The numbers would be meaningless, considering how black people account for a far less percentage of the population. What is it, something like 12 or 13%?
When you take into consideration the disproportionate numbers of black on black killings compared to white on white killings, it takes on more perspective.
How can the numbers be meaningless?
I asked for white on white crime compared to black on black crime.
That should show us if blacks are truly more criminal, as you've been clearly dogwhistling all along.
I'd like to see those numbers please.
Let me explain it to you another way: There would be more white on white crime because there are 4.84 times as many white people in the US. In 2018, there were 2,925 black or African American murder victims committed by other black or African Americans.
There were 3,315 white murder victims committed by 2,677 white people.
Expanded Homicide Data Table 6
Now to look at those numbers, one would think that the white on white murder rate is higher. True, there was a higher number of white on white murders but remember: There are also 4.84 times as many white people in the US. That would mean to be proportionally equal, there would have had to have been 2,677 X 4.84, or 12956.68 white on white murders in order for the white community to be equal to the black.
I'm just surprised that you can't seem to fathom this, so let's try it again:
Imagine there are two tribes of Indians: The Fuckawe tribe consists of 100 Indians and one of them kills the other 99.
The Boogabooga Tribe consists of 500 Indians and one of them kills 99 others.
Which tribe has the worst murder rate problem?