911 another stake through the heart of the official story huggers!

Unless you are now claiming that the towers did not fall on September 11th, 2001, that is the day that we saw the footage. Those of us who watched the live feeds saw it early in the morning.

Did the towers fall that day? Do you think that there were planes added into pre-recorded footage of the towers falling, distributed to the various networks so they could air them and pretend it was live? How much time do you think that would take? How long were the towers burning before they fell? Would there have been enough time after the sun was fully up that day for the events to have happened, then someone adds to the various recordings of the events (which the networks all agreed not to show, obviously) and sends it out to pretend it is live footage?

Do you really expect us to believe you don't know the difference between a movie and a live broadcast, or that you don't think other people do?

What is this definition you claim Roudy is operating under by which all broadcasts are live?

:popcorn:

the dumb ass thinks everything was live, it was not. rarely does ANYTHING get shown live.

the first fuz blob they called a plane aired on tv was sept 12 and that was the naudet bros. he is either a fucking idiot or a liar.

I am not concerned with who did it, I am only concerned with what has been put in the public as factual when it is all fraudulent.

So no one saw a plane hit the towers on September 11? :confused:

:lmao:


The material evidence says that would have been impossible.
 
bullshit! when content is added everything else must be adjusted to match it.
also shit for brains the "moving smoke is not actually moving it's an illusion because whoever made that piece of shit dropped several frames when the planes were added.
bullshit! when content is added everything else must be adjusted to match it.
also shit for brains the "moving smoke is not actually moving it's an illusion because whoever made that piece of shit dropped several frames when the planes were added.
actually they do! you do know what a cable box is or an antenna is?
again you willful ignorance shines!



ah huh yes sure ok of course

what a fucking dead brain tard
that gif just proves how ignorant you truly are.
 
the dumb ass thinks everything was live, it was not. rarely does ANYTHING get shown live.

the first fuz blob they called a plane aired on tv was sept 12 and that was the naudet bros. he is either a fucking idiot or a liar.

I am not concerned with who did it, I am only concerned with what has been put in the public as factual when it is all fraudulent.

So no one saw a plane hit the towers on September 11? :confused:

:lmao:


The material evidence says that would have been impossible.
BULLSHIT:Material evidence
Definition
: evidence that is likely to affect the determination of a matter or issue
specif
: evidence that warrants reopening of a claim or reversal of a conviction because but for the circumstance that the evidence was unavailable the outcome of the first proceeding would have been different..
IT SAYS NOTHING OF THE KIND
 
the dumb ass thinks everything was live, it was not. rarely does ANYTHING get shown live.

the first fuz blob they called a plane aired on tv was sept 12 and that was the naudet bros. he is either a fucking idiot or a liar.

I am not concerned with who did it, I am only concerned with what has been put in the public as factual when it is all fraudulent.

So no one saw a plane hit the towers on September 11? :confused:

:lmao:


The material evidence says that would have been impossible.

You are avoiding the question.

You said the first blob aired on tv was Sept 12. That seems to be saying that no one watched planes hit the towers on Sept 11, whether it was doctored video or not. Are you trying to tell us that the video we thought we saw on the 11th we actually saw on the 12th?
 
So no one saw a plane hit the towers on September 11? :confused:

:lmao:


The material evidence says that would have been impossible.
BULLSHIT:Material evidence
Definition
: evidence that is likely to affect the determination of a matter or issue
specif
: evidence that warrants reopening of a claim or reversal of a conviction because but for the circumstance that the evidence was unavailable the outcome of the first proceeding would have been different..
IT SAYS NOTHING OF THE KIND


you really need to see a doctor about that.

 
So no one saw a plane hit the towers on September 11? :confused:

:lmao:


The material evidence says that would have been impossible.

You are avoiding the question.

You said the first blob aired on tv was Sept 12. That seems to be saying that no one watched planes hit the towers on Sept 11, whether it was doctored video or not. Are you trying to tell us that the video we thought we saw on the 11th we actually saw on the 12th?

post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that.
 
The material evidence says that would have been impossible.
BULLSHIT:Material evidence
Definition
: evidence that is likely to affect the determination of a matter or issue
specif
: evidence that warrants reopening of a claim or reversal of a conviction because but for the circumstance that the evidence was unavailable the outcome of the first proceeding would have been different..
IT SAYS NOTHING OF THE KIND


you really need to see a doctor about that.

another dodge.once again proving you have no clue...
 
