The mountain of evidence gets a little higher.

[berg80]

Your post confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt you will go to your grave believing the Big Lie.

 

[Faun]

Wait, you said it wasn't true. You said......."that is a left wing lie, there is no evidence that that actually happened. your credibility on this board is zero."

Your credibility went poof.

In all fairness, Redfish's credibility went poof years ago when he bet he would leave the forum forever if Biden won, but then didn't leave...

I'll off you that same bet I have with Dr Love, Biden wins I leave the board forever, Trump wins you leave the board forever. Just how confident are you? put up or shut up.

​

 

[berg80]

In all fairness, Redfish's credibility went poof years ago when he bet he would leave the forum forever if Biden won, but then didn't leave...

​

It comes as no surprise that his word is meaningless. He takes after his Dear Leader.

 

[billyerock123]

Right....

But there are nerds who examine the voting rolls....audits. to keep people from voting twice in two counties, counted twice, or dead people voting.
This video shows that this is precisely what happened. (Last of 3 of 5 minute videoes)

The point you are missing is the ballot will not run through twice …due to its SKU number … there will always dead people listed as voting … so far ever dead person that has been caught was all alledge to have voted was done by a Republican voter not a democrat … that has been exposed by the press … as for double voting that’s can’t happen …?as for fake ballots being accepted, it can’t happen .. all numbers of the ballots sent out are part of the counters software … meaning the SKU numbers are the only ballots that the machine will counot .., you are reading information from bull shit artist and you are buying into it … I can’t make you understand how the machine work's… I can only try and explain it to you… if you choose to believe these
Conspiracy theorist like Elon Musk, I can’t stop you … I can only tell you how the machine is supposed to work … in my state and it has been written in the press that 99% of the ballot cast are mail in ballots … we have never had any kind of issue of double ballots votes being cast or multiple votes cast … the voting machines will only accept the ballots that are numbered that’s had been sent out … it will only accept it once… so your so-call evidence you have all allege is not happening …so far this has been proven false … that’s why you don’t see any huge discovery of votes being cast twice … so you decidie it’s a conspiracy …the democrats blocking these issue …… byou forget in these voting places there are republicans there watching every vote being run through these machine … if there was a problem they would have shown the problem to the election officials … no so far that hasn’t happen … what has happen is these so-called voter watchers standing outside looking through windows and any thing they see done they go crazy with all these alledge voting irregularity… again that has been explain to the voters… they refuse to accept the explanation … that’s there problem not the election officials problem … your evidence has been look at many times and has been dismissed by Republican and democrat voting officials there is no there, there …

 

[JohnDB]

The point you are missing is the ballot will not run through twice …due to its SKU number

Unless there is human intervention....and they have the evidence of human intervention. That's what you are not understanding from their evidence....and they have the specific names of people who did it due to their ID numbers required to do it.

Read the ENTIRE article and evidence from the nerds...
I was like you doubting that it was fudged until I saw their evidence.
That's why the election board is calling to re-open the investigation.

This is not a mountain made out of a sneeze during counting...this is deliberate misconduct and a cover up.

 

[billyerock123]

Your post confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt you will go to your grave believing the Big Lie.

He gets his information from Elon musk website… here’s what a piece of shit Elon musk is … his website X helps you register to vote by you filing for a registrations to vote… he then dumps all the democrat registration and files all the Republican registration … so if you register on his site X and you are a democrat you need to reregister to vote at your local registration site … because you are not registered… a law suit has been filed against him for doing this … as a matter fact google just got sue for allowing disinformation for being posted they lost a lot of money and X has just been filed against fir doing the samething Google has been doing…

 

[billyerock123]

Unless there is human intervention....and they have the evidence of human intervention. That's what you are not understanding from their evidence....and they have the specific names of people who did it due to their ID numbers required to do it.

there is nothing a human can do to a voting machine that counts the vote there is no evidence from any state of people messing with a voting machine that's what you don't understand it is a federal law that if you get a sentence of 10 years if you try and alter a voting machine ... these machines are guarded day and night nobody can touch one unless they are authorized

since Election Day, PolitiFact has fact-checked more than 80 misleading or false claims about voter fraud in the 2020 election. Federal agencies, state election officials and technology experts have all said this year’s election was among the most secure in American history.

