CDZ A Request for Information

[william the wie]

I was watching "With All Due Respect" on the Bloomberg website about an hour ago. A riot was reported, in passing, that happened at the Nevada state D convention. I have some questions:

Even though no one needed hospitalization there were purportedly numerous video postings by both the Clinton and Sanders factions and written posts. What little I saw of the evidence made it look like portraying either candidate as the leader of jack booted thugs an amazingly easy task. Will that hurt Hillary or Bernie worse in the general election vs. Trump?

Hillary as the chosen candidate of the DNC has a second problem Bill Clinton is becoming more of a loose cannon the longer the campaign runs?

The, at least one, poorly thrown chair was a near but definite miss and was thrown during the Sanders part of the riot. Will this play well in a general election?

In another helpful bit of economic news the claim was made that a president ending his second elected term will on average trigger a market downturn and if you go back to the 1830s a case can be made for this being true. Wall St. certainly thinks this is true because almost all financial institution contributions are going to Hillary. Can this factoid work no matter who the nominee is?

This will no doubt be one of the dirtiest elections in living memory. I still think Hillary is the great hope of the Libertarian Party and her coronation the biggest political error the Ds have ever made so will she still be electable after Trump indelibly tags her as Attila the Hen and so crooked she uses a pretzel as a straight edge?

 

[DarkFury]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

 

[Hossfly]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

Sanders side should have thrown some lead.

 

[william the wie]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

You do realize that every presidential election year many precincts report more D votes than registered voters in the precinct? By election day I expect both nominees to have favorable ratings @ -90%. That works in Hillary's favor.

 

[DarkFury]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

You do realize that every presidential election year many precincts report more D votes than registered voters in the precinct? By election day I expect both nominees to have favorable ratings @ -90%. That works in Hillary's favor.

They have already had violent floor fights. If they go to convention like that OR have a fight on the floor AT the convention 40% of the party {Sanders supporters} will balk.

She simply cannot afford that loss. On a side note Sanders and Trump AGREE on trade policy. So Sanders supporters MIGHT vote Trump to get part of what they want.

This is an inside the party fight not seen since the Whig/Republican split. Are they going to be the Democrat party OR the Socialist Democrat party?

 

[jon_berzerk]

I was watching "With All Due Respect" on the Bloomberg website about an hour ago. A riot was reported, in passing, that happened at the Nevada state D convention. I have some questions:

Even though no one needed hospitalization there were purportedly numerous video postings by both the Clinton and Sanders factions and written posts. What little I saw of the evidence made it look like portraying either candidate as the leader of jack booted thugs an amazingly easy task. Will that hurt Hillary or Bernie worse in the general election vs. Trump?

Hillary as the chosen candidate of the DNC has a second problem Bill Clinton is becoming more of a loose cannon the longer the campaign runs?

The, at least one, poorly thrown chair was a near but definite miss and was thrown during the Sanders part of the riot. Will this play well in a general election?

In another helpful bit of economic news the claim was made that a president ending his second elected term will on average trigger a market downturn and if you go back to the 1830s a case can be made for this being true. Wall St. certainly thinks this is true because almost all financial institution contributions are going to Hillary. Can this factoid work no matter who the nominee is?

This will no doubt be one of the dirtiest elections in living memory. I still think Hillary is the great hope of the Libertarian Party and her coronation the biggest political error the Ds have ever made so will she still be electable after Trump indelibly tags her as Attila the Hen and so crooked she uses a pretzel as a straight edge?

either way

leftists love violence to get their agenda across

 

[william the wie]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

You do realize that every presidential election year many precincts report more D votes than registered voters in the precinct? By election day I expect both nominees to have favorable ratings @ -90%. That works in Hillary's favor.

They have already had violent floor fights. If they go to convention like that OR have a fight on the floor AT the convention 40% of the party {Sanders supporters} will balk.

She simply cannot afford that loss. On a side note Sanders and Trump AGREE on trade policy. So Sanders supporters MIGHT vote Trump to get part of what they want.

This is an inside the party fight not seen since the Whig/Republican split. Are they going to be the Democrat party OR the Socialist Democrat party?

That question was decided by the McGovern campaign in 1972. The Ds campaign as "pragmatic" SDs.

 

[DarkFury]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

You do realize that every presidential election year many precincts report more D votes than registered voters in the precinct? By election day I expect both nominees to have favorable ratings @ -90%. That works in Hillary's favor.

They have already had violent floor fights. If they go to convention like that OR have a fight on the floor AT the convention 40% of the party {Sanders supporters} will balk.

