Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I currently have Romney locked into 257 with the toss-up states Nevada, Iowa, Ohio, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Michigan, Pennsylvania still in play. Romney also has outside shots at Maine, Minnesota, NJ, Connecticut and Oregon and New Mexico.
Obviously, I'm very cautiously optimistic. Of course, on election night, I'll still be closely monitoring states like Virginia, Florida, NC and Colorado who I'm currently calling locked for Romney.
Ohio is in the Mitt column. PA, probably not (but still some shot for Mitt). Maine? Nah. Minnesota? No. NJ. No way. Ct? Unlikely.
Oregon? I don't t'ink so. NM? Doubtful.
BUT, MI? Yep. NH? Probable. VA, NC, FL are going to Mitt. As is CO. Throw in WI for good measure.
Mitt will win.
Gatsby.
Right. And trusted = right wing.
I'm amazed some of you guys on both wings can't see how silly that is.
Gatsby.
Right. And trusted = right wing.
I'm amazed some of you guys on both wings can't see how silly that is.
Have you considered that perhaps you're the one that wants to see what he wants to see. I mean, does it makes sense to ignore the most trusted poll (Rasmussen) in the last two presidential elections to go with often partisan and less professionally conducted polls?
Have you considered that perhaps you're the one that wants to see what he wants to see.
Romney will end up with around 301 Electoral College Votes OR MORE and the poor incumbent will end up with ~239 or fewer.
A thread headline to correct leftwhiner's silly thread headline seemed appropriate.
Consider it a public service correction effort. Can't have libs like leftwhiner spreading their disinformation like that unchallenged.
Thank me.
Have you considered that perhaps you're the one that wants to see what he wants to see.
No, it hasn't.
I'm not American, and frankly I've never heard of most of the polling companies. There are a couple like Rassmussen that are obviously biased, but most of the major ones like Gallup seem fairly balanced to me. I dare say most major organisations are going to be fairly straight, most of the little ones more suspect.
Have you considered that perhaps you're the one that wants to see what he wants to see.
No, it hasn't.
I'm not American, and frankly I've never heard of most of the polling companies. There are a couple like Rassmussen that are obviously biased, but most of the major ones like Gallup seem fairly balanced to me. I dare say most major organisations are going to be fairly straight, most of the little ones more suspect.
Nice__ way to ignore major points like Morsi. But that's fine as that's not really the scope of the discussion. But I'll reiterate that you are not on solid ground to imply that I'm partisan with your track record.
I don't think Rasmussen is far right at all. He realizes that he's selling integrity and not partisanship and that is why his brand is strong. Even the biggest hack ever, Nate Silver only claims a 1.3 point Republican bias for Rasmussen.
So, I trust Rasmussen the most by far. They have been the most accurate polling group for the last two presidential elections.
No, it hasn't.
I'm not American, and frankly I've never heard of most of the polling companies. There are a couple like Rassmussen that are obviously biased, but most of the major ones like Gallup seem fairly balanced to me. I dare say most major organisations are going to be fairly straight, most of the little ones more suspect.
Nice__ way to ignore major points like Morsi. But that's fine as that's not really the scope of the discussion. But I'll reiterate that you are not on solid ground to imply that I'm partisan with your track record.
I don't think Rasmussen is far right at all. He realizes that he's selling integrity and not partisanship and that is why his brand is strong. Even the biggest hack ever, Nate Silver only claims a 1.3 point Republican bias for Rasmussen.
So, I trust Rasmussen the most by far. They have been the most accurate polling group for the last two presidential elections.
Since the election is state by state, your narrative that Rasmussen is the most trusted does not match up with reality. They did a very poor job in state polling in 2008 and again in 2010.
Nice__ way to ignore major points like Morsi. But that's fine as that's not really the scope of the discussion. But I'll reiterate that you are not on solid ground to imply that I'm partisan with your track record.
I don't think Rasmussen is far right at all. He realizes that he's selling integrity and not partisanship and that is why his brand is strong. Even the biggest hack ever, Nate Silver only claims a 1.3 point Republican bias for Rasmussen.
So, I trust Rasmussen the most by far. They have been the most accurate polling group for the last two presidential elections.
Since the election is state by state, your narrative that Rasmussen is the most trusted does not match up with reality. They did a very poor job in state polling in 2008 and again in 2010.
And yet they still have the most accurate record for predicting presidential elections. Go figure.
