What does your quote from the Psalms have anything to do with this discussion?
The fact is that frankie, who purports to be a Christian, attacked a fellow Christian for being gay. This type of conduct is precisely why I reject the notion that a person can be "a man [or woman] of God." If the Supreme Being has ever designated anyone throughout history as a spokesperson, I am sure that He or She (the notion of the Supreme Being having a biological sex being way beyond silly) has ample power to clearly point this person out.
frankie just has a big mouth.
The fact is that REVEREND GRAHAM corrected a presumed fellow Christian for misstating a tenet of Christianity. That is Biblically correct for him to do, both as a Christian and as a minister. That you hysterically want to label any and all diasgreement as "attacking" is not his problem. This type of conduct is a thinly-veiled excuse for rejecting any and all moral standards on your part. No matter what method the Supreme Being used to designate a teacher of the Bible, you would reject it, because you don't want to be expected to actually control or change your behavior.
You just have a big mouth, with no brain behind it.
The term "reverend" denotes someone who might qualify as being worthy of respect. frankie is just a dirty con-artist. Being anti-LGBT is absolutely NOT a tenet of Christianity. You don't own the Christian faith, so get off your high horse. Bet you voted for the immoral trump and the sex-creep veep.
The bible is neither inerrant nor infallible, you know, and was not written by the Supreme Being.
Your baby frankie chose to attack another Christian. frankie wants to add fuel to the fire in the never-ending battle between the sectarian factions of Christianity. Your frankie may worship his way. So may Mayor Pete.
Okay, little vocabulary for the terminally-illiterate embarrassment to all things allegedly female:
First, "denotes" refers to the actual definition of a word. As with all leftists on all things, YOU are gabbling about the connotation, your own personal "feewings" about the word. And as with everything you mistakenly consider to be your "thoughts", no one else gives a fuck.
Second, the denotation of the word "Reverend" is actually "title used by members of the clergy". Whatever your personal feelings or opinions about REVEREND Graham (and remember from just a second ago, no one on Earth considers your feelings or opinions to be worth shit), he's an ordained minister, which makes him a Reverend, and which makes the likes of trash like YOU unable to revoke that simply because you don't approve of him.
Third, your respect is exactly like your feelings and opinions: no one cares.
Fourth, I don't have to "own Christianity", Lice. Christianity derives from the Bible, and the Bible does view homosexual behavior as a sin, and there are no number of times that ignorant, evil false prophets like you - who DEFINITELY don't own Christianity - are going to try to declare otherwise that's going to make it true, or make YOU the authority and arbiter of anything to anyone.
Fifth, your opinions on the Bible's infallibility are every bit as valuable as your opinions on whether or not someone is a Reverend based on your approval.
Your baby self chose to attack REVEREND GRAHAM over a disagreement that your own words tell us are none of your frigging business. You're not a Christian. Disagreements between professed Christians therefore do not concern you, and most assuredly do not need your laughable help and your pathetic excuse for guidance.