The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects
- Thread starter TruthSeeker112125
- Start date
candycorn
Diamond Member
Wrong."Just minutes after the attack, standing in front of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, Jamie McIntyre, CNN's senior Pentagon correspondent since November 1992, reported to Judy Woodruff:
=================
March 7, 2005 (updated 02/13/09)
The Wisdom Fund
What Really Happened at the Pentagon on 9/11 (September 11, 2001)
"There was, writes Kwiatkowski,
Barbara Honegger, military affairs journalist and former White House policy analyst, writes NORAD's
"
Hole reported made by a Boeing 757
The hole in the Pentagon wall - prior to the collapse of the roof - appears much too small to accomodate a Boeing 757. If only the front end penetrated the Pentagon, then the wings, a portion of the fuselage, and tail would have remained outside. But no large debris - anything resembling the Boeing 757 wings, fuselage, or tail - is visible on the Pentagon lawn, and the lawn itself shows no sign that a Boeing 757 skidded across it or struck it.
The engines of the Boeing 757 would have survived the impact and heat. An engine from a plane that struck the World Trade Center was shown on network television, and so was an engine from American Airlines Flight 587 which crashed shortly after takeoff from New York on November 12, 2001."
...................................................................................................................................................................................
"
In response to another question: "Chief, there are small pieces of the plane virtually all over, out over the highway, tiny pieces. Would you say the plane exploded, virtually exploded on impact due to the fuel", Plaugher responded: "You know, I'd rather not comment on that."
Victoria Clarke, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs - "presenter" of the DoD briefing, did not contradict Chief Plaugher.
Evidence that a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon?
Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, who from her fifth-floor, B-ring office at the Pentagon, witnessed "an unforgettable fireball, 20 to 30 feet in diameter," was called for stretcher duty as she and others
There was, writes Kwiatkowski,
Barbara Honegger, military affairs journalist and former White House policy analyst, writes NORAD's
Publicly available photos support these statements by Jamie McIntyre, Ed Plaugher, Karen Kwiatkowski, and Barbara Honegger.
Questions about what hit the Pentagon on September 11, continued to be raised at the Dept. of Defense News Briefing on September 15, 2001.
Hole reported made by a Boeing 757
The hole in the Pentagon wall - prior to the collapse of the roof - appears much too small to accomodate a Boeing 757. If only the front end penetrated the Pentagon, then the wings, a portion of the fuselage, and tail would have remained outside. But no large debris - anything resembling the Boeing 757 wings, fuselage, or tail - is visible on the Pentagon lawn, and the lawn itself shows no sign that a Boeing 757 skidded across it or struck it.
The engines of the Boeing 757 would have survived the impact and heat. An engine from a plane that struck the World Trade Center was shown on network television, and so was an engine from American Airlines Flight 587 which crashed shortly after takeoff from New York on November 12, 2001.
One photo from the Pentagon crash site shows what could be an engine part about 30 inches in diameter outside the Pentagon. Another photo shows what could be an engine part (its size is difficult to determine) inside the Pentagon. Were these parts, and another piece of debris on the Pentagon lawn traced to Flight 77?
According to George Nelson, Colonel, USAF (ret.), serial numbers on aircraft parts could confirm the plane's identity. But the FBI has refused to make that evidence available to the public.
Another question put to Chief Plaugher at the briefing was:
Plaugher responded: "I'd rather not comment on that." How did "small pieces of the plane" end up "out over the highway" when the plane is reported to have disintegrated inside the Pentagon after it crossed the highway? If it disintegrated outside the Pentagon why is there nothing that looks like a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon lawn? If it disintegrated either inside or outside the Pentagon what caused the hole in C-ring?
What made this hole in C-ring?
When asked, "Have you removed the bodies?" Chief Plaugher replied, "We have no information on any type of casualty or body counts at this time."
National news media, particularly Jamie McIntyre, failed to follow up on Chief Plaugher's comment that "there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing" when dozens of onlookers, relatives, and firefighters were interviewed on network television about the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center.
Light poles and highway sign in or below reported flight-path
Photos and videos of the Pentagon reveal yet more curious sights: a trailer, light poles, and a highway sign in front of the damaged area still intact after a Boeing 757 is alleged to have flown through there; office furniture and a computer monitor which survived the fire that is alleged to have vaporized the Boeing 757, but left human bodies in good enough condition to be indentified; two men in white shirts and ties rushing to pick up pieces of whatever struck the Pentagon; "50 FBI officers" walking "shoulder-to-shoulder across the south grounds of the Pentagon, picking up debris and stuffing it into brown bags."