• A Georgia election worker was falsely accused of discarding ballots in a viral video of him working. He had to go into hiding.
• Pennsylvania poll workers weren’t caught fraudulently filling out ballots. The poll workers were copying information from damaged ballots onto blank ballots so they could be counted.
• It wasn’t "cheating" when California election workers collected ballots after the state called for Biden. A county official said the boxes were locked at 8 p.m. on election night.
• There’s no evidence ballots were smuggled into a Detroit counting hub. The video actually shows a local TV news photographer rolling in his equipment.
• A video of "ballot stuffing" is not from a Flint, Mich., polling place. It’s from Russia.
• Eric Trump retweeted a video falsely claiming that a man burned 80 Trump ballots. An investigation in Virginia Beach showed they were sample ballots.
• Donald Trump Jr. shared a video of an apparent election worker destroying Trump ballots. It was created as a prank.

Read the ENTIRE article and evidence from the nerds...
I was like you doubting that it was fudged until I saw their evidence.
That's why the election board is calling to re-open the investigation.

I've read you stuff ... it's from Elon Musk ... he is now under investigation for posting articles that are total lies your sources are one of them ... That is what you don't get or refuse to understand ... they had a computer Tecks checking all machines for tampering... nobody can access these computers there is noline so they have to be checked on site to any outside source ..

This is not a mountain made out of a sneeze during counting...this is deliberate misconduct and a cover up.

that is a left wing lie, there is no evidence that that actually happened. your credibility on this board is zero.

I

that is a left wing lie, there is no evidence that that actually happened. your credibility on this board is zero.

guess stinkfish can't read well
President Donald Trump has paid $2 million in a court-ordered judgment for misusing his charity, New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement Tuesday.

"Not only has the Trump Foundation shut down for its misconduct, but the president has been forced to pay $2 million for misusing charitable funds for his own political gain," James said. "Charities are not a means to an end, which is why these damages speak to the president's abuse of power and represent a victory for not-for-profits that follow the law."


Last month, a federal judge ordered Trump to pay the $2 million in damages after the foundation admitted in a settlement that the president personally misused foundation funds to help his 2016 presidential campaign, settle personal legal disputes and buyportraits of himself and sports memorabilia.

Trump ordered to pay $2M after misusing his charity in 'shocking pattern of illegality'
03:16
The $2 million will go to eight different charities: Army Emergency Relief, the Children's Aid Society, Citymeals-on-Wheels, Give an Hour, Martha’s Table, the United Negro College Fund, the United Way of National Capital Area, and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. Trump also agreed to distribute the remaining $1.8 million in the foundation's coffers among those same charities.
Each charity will receive a total of $476,140.41. The settlement also called for mandatory training requirements for the now-defunct foundation's directors — Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump, which James said each has undergone.
"Funds have finally gone where they deserve — to eight credible charities. My office will continue to fight for accountability because no one is above the law — not a businessman, not a candidate for office, and not even the president of the United States," James said.

Alan Futerfas, an attorney for The Trump Organization, said that the company is satisfied with the outcome.

Recommended​

2024 ElectionWisconsin voters weigh in on Harris, Trump and how they'll decide a key swing state​

Kamala HarrisHarris softens Biden's dark warnings about the state of democracy for a more 'joyful' message​

"The Foundation case settled weeks ago with all issues resolved and all funds going to charity. We are very pleased with the result," he said in an email to NBC News.
The Trump Foundation, the charitable organization started by Trump in 1987, agreed to disband in 2018 and give away its assets after a probe by then-acting New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood revealed a "shocking pattern of illegality" that included "unlawful coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing, and much more."
James took over the case in 2019 when she was sworn in as attorney general and continued the lawsuit against Trump and three of his eldest children, who served on the charity, and barred them from serving on any charities in New York state.

Dartunorro Clark
Dartunorro Clark covered national politics, including the Covid-19 recovery, for NBC News.

seems you miss a liberal lie stinkfish

 

[berg80]

in my state and it has been written in the press that 99% of the ballot cast are mail in ballots

CO? I worked for Jeffco in the 2008 and 2012 elections picking up ballots and bringing them to the county election office in Golden. I learned quite a bit about the protocols to ensure the integrity of the vote. Everyone took what they were doing very seriously and were proud to be playing a small role in the machinations of our democracy.

 

[billyerock123]

CO? I worked for Jeffco in the 2008 and 2012 elections picking up ballots and bringing them to the county election office in Golden. I learned quite a bit about the protocols to ensure the integrity of the vote. Everyone took what they were doing very seriously and were proud to be playing a small role in the machinations of our democracy.

yes, I live in colorado ... hey stinkfish heres what happens if you mess with voting machines

Mesa county’s Republican clerk and recorder, Tina Peters, who is currently being investigated by a grand jury for election tampering and misconduct, was arrested on unrelated charges Tuesday in Grand Junction. She tried to get the charges dismissed this week, but she lost shes going to trial i guess we won't see her for tthe next ten years or more ...

