A question for MAGA re: Epstein materials

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Chappaquiddick got me started detesting his sorry ass. I was a little kid who followed this stuff and he simply was a slime wad then.

No....Ted Kennedy was the "Lion of the Senate". I call him the "Liar of the Senate". He was lauded at length when he passed......so, even if they know, they don't seem to let it bother them.

I'd love to dig up his sorry carcass, shoot it and leave what's left of the buzzards if he was implicated and I trusted it.

Why don't you cut with the brain damage comments. You are not lecturing your grandkids.

Stop exhibiting it and I will.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Stop exhibiting it and I will.

GFYT

 

[Seymour Flops]

View attachment 1185808

Setting himself up for another humiliating defeat I see. What a glutton for punishment.

The plain language of the bill HE VOTED FOR gives the DOJ discretion to redact anything it deems might interfere with an investigation.

I've been trying to explain that for weeks, so you all would not be so disappoined.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

GFYT

KMA!

 

[citygator]

Setting himself up for another humiliating defeat I see. What a glutton for punishment.

The plain language of the bill HE VOTED FOR gives the DOJ discretion to redact anything it deems might interfere with an investigation.

I've been trying to explain that for weeks, so you all would not be so disappoined.

There was no open investigation. It was so police methodologies wouldnt be exposed. Then Trump opened an investigation after it passed. Sneaky.

 

[Seymour Flops]

There was no open investigation. It was so police methodologies wouldnt be exposed. Then Trump opened an investigation after it passed. Sneaky.

But didnt he tell them to investigate Democrats only?

Or was that another dishonest paraphrase by the media?

Anyway, partisanship aside, the police methodologies excuse is pretty lame. It is no big secret how the police operate. Then again, maybe they don't want to be too open about it.I don't know.

 

[MarcATL]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

If Trump pulled down his pants and shat in a MAGAT's mouth live on camera, they would tell the world that it was the best chocolate they've had in their lives.

That's where we're at w/these people.

 

[sparky]

for gawds sake.....stop playing into the drama folks.......~S~

 

[JoeB131]

Nope, everything went out the window when it comes to getting Trump. It would have been leaked, and then leaked some more.

Bullshit. Trump benefits from our unwillingness to prosecute the rich and powerful. This man should have gone to prison 100 times over for his various scams and crimes.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

As predictable as the sunrise....

 

[sparky]

Bullshit. Trump benefits from our unwillingness to prosecute the rich and powerful. This man should have gone to prison 100 times over for his various scams and crimes.

every administration in the last 2 centuries has sided with the the 'rich and powerful' Joe......have you been asleep?.... ~S~

 

[Nostra]

He promised and so did Bondi. It isn’t just me. MAGA wants answers.

So you want a King.

Weird.

 

[Nostra]

Make up WHAT?

Trump promised to his MAGAs to release Epstein files during the election, he then proceeded to fight their actual release tooth and nail.

If that doesn't look like conspicuous behavior to you then you are just ******* stupid, no two ways about it.

He is about to sign their release, Simp.

Promises made, promised kept.


Now, why did Biden cover up the Epstein files for four years?

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 1185808

The desperation is ******* hilarious.

 

[skye]

Yet, you never asked that question throughout the 4 years Biden was hiding the files.

Why?

And that's what I want to know too!

 

[skye]

 

[Missouri_Mike]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

So seems like you should have directed this at the democrats since there’s no chance you’re going to get Trump in anything but your own sure are being exposed.

 

[Winco]

Now, why did Biden cover up the Epstein files for four years?

 

[mudwhistle]

Make up WHAT?

Trump promised to his MAGAs to release Epstein files during the election, he then proceeded to fight their actual release tooth and nail.

If that doesn't look like conspicuous behavior to you then you are just ******* stupid, no two ways about it.

Obama promised if you like your doctor, if you like your insurance....you can keep your doctor....you can keep your insurance.
52 million people lost their coverage thanks to Obamacare.

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 1185890

So Biden directed Piglosi and lil Chucky to ignore them. And when Republicans took over Congress and sent a subpoena demanding their release is when they were actually released.

I already kicked your ass on this once, Simp.

Please try to keep up with your ass kickings.