The material evidence says that would have been impossible.

You are avoiding the question.

You said the first blob aired on tv was Sept 12. That seems to be saying that no one watched planes hit the towers on Sept 11, whether it was doctored video or not. Are you trying to tell us that the video we thought we saw on the 11th we actually saw on the 12th?

post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that.
[ame=http://youtu.be/uT9jkBGFlr0]Cnn 09 11 2001 Live Unedited Cnn News Coverage Of Wtc Attacks From 8 50Am To 11 30Am 911 Cnn Footage - YouTube[/ame]
btw shit for brains the dates stated by the newscasters proves the date.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are avoiding the question.

You said the first blob aired on tv was Sept 12. That seems to be saying that no one watched planes hit the towers on Sept 11, whether it was doctored video or not. Are you trying to tell us that the video we thought we saw on the 11th we actually saw on the 12th?

post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that.
[ame="http://youtu.be/uT9jkBGFlr0"]Cnn 09 11 2001 Live Unedited Cnn News Coverage Of Wtc Attacks From 8 50Am To 11 30Am 911 Cnn Footage - YouTube[/ame]
btw shit for brains the dates stated by the newscasters proves the date.

[ame=http://youtu.be/vt29IKoNItA]9/11: FDNY World Trade Center Tapes - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://youtu.be/WEyA3bZRyt8]9/11/01 INSIDE THE WTC (RAW AND UNEDITED!!) - YouTube[/ame]


stop trying to waste my time.

Nothing to see here folks.

None of those clips show a plane impacting wtc2.
 
You are avoiding the question.

You said the first blob aired on tv was Sept 12. That seems to be saying that no one watched planes hit the towers on Sept 11, whether it was doctored video or not. Are you trying to tell us that the video we thought we saw on the 11th we actually saw on the 12th?

post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that.
[ame="http://youtu.be/uT9jkBGFlr0"]Cnn 09 11 2001 Live Unedited Cnn News Coverage Of Wtc Attacks From 8 50Am To 11 30Am 911 Cnn Footage - YouTube[/ame]
btw shit for brains the dates stated by the newscasters proves the date.

[ame="http://youtu.be/vt29IKoNItA"]9/11: FDNY World Trade Center Tapes - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://youtu.be/WEyA3bZRyt8"]9/11/01 INSIDE THE WTC (RAW AND UNEDITED!!) - YouTube[/ame]


stop trying to waste my time.

Nothing to see here folks.

None of those clips show a plane impacting wtc2.

Wtc1 naudet clip was aired the day after.

and that is not the raw unedited naudet for shit sake stop posting this trash.

fucking loser still trying to pound square pegs in round holes I see.

 
Last edited:
post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that.
[ame="http://youtu.be/uT9jkBGFlr0"]Cnn 09 11 2001 Live Unedited Cnn News Coverage Of Wtc Attacks From 8 50Am To 11 30Am 911 Cnn Footage - YouTube[/ame]
btw shit for brains the dates stated by the newscasters proves the date.

[ame=http://youtu.be/vt29IKoNItA]9/11: FDNY World Trade Center Tapes - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://youtu.be/WEyA3bZRyt8]9/11/01 INSIDE THE WTC (RAW AND UNEDITED!!) - YouTube[/ame]


stop trying to waste my time.

Nothing to see here folks.

None of those clips show a plane impacting wtc2.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...he-official-story-huggers-27.html#post8225204
 
post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that.
[ame="http://youtu.be/uT9jkBGFlr0"]Cnn 09 11 2001 Live Unedited Cnn News Coverage Of Wtc Attacks From 8 50Am To 11 30Am 911 Cnn Footage - YouTube[/ame]
btw shit for brains the dates stated by the newscasters proves the date.

[ame=http://youtu.be/vt29IKoNItA]9/11: FDNY World Trade Center Tapes - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://youtu.be/WEyA3bZRyt8]9/11/01 INSIDE THE WTC (RAW AND UNEDITED!!) - YouTube[/ame]


stop trying to waste my time.

Nothing to see here folks.

None of those clips show a plane impacting wtc2.

Wtc1 naudet clip was aired the day after.

fucking loser still trying to pound square pegs in round holes I see.