 

[Redfish]

Wait, you said it wasn't true. You said......."that is a left wing lie, there is no evidence that that actually happened. your credibility on this board is zero."

Your credibility went poof.

do you understand what the word "if" means?

your cred remains at zero, as does your reading comprehension.

 

[Redfish]

bottom line: senile joe did not win the 2020 election, he was installed as a puppet of the deep state and the corrupt media.

 

[berg80]

do you understand what the word "if" means?

your cred remains at zero, as does your reading comprehension.

Here's what you wrote about trump having to shut down his foundation in post #453.

"that is a left wing lie, there is no evidence that that actually happened."

All you had to say was you were wrong and I was right. But along with having no credibility you have no integrity.

 

[billyerock123]

do you understand what the word "if" means?

your cred remains at zero, as does your reading comprehension.

reading comprehension you have a lot of nerve telling someone has a reading comprehension when you can't grasp the word law being used in a sentence...

 

[Delldude]

In all fairness, @Redfish's credibility went poof years ago when he bet he would leave the forum forever if Biden won, but then didn't leave...

That's funny right there. I'll put it in the same file that all the dems were leaving the country when Trump won in 2016.

Your post confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt you will go to your grave believing the Big Lie.

Meh.............dems had the opportunity to say there was no fraud, STFU and move on, but they didn't.

Guilty consciences?

 

[billyerock123]

if that is correct, he paid it. Has Hillary paid for stealing classified documents? has she paid for selling our uranium to Russia? has she paid for the fake russian dossier? has she paid for lying about who Chelsea's biological father is? Has Algore paid for lying to the world in his fraudulent book? Has Sharpton paid his back taxes in the millions? Trump paid his dues and fines, the dems, not so much.

Hillary has never stolen any classified documents... the document, in question by Comey 13 was not marked classified ... in the document type, it had a @ sign... which meant they might be classified or confidential ... they were documents stating lunchtimes with her and heads of state where they were eating and what time ...they were supposed to be stamped as confidential... they weren't marked ... finally we aren't talking about Cheisea's parentage or al gore book or al sharps financial records...so stop the what about shit, shiny objects, as we call it... we are speaking about Trump and his alleged lies ...can ya stay on topic ???

 

[berg80]

Hillary has never stolen any classified documents... the document, in question by Comey 13 was not marked classified ... in the document type, it had a @ sign... which meant they might be classified or confidential ... they were documents stating lunchtimes with her and heads of state where they were eating and what time ...they were supposed to be stamped as confidential... they weren't marked ... finally we aren't talking about Cheisea's parentage or al gore book or al sharps financial records...so stop the what about shit, shiny objects, as we call it... we are speaking about Trump and his alleged lies ...can ya stay on topic ???

One aspect of the entire episode with Hillary's server rarely discussed is the inconsistent, haphazard way docs are classified.

 

[billyerock123]

if that is correct, he paid it. Has Hillary paid for stealing classified documents? has she paid for selling our uranium to Russia? has she paid for the fake russian dossier? has she paid for lying about who Chelsea's biological father is? Has Algore paid for lying to the world in his fraudulent book? Has Sharpton paid his back taxes in the millions? Trump paid his dues and fines, the dems, not so much.

one other thing it is correct and it was a fine for taking money from charity ... Hillary was never charged with anything ...
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton's to Veto or Approve Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can.


All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton "never intervened" in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn't personally involved.


There Is No Evidence That Uranium Went to Russia


That a change of company ownership occurred doesn't mean that 10 to 20 percent of America's uranium literally went to Russia. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ (Rosatom's mining subsidiary) is licensed to export uranium from the U.S. to other countries.


Some exports did occur, however.


A 2015 letter from NRC official Mark Satorius to a member of Congress revealed that an unspecified amount of yellowcake (semi-processed) uranium was shipped from a Uranium One facility in Wyoming to Canada between 2012 and 2014 for conversion (additional processing to prepare it for enrichment). A portion of that uranium was subsequently shipped to enrichment plants in Europe.


The transfers to Canada were legal despite Uranium One's not holding an export license because the NRC granted such a license to the company that transported it. The transfers to Europe were legal because they were approved by another agency, the U.S. Dept. of Energy. Satorius stressed that the transfers were subject to NRC oversight and all applicable safety and national security regulations:

Before issuing this license amendment to RSB Logistics Services — or any other export license or license amendment — the NRC must determine that the proposed export is not inimical to the common defense and security of the United States. Under existing NRC regulations, this means that any uranium proposed to be exported to any country for use in nuclear fuel would be subject to the Atomic Energy Act Section 123 agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation between the U.S. and that other country and confirmed in case-specific, government-to government assurances for each export license. The receiving country is required to commit to use the material only for peaceful purposes (not for development of any nuclear explosive device), to maintain adequate physical protection, and not to retransfer the material to a third country or alter it in form or content without the prior consent of the U.S. The transfer of the U.S.-supplied uranium from Canada to Europe noted above also was subject to applicable Section 123 agreements.

