I didn't make a claim. You did. You claimed no GCM's include spherical earth with rotation, did you not? Did I not prove this claim false by showing that at least one GCM does?
I made the claim. And I ask again, what is the point in modeling a spinning sphere if it is still going to be receiving weak twilight across its entire surface 24 hours a day with no day/night separation?
Already explained it silly man repeating it won't help you...
I heard from the best in the business who`s business it is to expose frauds that the easiest way to expose a fraudster is to let him talk.
The more they talk the deeper the hole they dig for themselves.
We`ve seen it with the "erudite" numan, the "Journalist from Finland", Saigon,..the "nuclear engineer & water chemistry expert" who makes "ink molecules" and now we got an "astrophysics computer model expert" who is trying to dazzle us with a copied and pasted subroutine which he got from an open source that anybody can access.
He would not know how to write a single bit of code else he would have realized that the section he copied had nothing to do with the claim he made.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/envir...tating-spherical-earth-wrong.html#post7264623
None of the links poophead the "programming expert" posted pointed to the web page where that code is published. The first link he posted was a zip file:C**** CALCULATE CORIOLIS PARAMETER 448.
OMEGA = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/(EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY) 449.
F(1) = -RADIUS*OMEGA*.5*COSP(2)*DXV(2) 450.
F(JM) = -F(1) 451.
DO 690 J=2,JM-1 452.
690 F(J) = OMEGA*(DXV(J)*DXV(J)-DXV(J+1)*DXV(J+1))/DLON 453.
CLAT_DG latitude of mid points of primary and sec. grid boxs (deg)
C**** latitudinal spacing depends on whether you have even spacing or
C**** a partial box at the pole
DLAT_DG=180./(JM-1) ! 1/2 box at pole for 4x5 and 7.8x10
C**** LATITUDES (degrees); used extensively in the diagn. print routines
LAT_DG(1,1)=-90.
LAT_DG(1,2)=-90.
LAT_DG(JM,1)=90.
DO J=2,JM-1
LAT_DG(J,1)=DLAT_DG*(J-FJEQ) ! primary (tracer) latitudes
END DO
http://edgcm.columbia.edu/ModelII/modelII_source.zip
All that is, is a few files in .f (fortran format) which is in turn a library segment that can be called up if you state it in C+ with the "include" function.
The code he copied and pasted was`nt even in any of the files in this .zip package.
So he kept clicking on every link of the http nasa.gov web page with the windows [cont]+[F] function till he stumbled upon a page where the windows find function highlighted his search word "spherical" in green.
And the page he stumbled upon was this one:
http://map.nasa.gov/ModelE_html/html_code/src/GEOM_B.f.html
As a bonus he seen the word "coriolis" in one or the non-execute Remark lines, then copied & pasted it without the slightest idea what that subroutine does...and does so only if the main program calls that routine.
This line:
OMEGA = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/(EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY)Is just a little subroutine that calls up the constants that are used in all of the other computer models that have been tried out and failed and has nothing to do with the huge flaw of the main programs that fail so miserably.
All it is, is a simple calculation of the preservation of angular momentum (a.ka. Coriolis effect) and "OMEGA" is the main model library constant for the earth`s angular momentum.
http://map.nasa.gov/ModelE_html/html_code/src/CONST.f.html#CONSTANT
When will these AGW "science expert" forum fraudsters learn that they can`t bullshit all of us all the time.!@param omega earth's rotation rate (7.29 s^-1) c real*8,parameter :: omega = 7.2921151467d-5 ! NOVAS value real*8,parameter :: EDPERD = 1. real*8,parameter :: EDPERY = 365. real*8,parameter :: omega = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/ * (EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY)
and what makes them think that we won`t start using over sized fonts like some of them do all the time
The rest of the "denialists" here @ the USMSB know that people who use words like "denialists", "devotés", "ink molecules" or spell physicist "physisist" are not physicists, neither do they write C+ code for astrophysics, run nuclear reactors, are "erudite numans" or "highly educated" Journalists in Finland.
Last edited: