A sobering question regarding US bombing Iran nuke program

[MarathonMike]

Their nuclear enrichment program is gone. That is a huge victory! But background radiation measurements do not reflect destroyed enriched uranium at the Fordow site. Haven't heard about the other two sites. It is likely they moved the enriched uranium and will possibly try to assemble some dirty bombs. Their religious fanaticism and pure hatred of Jews and America guarantees some sort of response. But this absolutely needed to happen. Iran has sponsored terror, death and destruction for decades. They are lead by religious lunatics.

 

[Robert W]

Their nuclear enrichment program is gone. That is a huge victory! But background radiation measurements do not reflect destroyed enriched uranium at the Fordow site. Haven't heard about the other two sites. It is likely they moved the enriched uranium and will possibly try to assemble some dirty bombs. Their religious fanaticism and pure hatred of Jews and America guarantees some sort of response. But this absolutely needed to happen. Iran has sponsored terror, death and destruction for decades. They are lead by religious lunatics.

All Democrats need to understand is this. Would their lives and family lives be safer had Iran kept enriching uranium far beyond civil use, where it is used only for nuclear weapons?

 

[Zavulon]

No such thing as a 'clean nuke.' That's why they've never been used since Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Do you know a pretty city Las Vegas? There is Nevada Nuclear Testing site nearby. Almost thousand of nukes were burst there. Of course, we can't say that the city is perfectly clean, it is not, but definitely fallouts is not its greatest problem.

 

[Zavulon]

They aren't going to be able to buy a hundred, two hundred, whatever, an unlimited number of nukes, like they could build if they still had a nuclear program.

At best they might be able to buy 1 or 2 from North Korea. But I'm not sure why even Fatboy Kim would want to do that.

With that few, they would need to hang onto them dearly. So they actually would be defensive devices then.

Until Israel covertly destroys them on the ground with drones or something anyway. Iran is not a popular regime and has a lot of internal opposition. We saw how Israel was able to send teams into Iran and wreak havoc at will.

Of course they can. If Russia ask 20% of Iranian gas and oil - its pretty large sum. They can afford it. And if Russia want Iran to win a local nuclear war on the Middle East, they need to deliver at least half of thousand of the tactical nukes.

 

[Zavulon]

All Democrats need to understand is this. Would their lives and family lives be safer had Iran kept enriching uranium far beyond civil use, where it is used only for nuclear weapons?

Its plain lie. There is civilian use even for 93,5% enriched Uranium.
And, anyway, will they'll be safer now, when NPT is over and Iran can buy modern nukes from Russia and China.

 

[Eman623]

Of course they can. If Russia ask 20% of Iranian gas and oil - its pretty large sum. They can afford it. And if Russia want Iran to win a local nuclear war on the Middle East, they need to deliver at least half of thousand of the tactical nukes.

Russia doesn't need Iranian oil. And I don't think Putin wants a nuclear Iran any more than anyone else does. The more nuclear countries there are, the more chance something goes bad.

But tell you what. Trump should tell Putin that if he sells nukes to Iran, we'll sell them to Ukraine. Check and mate.

 

[j-mac]

They can print their "concerns" at the paper, roll it and shove it deep in their rectums. There are potential civilian use even for high enriched Uranium, and it is Iran's right to enrich it for civilian purposes. You need proves, not "concerns" to start kill people and destroy treaties. There were no proves of Iran's guilt. No single one.

LOL....I don't have to prove shit to you....You think because you type utter bullshit, that makes it fact...You are a moron.

 

[MarathonMike]

All Democrats need to understand is this. Would their lives and family lives be safer had Iran kept enriching uranium far beyond civil use, where it is used only for nuclear weapons?

The Democratic Party DOES understand this. They have jumped the shark of Trump hate and they are dedicated to riding it into the depths. They are NOT an American Party, they should be viewed as a hostile regime that sows disinformation, manufactures one fake crisis after another and wants Americans divided and hating each other.

 

[j-mac]

I'm not a Jew. I'm a Russian. My father was a Jew, and half of my cousins are Jews. I don't hate Jews. I just think, that Israel's regime play very stupid and very dangerous games.

**** a Russian....Another global trouble maker.

 

[Zavulon]

Russia doesn't need Iranian oil.