Additionally, a small amount of that exported uranium was, in fact, sold to other countries. According to a 2 November 2017 article in The Hill, Uranium One officials acknowledged that approximately 25 percent of the yellowcake exported for conversion was subsequently sold via "book transfer" to customers in Western Europe and Asia (yellowcake being a fungible commodity, that doesn't necessarily translate to a physical transfer of the product, however).


To date, there is no evidence that any of this uranium made its way to Russia. An NRC spokesman cited by FactCheck.org in October 2017 reaffirmed Satorius's assurances that "the U.S. government has not authorized any country to re-transfer U.S. uranium to Russia." NRC officials also say they're unaware of any Uranium One exports from the U.S. to foreign countries since 2014.


The Timing of Most of the Clinton Foundation Donations Does Not Match Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion's share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company's Canadian founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.


Of the remaining individuals connected with Uranium One who donated to the Clinton Foundation, only one was found to have contributed during the same time frame that the deal was taking place, according to The New York Times — Ian Telfer (also a Canadian), the company's chairman:

His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra's charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. "Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years," he said.

In addition to the Clinton Foundation donations, the New York Times also cited a $500,000 speaking fee paid to former president Bill Clinton by a Russian investment bank in June 2010, before the Uranium One deal was approved:

The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton's highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders, including Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, to speak at its investor conferences.
Renaissance Capital analysts talked up Uranium One's stock, assigning it a "buy" rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was "the best play" in the uranium markets.

The timing of Telfer’s Clinton Foundation donations and Bill Clinton's Renaissance Capital speaking fee might be questionable if there was reason to believe that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in the approval of the deal with Russia, but all the evidence points to the contrary — that Clinton did not play a pivotal role, and, in fact, may not have played any role at all. Moreover, neither Clinton nor her department possessed sole power of approval over said transaction.


Foundation Admits to Disclosure Mistakes One fault investigations into the Clinton Foundation's practices did find was that not all of the donations were properly disclosed — specifically, those of Uranium One Chairman Ian Telfer between 2009 and 2012. The foundation admitted this shortcoming and pledged to correct it, but as the Guardian pointed out in its May 2015 discussion of Clinton Cash, the fact that it happened is reason enough to sound alarm bells:

It is also true that large donations to the foundation from the chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer, at around the time of the Russian purchase of the company and while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, were never disclosed to the public. The multimillion sums were channeled through a subsidiary of the Clinton Foundation, CGSCI, which did not reveal its individual donors.
Such awkward collisions between Bill’s fundraising activities and Hillary’s public service have raised concerns not just among those who might be dismissed as part of a vast right-wing conspiracy.

An enormous volume of interest and speculation surrounds the workings of the Clinton Foundation, which is to be expected. Given the enormous sums of money it controls and the fact that it is run by a former U.S. president who is married to a former U.S. secretary of state and presidential candidate, the foundation deserves all the scrutiny it gets, and more.


At the same time, for the sake of accuracy it's crucial to differentiate between partisan accusations and what we actually know about it — however little that may be.


Update


On 17 October 2017, The Hill reported obtaining evidence that Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official who oversaw the American operations of the Russian nuclear agency Rosatom, was being investigated for corruption by multiple U.S. agencies while the Uranium One deal was up for approval — information that apparently was not shared with U.S. officials involved in approving the transaction. The Hill also reported receiving documents and eyewitness testimony "indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow," although no specifics about who those Russian nuclear officials were or how the money was allegedly routed to the Clinton Foundation were given. In any case, none of these revelations prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participated in a quid pro quo agreement to accept payment for approval of the Uranium One deal.

those are the fact not your made-up Breitbart bullshit stories

Sources​

 

[Delldude]

there is nothing a human can do to a voting machine that counts the vote there is no evidence from any state of people messing with a voting machine that's what you don't understand it is a federal law that if you get a sentence of 10 years if you try and alter a voting machine ... these machines are guarded day and night nobody can touch one unless they are authorized

since Election Day, PolitiFact has fact-checked more than 80 misleading or false claims about voter fraud in the 2020 election. Federal agencies, state election officials and technology experts have all said this year’s election was among the most secure in American history.

