How would anyone consider the likes of frankie graham to be a "man of God"??? He represents nothing but his own faction.
I've been criticized on USMB every time I've written that people who call themselves by the generic name of "Christian" need to identify themselves by denomination/group, but this imbroglio illustrates exactly why I have done so. Since the infancy of the Christian faith, it has split into factions over and over again. Even the more recent history of the colonies before the revolution against British rule shows this sectarian squabbling among the colonies.
As lately as yesterday, before this quote from franklin was published, I was asked by the courtesy driver from one of the stores that I shop at what religion I was, which I considered rude but let go. I had difficulty explaining to him, particularly given that his first language was not English, that I am a Christian but Christians are split off into different groups.
graham is saying that he has a right to be a Christian, but Buttigieg does not. I have to back Buttigieg on this one. graham is being a high holy jerk.
Graham is saying nothing of the sort. You are reading that into his words, because that's what you want to hear to rationalize your worldview. And because you're far from being the brightest or most literate . . . person, for want of a better word, on this board.
Buttigieg has as much right as anyone to be a Christian. What he does NOT have a right to do is to redefine Christianity to suit what he wants to do.
Buttigieg is not trying to "redefine Christianity." graham is, and he is totally out of bounds. As I said, Christians are continuing to subdivide. What shall we call you, the "Grahamite" faction?
Oh? So when he stands up and says that God wants him to be gay and that the core of Christianity is in tolerating and approving anything other people want to do - oh, and THEN immediately reversing himself by judging and condemning other people's actions - all in direct contradiction to what the Bible actually says, that isn't redefining Christianity? Why, because YOU want him to be right?
And Graham is out of bounds? Again, are you speaking from your vast "knowledge and experience" about Christianity and the job of a minister? Or because you consider it "out of bounds" to disagree with you?
Caring about what false prophets and fools like you think of Christians would require me to think of you as a sentient being worthy of my respect. As always, please hold your breath waiting to matter.
I'm going to be seeing God tonight, I can tell you, bleev me!
Is this why straight men shout "Oh, God!" "Oh, God!" at certain intimate moments of their lives, even if the neighbors can hear? In some Christian groups, this has been known as an "ejaculation."
I'm sorry, was this supposed to mean something other than, "No, I AM the supreme moral arbiter of the universe! I am, I am, I AM!!!"?
In case you were wondering, I was already aware a long time ago that you consider Donald Trump's sex life to be the worst - and, indeed, the only - sin ever committed in the history of humanity . . . aside from having been elected when you wanted Hillary.
And no matter how many times you triumphantly screech, "Donald Trump had sex! HE HAD SEX, OMIGOD, THE WORLD IS COLLAPSING!!!! HE SHOULD BE DRAWN AND QUARTERED FOR THE ULTIMATE SIN OF HAVING EXISTED AND HAVING HAD SEX!!!" I still don't care.