A Fairly Comprehensive List of the 2020 Presidential Election Irregularities

DGS49

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2012
17,481
16,425
2,415
Pittsburgh

Some are a tiny bit lame, and unfortunately the list is not sorted according to significance or possible impact, but the list is sufficient to prove that claims of a "fair," "secure," or "perfect" are utterly false.

And for the record, news sources that refer to President Trump's "false" claims of election are simply lying. The claims are not yet proven in any meaningful forum. And that's about it. They are not false.
 

Some are a tiny bit lame, and unfortunately the list is not sorted according to significance or possible impact, but the list is sufficient to prove that claims of a "fair," "secure," or "perfect" are utterly false.

And for the record, news sources that refer to President Trump's "false" claims of election are simply lying. The claims are not yet proven in any meaningful forum. And that's about it. They are not false.
So, does this mean your orange douche bag is coming back to power?

Will we see JFK jr coming down to anoint the orange one? Where can I get tickets?
 

Some are a tiny bit lame, and unfortunately the list is not sorted according to significance or possible impact, but the list is sufficient to prove that claims of a "fair," "secure," or "perfect" are utterly false.

And for the record, news sources that refer to President Trump's "false" claims of election are simply lying. The claims are not yet proven in any meaningful forum. And that's about it. They are not false.

Sort of fun to open your list and find the first item is complete bullshit.
 

Some are a tiny bit lame, and unfortunately the list is not sorted according to significance or possible impact, but the list is sufficient to prove that claims of a "fair," "secure," or "perfect" are utterly false.

And for the record, news sources that refer to President Trump's "false" claims of election are simply lying. The claims are not yet proven in any meaningful forum. And that's about it. They are not false.
No sane person believes Biden won fairly.

81,LOL,LOL
 

Some are a tiny bit lame, and unfortunately the list is not sorted according to significance or possible impact, but the list is sufficient to prove that claims of a "fair," "secure," or "perfect" are utterly false.

And for the record, news sources that refer to President Trump's "false" claims of election are simply lying. The claims are not yet proven in any meaningful forum. And that's about it. They are not false.

There seem to be irregularities that aren't people trying to cheat, just that someone turns around and says "you shouldn't have done that, now it's against the constitution because I just said it is"
 
The Wisc SC ruling has no impact on the 2020 election, just those going forward.
I don't see anyone claiming it would change 2020.

You dismissed Solomon's list because the first item was "bullshit".

It's not bullshit- nothing on that list is bullshit.

81M votes for Biden? Yeah, that's bullshit...
 

Some are a tiny bit lame, and unfortunately the list is not sorted according to significance or possible impact, but the list is sufficient to prove that claims of a "fair," "secure," or "perfect" are utterly false.

And for the record, news sources that refer to President Trump's "false" claims of election are simply lying. The claims are not yet proven in any meaningful forum. And that's about it. They are not false.
The election was not stolen, no matter how you try to claim such, without evidence of fraud.

The Wisconsin court DID NOT INVALIDATE the ballot box votes for 2020, as your article FALSELY claims. So, STOP right there with that article lie.


Trump and the devil's minion, claimed the election was stolen from him. Nothing was stolen.

Litigated cases came before the courts on irregularities as you call them, and the States proceeded with the election based on the last court ruling right prior to voting.... Both democrat and republican voters, voted in the manner that was told to them, that they could vote.... They didn't steal the election from Trump. They simply voted and casted their votes, under the rules given to them.

If ballot boxes were not allowed, then voters would have found another means within the rules given, to vote....like mailing their ballots.

Court appeals and decisions in higher courts that came after the election, have no affect on the 2020 election results.

Yes, they will help in future elections, and decisions made for them.
 

Some are a tiny bit lame, and unfortunately the list is not sorted according to significance or possible impact, but the list is sufficient to prove that claims of a "fair," "secure," or "perfect" are utterly false.

And for the record, news sources that refer to President Trump's "false" claims of election are simply lying. The claims are not yet proven in any meaningful forum. And that's about it. They are not false.
Yes, every Loser in every presidential election in U.S. history could have claimed that he won in a "Landslide!" if he could not handle the truth. Nearly all had followed Trump's challenge to be gracious:

Screen Shot 2021-10-19 at 5.24.30 PM.png

"One must be able to lose with dignity.
So true!"
December 23, 2016

The reality is that fifty states, both those under Republican as well as Democratic administrations, certified their election results - after numerous recounts, audits, and court challenges.

The candidate favored in most if not all independent polls preceding the election won by over 7 million popular votes.

Among many others in the Trump regime, Trump's own Attorney General and his Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency confirmed the authenticity of the election.

Following the Loser's desperate attempts to thwart democracy, his goon attack to prevent the election's results being formally recognized by Congress, his tyrannical scheme to seize ballot boxes from states he lost, his gambit to substitute fake electors, etc. - all failed, the airy-fairy nonsense being spewed by the Trump propaganda machine continues but, after twenty months, they have still not been able to contrive the credible evidence necessary to bring their delusion before any judicial or legislative body anywhere in the nation.


Screen Shot 2022-07-26 at 9.11.59 AM.png

"We’ve got lots of
theories;

We just don’t have the evidence!"

They have been utterly impotent in naming even a single suspect in the vast caper that would have required the participation of thousands, not to mention all those bogus ballots dropped by Italian satellites or whatever goofball confections they came up with.

McConnell's final remark to Trump was,
Screen Shot 2022-07-26 at 9.02.38 AM.png

"You lost the election!"
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top