Have you considered that perhaps you're the one that wants to see what he wants to see.
No, it hasn't.
I'm not American, and frankly I've never heard of most of the polling companies. There are a couple like Rassmussen that are obviously biased, but most of the major ones like Gallup seem fairly balanced to me. I dare say most major organisations are going to be fairly straight, most of the little ones more suspect.
Romney will end up with around 301 Electoral College Votes OR MORE and the poor incumbent will end up with ~239 or fewer.
A thread headline to correct leftwhiner's silly thread headline seemed appropriate.
Consider it a public service correction effort. Can't have libs like leftwhiner spreading their disinformation like that unchallenged.
Thank me.
If voting were held today, Obama would have 290 and Virginia is still tied. By election day it still looks like Obama taking 303
Wait until Rassmussen moves to center on their polling
We shall see....we shall see
I find it odd that the company that has the best record of predicting the winner and margin of victory in recent Presidential elections would be called "biased". Logic would dictate that any poll who shows a higher percentage of Democrat votes is biased.
But then the left seems to think Republicans are voting for Romney because we're biased (racist), so, I guess "bias" means something different to them.
Romney will end up with around 301 Electoral College Votes OR MORE and the poor incumbent will end up with ~239 or fewer.
A thread headline to correct leftwhiner's silly thread headline seemed appropriate.
Consider it a public service correction effort. Can't have libs like leftwhiner spreading their disinformation like that unchallenged.
Thank me.
If voting were held today, Obama would have 290 and Virginia is still tied. By election day it still looks like Obama taking 303
Wait until Rassmussen moves to center on their polling
We shall see....we shall see
Romney will end up with around 301 Electoral College Votes OR MORE and the poor incumbent will end up with ~239 or fewer.
A thread headline to correct leftwhiner's silly thread headline seemed appropriate.
Consider it a public service correction effort. Can't have libs like leftwhiner spreading their disinformation like that unchallenged.
Thank me.
If voting were held today, Obama would have 290 and Virginia is still tied. By election day it still looks like Obama taking 303
Wait until Rassmussen moves to center on their polling
We shall see....we shall see
Nonsense.
If the election were held today, Mitt would have roughly 301 to 307 EV's.
If voting were held today, Obama would have 290 and Virginia is still tied. By election day it still looks like Obama taking 303
Wait until Rassmussen moves to center on their polling
We shall see....we shall see
Nonsense.
If the election were held today, Mitt would have roughly 301 to 307 EV's.
Show me any credible poll that has those numbers
Nonsense.
If the election were held today, Mitt would have roughly 301 to 307 EV's.
Show me any credible poll that has those numbers
"Credible poll."
Sorry you haven't learned how to distill the bullshit out of the crap you wish to see.
I find it odd that the company that has the best record of predicting the winner and margin of victory in recent Presidential elections would be called "biased". Logic would dictate that any poll who shows a higher percentage of Democrat votes is biased.
But then the left seems to think Republicans are voting for Romney because we're biased (racist), so, I guess "bias" means something different to them.
Bias isn't something either left or right has a monopoly on.
But Rassmussen seem to have a reputation for producing right-friendly results until the final few days, and I suspect there is some fire behind that smoke.
I've not heard the same accusation made about Gallup or any of the other major organisations.
Neither do I think race is an issue here, btw.
Thumb sucking libbies STILL place "value" in bullshit like "intrade."
That's just real funny.
And the other "polls" are engaged in Dim over-sampling.
Watch and learn.
Start with RCP as is. ADD to the Mitt totals, FL, NC, VA and CO. Then for fun, toss in NH. Maybe Wis. Probably not PA (although still possible). And OH is going to Mitt. Sorry my lib pals.
I won't taunt you after Mitt wins.
(Except to the extent that I will taunt you mercilessly, of course. But, other than that.)
Ohio is in the Mitt column. PA, probably not (but still some shot for Mitt). Maine? Nah. Minnesota? No. NJ. No way. Ct? Unlikely.
Oregon? I don't t'ink so. NM? Doubtful.
BUT, MI? Yep. NH? Probable. VA, NC, FL are going to Mitt. As is CO. Throw in WI for good measure.
Mitt will win.
Nonsense.
If the election were held today, Mitt would have roughly 301 to 307 EV's.
"Credible poll."
Sorry you haven't learned how to distill the bullshit out of the crap you wish to see.