Humans control access to the secure voting machines.

End of story.

 

[Redfish]

one other thing it is correct and it was a fine for taking money from charity ... Hillary was never charged with anything ...
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton's to Veto or Approve Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can.


All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton "never intervened" in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn't personally involved.


There Is No Evidence That Uranium Went to Russia


That a change of company ownership occurred doesn't mean that 10 to 20 percent of America's uranium literally went to Russia. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ (Rosatom's mining subsidiary) is licensed to export uranium from the U.S. to other countries.


Some exports did occur, however.


A 2015 letter from NRC official Mark Satorius to a member of Congress revealed that an unspecified amount of yellowcake (semi-processed) uranium was shipped from a Uranium One facility in Wyoming to Canada between 2012 and 2014 for conversion (additional processing to prepare it for enrichment). A portion of that uranium was subsequently shipped to enrichment plants in Europe.


The transfers to Canada were legal despite Uranium One's not holding an export license because the NRC granted such a license to the company that transported it. The transfers to Europe were legal because they were approved by another agency, the U.S. Dept. of Energy. Satorius stressed that the transfers were subject to NRC oversight and all applicable safety and national security regulations:




Additionally, a small amount of that exported uranium was, in fact, sold to other countries. According to a 2 November 2017 article in The Hill, Uranium One officials acknowledged that approximately 25 percent of the yellowcake exported for conversion was subsequently sold via "book transfer" to customers in Western Europe and Asia (yellowcake being a fungible commodity, that doesn't necessarily translate to a physical transfer of the product, however).


To date, there is no evidence that any of this uranium made its way to Russia. An NRC spokesman cited by FactCheck.org in October 2017 reaffirmed Satorius's assurances that "the U.S. government has not authorized any country to re-transfer U.S. uranium to Russia." NRC officials also say they're unaware of any Uranium One exports from the U.S. to foreign countries since 2014.


The Timing of Most of the Clinton Foundation Donations Does Not Match Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion's share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company's Canadian founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.


Of the remaining individuals connected with Uranium One who donated to the Clinton Foundation, only one was found to have contributed during the same time frame that the deal was taking place, according to The New York Times — Ian Telfer (also a Canadian), the company's chairman:




In addition to the Clinton Foundation donations, the New York Times also cited a $500,000 speaking fee paid to former president Bill Clinton by a Russian investment bank in June 2010, before the Uranium One deal was approved:




The timing of Telfer’s Clinton Foundation donations and Bill Clinton's Renaissance Capital speaking fee might be questionable if there was reason to believe that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in the approval of the deal with Russia, but all the evidence points to the contrary — that Clinton did not play a pivotal role, and, in fact, may not have played any role at all. Moreover, neither Clinton nor her department possessed sole power of approval over said transaction.


Foundation Admits to Disclosure Mistakes One fault investigations into the Clinton Foundation's practices did find was that not all of the donations were properly disclosed — specifically, those of Uranium One Chairman Ian Telfer between 2009 and 2012. The foundation admitted this shortcoming and pledged to correct it, but as the Guardian pointed out in its May 2015 discussion of Clinton Cash, the fact that it happened is reason enough to sound alarm bells:




An enormous volume of interest and speculation surrounds the workings of the Clinton Foundation, which is to be expected. Given the enormous sums of money it controls and the fact that it is run by a former U.S. president who is married to a former U.S. secretary of state and presidential candidate, the foundation deserves all the scrutiny it gets, and more.


At the same time, for the sake of accuracy it's crucial to differentiate between partisan accusations and what we actually know about it — however little that may be.


Update


On 17 October 2017, The Hill reported obtaining evidence that Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official who oversaw the American operations of the Russian nuclear agency Rosatom, was being investigated for corruption by multiple U.S. agencies while the Uranium One deal was up for approval — information that apparently was not shared with U.S. officials involved in approving the transaction. The Hill also reported receiving documents and eyewitness testimony "indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow," although no specifics about who those Russian nuclear officials were or how the money was allegedly routed to the Clinton Foundation were given. In any case, none of these revelations prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participated in a quid pro quo agreement to accept payment for approval of the Uranium One deal.

those are the fact not your made-up Breitbart bullshit stories

Sources​

it happened on her watch, so it's her responsibility, you can post all the propaganda lies you have but the truth is the truth, Hillary Clinton is a traitor who should be in prison.

 

[Delldude]

it happened on her watch, so it's her responsibility, you can post all the propaganda lies you have but the truth is the truth, Hillary Clinton is a traitor who should be in prison.

Thought he wanted to stay on topic?