Quite obviously, he's implying christians live more wholesome lives than everyone else solely because of their religion. He's implying you're more likely to be a criminal if you aren't a christian, you're less likely to be prosperous and the community is less likely to have nice stuff in it.
There was already a thread made about less religious countries and how happy the people in the countries are, what could be more important than people being happy?
Logical4u is a loud, proud and outspoken bigot and has shown it in multiple posts on this thread. If I said a christian community was going to have a higher crime rate because it was christian (which i'd never stoop to), you'd call me a bigot and appropriately so.
Considering he realizes that no one is perfect, I doubt he is implying that at all. I would say that if A Christian lived his faith, He would be living a more wholesome life than a Christian who didn't or a non-Christian who rejected those same principles. But if you dont live the principles, whether Christian or not, how can they possibly benefit your life? What's the point?
You don't have to be Christian to live the principles of the Gospel and thus benefit from the wholesome nature of them. You can be honest without being Christian. You can seek to better yourself. You can love your neighbor as yourself.
But living the principles or not, we are still all flawed human beings.
If you compare someone who lives the Gospel to someone who believes in say, regular human sacrifice, wouldn't one belief make, if lived, make them more wholesome then the other? I am not sure how you can ignore the fact that holding certain believes can make a person better than someone who doesnt hold those beliefs. If you believe in educating yourself whenever possible and learning and studying and someone things learning is stupid and a waste of time, isn't there a clear contrast between the two? Isnt one better in some regards than the other?