you're not an official, card-carrying member of some right wing nutter group, then no one can say you agree with, sympathize with, spin for, attack for, or enable that group.

And then they expect people to fall for it. :laugh:

You mean can you claim without any proof that I am a member QAnon?

Answer: No

Obviously my post was a little complicated for you.

I am shocked. I am just shocked. I am really shocked.

I'm just freakin' shocked over here.


What middle finger baby doesn't (or won't) get (he has me on ignore) is that he can post all the pictures of protests that got out of hand and devolved into property damage (which I don't condone) he would like.
NONE of these protests turned ugly were rooted in the belief that a free and fair election was stolen. None of these protests attempted to halt a Constitutional process with the intent on forcing politicians to declare
said election null and void and installing the opponent as the victor. Is he Q-Anon? Don't know, but nothing would surprise me.

They have to deflect and downplay the domestic terrorist attack aimed at the heart of our electoral process.

Fine with me :popcorn:

I'm not downplaying anything. I have stated irrefutable facts. Your hyperbolic language only shows that you're a demagogue trying to stir up hatred against Republicans.

You continue lying about how many people attended Trump's rally and march. Your irrefutable facts are usually irrefutable lies, big gigantic lies. You turn 30,000 people into 99,000 or 100,000.
 
Once again, leftwing talking points are shown to be horseshit:

A survey by the University of Chicago finds that most Capitol Hill rioters had no ties to any fringe right-wing groups and were merely engaged people outraged by what they believed was a rigged election.
While colorful weirdos with names such as QAnon Shaman and Baked Alaska stole the headlines, people who were arrested by federal officials during and after the riot were a “broader core of people” with a healthy skepticism about the veracity of the November 2020 election, according to the study.
There was plenty of reason for the skepticism, considering the collusion between Big Tech, unions, lawfare, and Democrats’ combined efforts to sway the election. Those efforts were at the very least unethical.
As Time Magazine enthused in an article entitled, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” “there was a conspiracy unfolding behind the [election] scenes” of an “informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans” to “save” the election from Donald Trump.
Rather than being ill-informed, it appears that the Capitol Building rioters may have been better informed than most on these moves to sway the election.
In a “working paper” that is considered to be a “novel approach” to “estimating community-level participation in mass protest events,” Asst. Prof. Austin Wright of the Harris School of Public Policy and David Van Dijcke of the University of Michigan found a surprising number of the people arrested at the Capitol Hill riot who were business owners and other professionals obviously upset over election fraud....
I tried to follow the links to this "survey" and gee...there was no survey.

Color me shocked
 

Forum List

Back
Top