TRYING TO SKIP OUT ? IS THIS YOUR QUOTE OR NOT?"post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that."KOKO7
NOWHERE IN THAT STATEMENT DO YOU ASK FOR OR IMPLY A CRASH CLIP. YOU WERE ASKING TO PROVE THE DATE i DID THAT.
ALSO THE NAUDET VIDEO WAS BROADCAST LIVE NOT LONG AFTER IT WAS SHOT ON 911. THE BROTHERS RUSHED TO THE CNN NEW YORK HEADQUARTERS WITHIN MINUTES OF THE COLLAPSE.
YOU MAY HAVE SEEN IT THE NEXT DAY ..
IN THE FIRST 24 HOURS AFTER THE ATTACK LIVE BROADCASTS AND CLIPS RAN AROUND THE CLOCK.
DELUDED ASS HAT!
 
:lol: and shadows don't happen either..


those arent shadows dumb ass



the smoke moves at approx .01% the speed of the plane so its not noticeable genuis.

you couldnt hand someone their ass if they bought you forklift and delivered for you tard.
try again shit for brains... [ame="http://youtu.be/4q5nE-k0tUQ"]Second plane hitting The World Trade Center - YouTube[/ame]


Oh you insist on my response to this?

Apparently you need more humiliation.

Here is your cgi wingless wonder complete with the explosions its trying to mask. LMAO





this is what a real plane looks like



not too brite are you.



hope that helps
 
Last edited:
those arent shadows dumb ass



the smoke moves at approx .01% the speed of the plane so its not noticeable genuis.

you couldnt hand someone their ass if they bought you forklift and delivered for you tard.
try again shit for brains... [ame="http://youtu.be/4q5nE-k0tUQ"]Second plane hitting The World Trade Center - YouTube[/ame]


Oh you insist on my response to this?

Apparently you need more humiliation.

Here is your cgi wingless wonder complete with the explosions its trying to mask. LMAO





not too brite are you.
WRONG SHIT HEAD, that's your badly produced gif..
mine is actual footage shot as it was happening.
also the word is "bright"
you must have learned the other spelling watching the Jerry springier show.
 
Last edited:
WRONG SHIT HEAD, that's your badly produced gif..
mine is actual footage shot as it was happening.
also the word is "bright"
you must have learned the other spelling watching the Jerry springier show.

hey retardo stupido el dumfuckoroid, motions pictures are a serious of still images played in sequence, they can be slo mo'd those gifs are ,erely a different format of the same thing, and the stills for the gif are taken from the clip you posted LMAO

You are so incredibly over the top fucking stoopid I cant believe you would even show your face around here any more.

 
WRONG SHIT HEAD, that's your badly produced gif..
mine is actual footage shot as it was happening.
also the word is "bright"
you must have learned the other spelling watching the Jerry springier show.

hey retardo stupido el dumfuckoroid, motions pictures are a serious of still images played in sequence, they can be slo mo'd those gifs are ,erely a different format of the same thing, and the stills for the gif are taken from the clip you posted LMAO

You are so incredibly over the top fucking stoopid I cant believe you would even show your face around here any more.

actually you've again proven your incredible ignorance ...
I'm in the film business so you attempting to tutor me on even the basics is too fucking hilarious..
and no your gif is not from the clip I posted the angle is entirely wrong...
whoever made that piece of shit you keep posting cut and pasted all the parts to make a composite image..
oh yeah one more thing the idea that any one cares what you think about them is a farce .
 
Last edited:
actually you've again proven your incredible ignorance ...
I'm in the film business so you attempting to tutor me on even the basics is too fucking hilarious..
and no your gif is not from the clip I posted the angle is entirely wrong...
whoever made that piece of shit you keep posting cut and pasted all the parts to make a composite image..
oh yeah one more thing the idea that any one cares what you think about them is a farce .

oh yeh




talk like a tard then pull the expert card! your shit never ends.
 
Last edited:
The material evidence says that would have been impossible.

You are avoiding the question.

You said the first blob aired on tv was Sept 12. That seems to be saying that no one watched planes hit the towers on Sept 11, whether it was doctored video or not. Are you trying to tell us that the video we thought we saw on the 11th we actually saw on the 12th?

post the video with air dates that you claim to have seen on the 11th. simple as that.

I'm asking you a question. Are you telling me, and everyone else here, that what they believe they saw on September 11, 2001, they actually saw on September 12?
 
43429820.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top