9th circus dissmisses case agaisnt sanctuarys in Steinle family lawsuit

[bodecea]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Sure sounds like he was conveying a threat, doesn't it?

we have "under God" in our pledge; why do our politicians bear so much false witness?

Don't have to say it....not a requirement.

 

[WillowTree]

Appeal the decision. Most of the 9th Circuit's decisions are over turned. Sanctuary policy is what got Kate Steinle murdered.
This particular illegal felon is just the instrument of San Francisco's illegal policies.

Is there immunity when sanctuary policies which are known to result in the murder of American citizens (like the Bologna family of San Francisco, for instance) are promoted by politicians there?

It will be referred to the Supreme Court!

Based on what, exactly?

Based on which law has statute, city vs federal dumbass!

 

[WillowTree]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

I have expressed my thoughts & prayers at her death.

Your dumbasses thoughts and prayers won’t bring her back so shelve them!

 

[Montrovant]

You knew as soon as the case got moved to the incredibly biased 9th circuit, there was little hope justice would be carried out.

How do you claim that the 9th is "incredibly biased"? And what was the court's determination for making the ruling they made?

Do go out of your way to prove what a blathering idiot you are? Or like most filthy trolls, do you just like to play games and spew BS?

I am asking what the ruling was based on....don't you think that would be a key point here? Or do you just like to foam at the mouth for no valid reason?

Well, since it doesn't say so in the link HOW IN BLOODY HELL WOULD I KNOW? I don't make up CRAP like you idiots do!

Wait, so you start a thread bemoaning the horrible ruling, basically saying that the 9th is a liberal court and " Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with," but you haven't even read the ruling or seen what legal basis it rests on?

 

[Wyatt earp]

What was the reasoning in their ruling?

You were crying about letting in Illegal Rapist killer Mexicans


.

 

[bodecea]

Appeal the decision. Most of the 9th Circuit's decisions are over turned. Sanctuary policy is what got Kate Steinle murdered.
This particular illegal felon is just the instrument of San Francisco's illegal policies.

Is there immunity when sanctuary policies which are known to result in the murder of American citizens (like the Bologna family of San Francisco, for instance) are promoted by politicians there?

It will be referred to the Supreme Court!

Based on what, exactly?

Based on which law has statute, city vs federal dumbass!

But that's not the basis for the family's lawsuit....and why it was struck down. Didn't you read the ruling?

Here:

A federal appeals court in California ruled that the parents of Kate Steinle, a woman fatally shot by an unauthorized immigrant in July 2015, cannot sue the city of San Francisco for failing to notify immigration officials of his release from a local jail weeks before the killing.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, ruled that San Francisco's then-sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, violated no federal, state or local laws when he released Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, also known as José Inez Garcia Zarate, on a minor marijuana charge without notifying Immigration and Custom Enforcement.

The ruling upholds a lower court in dismissing "a general negligence claim" against the city filed by Steinle's parents. Their suit alleged that Mirkarimi drew up a memorandum instructing city employees to limit the information shared with federal officials about the release of unauthorized immigrants from the San Francisco jail.

"Our holding today makes no judgment as to whether or not the policy established by the Memo was wise or prudent. That is not our job," the panel wrote.

The judges said city's policy did not violate federal law and that Mirkarimi had a right to enforce the memo.

 

[bodecea]

What was the reasoning in their ruling?

You were crying about letting in Illegal Rapist killer Mexicans


.

No I wasn't...but you misrepresenting what has been said is sure convincing...................to someone.

 

[WillowTree]

It will go to the Supreme Court! Mark it down!

 

[danielpalos]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

there is no immigration clause in our Constitution; your right wing bigotry is what got her killed.

 

[WillowTree]

And then educate yourself as to the number of times the Supreme Court has over ruled the ninth circuit!

 

[WillowTree]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

there is no immigration clause in our Constitution; your right wing bigotry is what got her killed.

Oh GFY.

 

[bodecea]

You knew as soon as the case got moved to the incredibly biased 9th circuit, there was little hope justice would be carried out.

How do you claim that the 9th is "incredibly biased"? And what was the court's determination for making the ruling they made?

Do go out of your way to prove what a blathering idiot you are? Or like most filthy trolls, do you just like to play games and spew BS?

I am asking what the ruling was based on....don't you think that would be a key point here? Or do you just like to foam at the mouth for no valid reason?

Well, since it doesn't say so in the link HOW IN BLOODY HELL WOULD I KNOW? I don't make up CRAP like you idiots do!

Wait, so you start a thread bemoaning the horrible ruling, basically saying that the 9th is a liberal court and " Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with," but you haven't even read the ruling or seen what legal basis it rests on?

And....he brags about being ignorant. That's a CRC for you....

 

[danielpalos]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

there is no immigration clause in our Constitution; your right wing bigotry is what got her killed.

Oh GFY.

only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, don't care about the law.

 

[bodecea]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

there is no immigration clause in our Constitution; your right wing bigotry is what got her killed.

Oh GFY.

Dear me....triggered.

 

[miketx]

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

there is no immigration clause in our Constitution; your right wing bigotry is what got her killed.

Oh GFY.

Dear me....triggered.

Perhaps if you assisted in aborting a baby you could overcome it?

 

[Montrovant]

Then....present it for us. Why is the 9th incredibly biased?

They are known to be a leftist court and their decisions are over turned upon appeal 80% of the time. Liberal Ninth Circuit Court Is Overturned in Recent Years 80% of Time

Every one knows. For you to make me demonstrate a universally accepted fact is a form of dishonesty and deceit.

That number was based on 19 reversals. The number of cases that go to the USSC is far, far fewer than the number of cases that go before the Ninth Circuit Court.

 

[bodecea]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

I have expressed my thoughts & prayers at her death.

Your dumbasses thoughts and prayers won’t bring her back so shelve them!

Wait......you are denigrating "thoughts & prayers"? How dare you, sir! How dare you!

 

[bodecea]

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

there is no immigration clause in our Constitution; your right wing bigotry is what got her killed.

Oh GFY.

Dear me....triggered.

Perhaps if you assisted in aborting a baby you could overcome it?

Never aborted a baby....you see (allow me to explain), I have a very reliable form of birth control.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The judges said city's policy did not violate federal law and that Mirkarimi had a right to enforce the memo.

It (sanctuary law) actually DOES violate federal law in that it is designed specifically to counteract federal immigration law and oppose it.

It is no more legal than when Jim Crow governors blocked black children from trying to enter segregated public schools and soldiers with fixed bayonets had to escort those children into the schools.

Surprise! The 9th Circuit court got something else wrong. And saying sanctuary policy isn't stopping federal agents from doing their jobs, it just isn't helping them is specious b.s.!

Sanctuary policy is meant to aid and assist people who violate federal law and therefore breaks the law itself.
The distinction between not helping ICE agents and actually hindering them from applying the law, by cutting off all
communications and assistance between sanctuary cities, like San Francisco, and immigration agents is
patently absurd on it's face and the end result is the same....federal law is thwarted by sanctuary policy.

If you aren't ready to discuss the issue don't bother with a reply.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

there is no immigration clause in our Constitution; your right wing bigotry is what got her killed.

San Francisco's illegal sanctuary policy is what killed Katie Steinle and she's not the first person in SF to die due to shielding illegal felons from the law. So fuck your idiocy and take your lame post and jam it!