Of course Russia needs it. May be not oil per se, but money and influence this oil can bring them. Anyway, they can't allow establishing pro-American regime on the southern coast of Caspian sea.

And I don't think Putin wants a nuclear Iran any more than anyone else does.

It might be lesser evil. Nuclear (with Russian nukes and depending on Russia for it maintaince) pro-Russian Iran with 20% of their oil and gas in Russian property is definitely better than non-nuclear, but pro-American Iran.

The more nuclear countries there are, the more chance something goes bad.

Yes, of course. That's why we should denuclearise some of now nuclear powers, like Britain, France and Israel. They shouldn't have nukes.

But tell you what. Trump should tell Putin that if he sells nukes to Iran, we'll sell them to Ukraine.

Trump doesn't have a lot of nukes to sell. Talking about non-strategical weapons it is only 400 of gravity bombs B61, America needs them in other places, and Ukraine won't be able to deliver them to the targets. Anyway, Russia will eliminate those nukes.

 

[dblack]

No matter. The stage is being set for the end time war that will bring most of the major powers to the 'plain of Megiddo'.

Bat shit insane.

 

[Zavulon]

**** a Russian....Another global trouble maker.

No. You are a trouble-maker. We are the trouble-solvers.

 

[j-mac]

What prototype?

WTF are you talking about here stupid?

You're the draft dodger, not I.

I served 6 years dumbass. You?

 

[Eman623]

I'm not a Jew. I'm a Russian. My father was a Jew, and half of my cousins are Jews. I don't hate Jews. I just think, that Israel's regime play very stupid and very dangerous games.

They live in a dangerous neighborhood. And it's not a game.

 

[Robert W]

Its plain lie. There is civilian use even for 93,5% enriched Uranium.
And, anyway, will they'll be safer now, when NPT is over and Iran can buy modern nukes from Russia and China.

The highest civil use for enriched uranium is in low-enriched uranium (below 20% uranium-235) for operating light water reactors, which make up almost 90% of nuclear electricity generation23. Highly enriched uranium (above 20% uranium-235) is used for the cores of many nuclear weapons and in breeder reactors

 

[j-mac]

No. You are a trouble-maker. We are the trouble-solvers.

You solve nothing....Hell, you've got your hands full with Ukrainians....We'd mop the floor with you.

 

[j-mac]

The highest civil use for enriched uranium is in low-enriched uranium (below 20% uranium-235) for operating light water reactors, which make up almost 90% of nuclear electricity generation23. Highly enriched uranium (above 20% uranium-235) is used for the cores of many nuclear weapons and in breeder reactors

He knows this shit, he's just talking shit, that he knows nothing about.

 

[Zavulon]

They live in a dangerous neighborhood. And it's not a game.

Basically, they made it dangerous.

 

[Zavulon]

The highest civil use for enriched uranium is in low-enriched uranium (below 20% uranium-235) for operating light water reactors, which make up almost 90% of nuclear electricity generation23. Highly enriched uranium (above 20% uranium-235) is used for the cores of many nuclear weapons and in breeder reactors

Also high enriched Uranium is used in naval reactors (up to 93,5%), in medical-isotope producing reactors and in research reactors.

 

[Eman623]

Of course Russia needs it. May be not oil per se, but money and influence this oil can bring them. Anyway, they can't allow establishing pro-American regime on the southern coast of Caspian sea.

It might be lesser evil. Nuclear (with Russian nukes and depending on Russia for it maintaince) pro-Russian Iran with 20% of their oil and gas in Russian property is definitely better than non-nuclear, but pro-American Iran.

That doesn't make sense. Russia is an oil exporter. They need to buy Iranian oil like Inuits need to buy snow and ice.

In fact, Iran has nothing of any significant value that Russia wants, besides intricately woven rugs maybe. And Russia absolutely does not want a nuclear Iran on the shores of the Caspian.

Yes, of course. That's why we should denuclearise some of now nuclear powers, like Britain, France and Israel. They shouldn't have nukes.

You should tell them that.

Trump doesn't have a lot of nukes to sell. Talking about non-strategical weapons it is only 400 of gravity bombs B61, America needs them in other places, and Ukraine won't be able to deliver them to the targets. Anyway, Russia will eliminate those nukes.

If we wanted to get a few nukes to Ukraine, we would. We may have already done so. Maybe that's why Putin has not used tactical nukes on Ukranian targets yet.