A consideration of the Biden bid for another term

She's an ambitious idiot. She will implement the progressive agenda that will take America into the future. Young people want climate change addressed. Pronto. The GOP is not a viable party for young people because of it's position on climate change and inequality
You can't control the climate and there is no inequality in the USA. You must be very young.
 
That just means that they are not planning to do much with regard to the border until after the election, when it can't get Biden fired anymore. Kamala is working on abortion, working to make sure that women across the country knows what's at stake if a religious freak like DeSantis is eying the presidency
So you're a Christophobic bigot.
 
Do you think Biden is in cognitive decline?

Everyone past certain age is in cognitive decline.

Is Biden as sharp today as he was 10 years ago? No.

But he was sharp enough to win the presidency 3 years ago, sharp enough to competently lead the country through turbulent times, sharp enough to make good policy decisions and have mostly drama free presidency. (None of that can be said for Trump.)

In short, Joe keeps doing what you rightwingers swore up and down he could not do.

As far as Biden's 2024 campaign, again the proof will be in the pudding - if he can run the campaign, handle the grind and perform adequately at the debates, then he is still sharp enough to continue to be the POTUS.
 
Last edited:
She's an ambitious idiot. She will implement the progressive agenda that will take America into the future. Young people want climate change addressed. Pronto. The GOP is not a viable party for young people because of it's position on climate change and inequality
The GOP is abouts the truth. Something Democrats know nothing about.
 
The guy is clearly too old to start another term as President. Unfortunately, the only other choice is most likely going to be a socio-political cult, which will leave around 80 million from across the political spectrum with no choice but to vote for him again.

I've seen a lot interest from the Dems in Whitmer if he doesn't run, but what about Harris? That could get ugly pretty quick.

What a mess. Both parties.
 
The guy is clearly too old to start another term as President. Unfortunately, the only other choice is most likely going to be a socio-political cult, which will leave around 80 million from across the political spectrum with no choice but to vote for him again.

I've seen a lot interest from the Dems in Whitmer if he doesn't run, but what about Harris? That could get ugly pretty quick.

What a mess. Both parties.
Well shill, we have a primary process to hash things out. The ones you shill for are afraid to even have one debate.
 
That just means that they are not planning to do much with regard to the border until after the election, when it can't get Biden fired anymore. Kamala is working on abortion, working to make sure that women across the country knows what's at stake if a religious freak like DeSantis is eying the presidency
Arlette. If your views as a Progressive Socialist means people living much poorer, would you support it? If you live comfortably, would you live much more austere for your beliefs? There are many people who are haves, and just speak the game. Then go home to their comforts as they complantate their visions of plenty for all in a world that does not have plenty for more than a third of the population at most at this point. 3 billion are in poverty or so from my understanding. That is just to start. How about people like Leonardo living like the lowest showing us the way to empathy, sympathy and compassion.
 
Arlette. If your views as a Progressive Socialist means people living much poorer, would you support it? If you live comfortably, would you live much more austere for your beliefs? There are many people who are haves, and just speak the game. Then go home to their comforts as they complantate their visions of plenty for all in a world that does not have plenty for more than a third of the population at most at this point. 3 billion are in poverty or so from my understanding. That is just to start. How about people like Leonardo living like the lowest showing us the way to empathy, sympathy and compassion.
I'm not a socialist, so no. I wouldn't support socialism anyways.
I disagree that we don't have enough for everybody. We do. Some just have way more than they should have. By that I mean ill-gotten by manipulating our system. The problem in my opinion is the huge inequality in this country. We can tax billionaires and they still will be rich.

I don't know who that Leonardo you are talking about is.
 
I'm not a socialist, so no. I wouldn't support socialism anyways.
I disagree that we don't have enough for everybody. We do. Some just have way more than they should have. By that I mean ill-gotten by manipulating our system. The problem in my opinion is the huge inequality in this country. We can tax billionaires and they still will be rich.

I don't know who that Leonardo you are talking about is.
billionaires are not going to give us plenty for everybody. However, if Prog ones give 99 percent of their living expenses to others than that will be a start. Leonardo is the actor. No people that live wealthy lives who promote Prog ways give their wealth away. Notice it?
 
billionaires are not going to give us plenty for everybody. However, if Prog ones give 99 percent of their living expenses to others than that will be a start. Leonardo is the actor. No people that live wealthy lives who promote Prog ways give their wealth away. Notice it?
They all pay taxes
 
billionaires are not going to give us plenty for everybody. However, if Prog ones give 99 percent of their living expenses to others than that will be a start. Leonardo is the actor. No people that live wealthy lives who promote Prog ways give their wealth away. Notice it?
Yes. I noticed it. That's why they have to be compelled. By law. With a big tax hike
 
86ced5017a3b4ae215eeea1a14a61ce678389fec62fb5bdd6a09bd3611269d8a.jpg
 
I'm not a socialist, so no. I wouldn't support socialism anyways.
I disagree that we don't have enough for everybody. We do. Some just have way more than they should have. By that I mean ill-gotten by manipulating our system. The problem in my opinion is the huge inequality in this country. We can tax billionaires and they still will be rich.

I don't know who that Leonardo you are talking about is.
"way more than they should have"? Spoken like a true socialist. How much should they have?
 

Forum List

Back
Top