Zone1 A Basic Minimum Income Supplement and the percentage of women who choose abortion?

A 500 dollar monthly B. M. I. would likely cause what percentage of women to reject abortion?

  • Zero to ten percent would choose life if B. M. I supplement was instituted

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • Eleven to twenty percent of women would likely choose life a B. M. I. was in place

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Twenty one percent to thirty percent of women would likely choose life if B. M. I. was instituted.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Thirty one percent to forty percent of women would likely choose life if B. M. I was in place.

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • More than forty one percent of women would likely choose life if a B. M. I. was in place.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Abortions must be stopped through legislation, not prevented by a B. M. I.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
You are absolutely correct that five hundred dollars is like nothing but this idea sets the stage for the question of whether or not the Pro-Life Community might just be willing to AGREE with and support the people who support an Unconditional but Taxable Basic Minimum Income Supplement?

The timing certainly is correct for there to be at least some level of agreement across partly lines both in Canada as well as in the USA, under our extreme set of circumstances.

If I understand your proposition correctly, you are saying that the pro-life people and the UBI people will agree to support each other's policies and both could get done. Well, I would never say never, but the pro-lifers are Far Right and the UBI folks are Far Left and so it's hard to see those guy agreeing to support each other. Do they trust each other? I doubt it. I can see the real possibility that whoever gets their policies First will renege on the other side's policies and so one of the two doesn't happen.

Digging a bit deeper, I do not see the Left supporting pro-life legislation without a lot of expensive concessions for child-care, education, housing, etc. If the Right accepts those concessions and on top of that supports UBI across the country then you are talking about an extremely large spending package and tax hikes. I can see the Left coming out of it as big winners if the Right agrees with all that.
 
If I understand your proposition correctly, you are saying that the pro-life people and the UBI people will agree to support each other's policies and both could get done. Well, I would never say never, but the pro-lifers are Far Right and the UBI folks are Far Left and so it's hard to see those guy agreeing to support each other. Do they trust each other? I doubt it. I can see the real possibility that whoever gets their policies First will renege on the other side's policies and so one of the two doesn't happen.

Digging a bit deeper, I do not see the Left supporting pro-life legislation without a lot of expensive concessions for child-care, education, housing, etc. If the Right accepts those concessions and on top of that supports UBI across the country then you are talking about an extremely large spending package and tax hikes. I can see the Left coming out of it as big winners if the Right agrees with all that.

You are absolutely correct. I voted for Conservative M. P. Dan Muys in our last Canadian federal election but I joined Canada's New Democratic Party in May of 2025 because I was thinking that I should at least attempt to campaign for the role of national leader of the NDP.

I soon found out that I joined two months too late but now being a member of the NDP allows me to pick a possible national leader and attempt to set them up as best as I can to do diplomacy across historical political boundaries?


 
You are absolutely correct. I voted for Conservative M. P. Dan Muys in our last Canadian federal election but I joined Canada's New Democratic Party in May of 2025 because I was thinking that I should at least attempt to campaign for the role of national leader of the NDP.

I soon found out that I joined two months too late but now being a member of the NDP allows me to pick a possible national leader and attempt to set them up as best as I can to do diplomacy across historical political boundaries?


Didn't realize you were Canadian. Back in the 90s, Canada was facing a debt and deficits problem and they found a way to come together and fix the problem by limiting spending a lot and raising taxes a little bit. Not sure if that could happen again in your country or mine, but I'd like to think so cuz I really don't follow politics north of our border. Huge credit to Canada for what they did then.
 
Didn't realize you were Canadian. Back in the 90s, Canada was facing a debt and deficits problem and they found a way to come together and fix the problem by limiting spending a lot and raising taxes a little bit. Not sure if that could happen again in your country or mine, but I'd like to think so cuz I really don't follow politics north of our border. Huge credit to Canada for what they did then.

In my opinion Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper was one of our best......
and P. M. Mark Carney seems to want to go down in history as one of our worst.... [much like P. M. Justin].

P. M. Mark Carney's policy toward Israel as of September of 2025, seems to be rewarding terrorism.



 
Back
Top Bottom