She simply cannot afford that loss. On a side note Sanders and Trump AGREE on trade policy. So Sanders supporters MIGHT vote Trump to get part of what they want.

This is an inside the party fight not seen since the Whig/Republican split. Are they going to be the Democrat party OR the Socialist Democrat party?

That question was decided by the McGovern campaign in 1972. The Ds campaign as "pragmatic" SDs.

McGovern blew it with Eagleton. This is party control. And this time we are going to see either a split OR they will move far left.
Clinton/Sanders cannot unify. Not without one or both looking like an idiot or worse a liar.

 

[william the wie]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

You do realize that every presidential election year many precincts report more D votes than registered voters in the precinct? By election day I expect both nominees to have favorable ratings @ -90%. That works in Hillary's favor.

They have already had violent floor fights. If they go to convention like that OR have a fight on the floor AT the convention 40% of the party {Sanders supporters} will balk.

She simply cannot afford that loss. On a side note Sanders and Trump AGREE on trade policy. So Sanders supporters MIGHT vote Trump to get part of what they want.

This is an inside the party fight not seen since the Whig/Republican split. Are they going to be the Democrat party OR the Socialist Democrat party?

That question was decided by the McGovern campaign in 1972. The Ds campaign as "pragmatic" SDs.

McGovern blew it with Eagleton. This is party control. And this time we are going to see either a split OR they will move far left.
Clinton/Sanders cannot unify. Not without one or both looking like an idiot or worse a liar.

Sorry to be a grammar NAZI but shouldn't that read Idiot and liar?

 

[boedicca]

Hillary's side was throwing insults. Sanders side was throwing chairs. Economics wise it means no unity in the DNC thus no DNC president.

You do realize that every presidential election year many precincts report more D votes than registered voters in the precinct? By election day I expect both nominees to have favorable ratings @ -90%. That works in Hillary's favor.

You're forgetting that hiLIARy isn't at all likeable.

 

[william the wie]

Likability does not count with the graveyard vote, she has that demographic locked up.

 

[william the wie]

Here's hoping the Sanders crowd improve their aim prior to the convention but stick to low lethality missiles particularly with the cops. All that is needed is a few quotes of, "the DNC stole the nomination." a Body bag tally would take all the fun out of it.

 

[320 Years of History]

I was watching "With All Due Respect" on the Bloomberg website about an hour ago. A riot was reported, in passing, that happened at the Nevada state D convention. I have some questions:

Even though no one needed hospitalization there were purportedly numerous video postings by both the Clinton and Sanders factions and written posts. What little I saw of the evidence made it look like portraying either candidate as the leader of jack booted thugs an amazingly easy task. Will that hurt Hillary or Bernie worse in the general election vs. Trump?

Hillary as the chosen candidate of the DNC has a second problem Bill Clinton is becoming more of a loose cannon the longer the campaign runs?

The, at least one, poorly thrown chair was a near but definite miss and was thrown during the Sanders part of the riot. Will this play well in a general election?

In another helpful bit of economic news the claim was made that a president ending his second elected term will on average trigger a market downturn and if you go back to the 1830s a case can be made for this being true. Wall St. certainly thinks this is true because almost all financial institution contributions are going to Hillary. Can this factoid work no matter who the nominee is?

This will no doubt be one of the dirtiest elections in living memory. I still think Hillary is the great hope of the Libertarian Party and her coronation the biggest political error the Ds have ever made so will she still be electable after Trump indelibly tags her as Attila the Hen and so crooked she uses a pretzel as a straight edge?

So what exactly is the information you desire? I see your questions (black bold), but they look like requests for opinions and viewpoints rather than requests for information.

Blue:
I'm not even sure what be the question for which you want an answer.

 

[william the wie]

Just looking for more detail on ways to shred the D nominee so both houses of congress stay R.

 

[320 Years of History]

Just looking for more detail on ways to shred the D nominee so both houses of congress stay R.

Oh. Okay. Well, given that I've firmly decided I can't stand Trump and the Congressional folks who've "signed up" to back him, there's no way I'll contribute to that objective. TY, however, for clarifying what you seek. That's a display of integrity that goes beyond what I have observed from Trump and his cohorts. So kudos for that.

 

[william the wie]

Just looking for more detail on ways to shred the D nominee so both houses of congress stay R.

Oh. Okay. Well, given that I've firmly decided I can't stand Trump and the Congressional folks who've "signed up" to back him, there's no way I'll contribute to that objective. TY, however, for clarifying what you seek. That's a display of integrity that goes beyond what I have observed from Trump and his cohorts. So kudos for that.

I've been LP since 1980 after I finally decided anarcho-capitalism was not going to win..