These FBI officers did not follow standard NTSB procedures. This NTSB checklist is designed to lead investigators through the steps required for a major aircraft accident investigation.
The Pentagon crash may be the only commercial airline crash in modern history in which most of the available evidence has been withheld from the public. What is available looks remarkably different from other crash sites. Reporters on the scene were denied access, and "handcuffed and dragged away".
Many eyewitnesses reported seeing a large plane hit the Pentagon. Others reported seeing a commuter plane (Could this have been a cruise missile?). However, their accounts are contradicted by more credible witnesses -- CNN's Jamie McIntyre, Fire Chief Plaugher, and Col. Kwiatowski.
Then there's the May 23, 2003 testimony of Norman Y. Mineta, Former Secretary of Transportation, that Vice President Richard B. Cheney may have given a do not shoot order to facilitate an attack on the Pentagon.
In response to a question by the Vice-Chairman of Commission, Mr. Mineta states:
Five video frames initially released by the Pentagon raised more questions than they answered - no Boeing 757 was visible. Videos released on May 16, 2006, pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch, are as inconclusive as the first five frames.
Further doubt has been cast on the official account of Flight 77 by Pilots for 9/11 Truth. They claim that "video captured by the parking gate cam is in direct conflict with the Aircraft Flight Data Recorder data released by the NTSB."
The 9/11 Commission Report animation (July 2004) shows an aircraft flying south of the Navy Annex. The video captured by Pentagon security cameras shows an object flying level before striking the Pentagon. The NTSB animation (January 2002), according to the pilots' organization, shows an aircraft flying north of the Navy Annex, not levelling off, and being too high to have hit the Pentagon.
The Citizen Investigation Team has tracked down credible eyewitnesses, and some remarkable photos, that corroborate the findings of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, and undermine the official explanation.
And there are unresolved issues regarding the complex maneuver executed by the alleged pilot of Flight 77, and the identities of the alleged hijackers.
CBS News reported:
Reported flight-path of Boeing 757
The New York Times reported that Hani Hanjour "could not fly at all."
His reported lack of flying skills makes it highly unlikely that he could fly a Boeing 757 in a spiral turn from 7000 feet, over a communications tower on the downslope south of the Navy Annex, over a highway sign on Route 27, over light poles on the off ramp, level off at an estimated 350 mph [sic] in the remaining 150 yards - "the top of the fuselage of the aircraft no more than 20 ft above the ground" (Pentagon Building Performance Report, p14), and strike the first floor of the 5-story, 71 feet tall Pentagon.
Light poles in flight-path of Boeing 757
The names of the alleged hijackers do not appear on Associated Press' September 17, 2001 "partial list of victims" on the hijacked flights. Hani Hanjour's "name was not on the American Airlines manifest for the flight because he may not have had a ticket" reported the Washington Post. At the Zacarias Moussaoui trial in July of 2006 the prosecution presented new passenger lists.
On September 23, 2001 the BBC reported that four of the hijack "suspects" - Waleed Al Shehri, Abdulaziz Al Omari, Saeed Alghamdi, and possibly Khalid Al Midhar were - alive, and that FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged "that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt."
The FBI's "Most Wanted Terrorists" web page does not state that Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on September 11.
In a speech at the Commonwealth Club on April 19, 2002, FBI Director Mueller said :
Just prior to September 11, 2001, a congressional committee was investigating unaccounted funds at the DoD. The section of the Pentagon destroyed is said to have housed records of DoD spending and the personnel for monitoring that spending.
After September 11, 2001 about 5,000 foreign nationals were detained, and denied basic constitutional rights, in the name of "wartime" expediency.
On March 4, 2004, a German court "overturned the world's only conviction" in connection with the September 11 attack on America "because the U.S. withheld crucial evidence.
9/11 Facts, History — Not Propaganda
Tweet
Follow @wisdomfund
VIDEO: "I don't know exactly what hit it, but I do know, from the photographs that I have analyzed and looked at very, very carefully, it was not an airplane." -- Major General Albert Stubblebine
Enver Masud, "Deadly Deception, Pretexts for War," The Wisdom Fund, July 30, 2001
VIDEO: "Rumsfeld Admits to Unaccounted, Missing 2.3 Trillion Dollars," CBS News, September 10, 2001 -- original removed see this
[After analysis of the passenger lists of the four hijacked flights and other immigration documents, investigators identified Salem Al-Hazmi and Abdulaziz Al-Omari as two of the terrorists.
The real Salem Al-Hazmi, however, is alive and indignant in Saudi Arabia, and not one of the people who perished in the American Airlines flight that crashed on the Pentagon.--Nick Hopkins, "False identities mislead FBI," Guardian, September 21, 2001]
[Captain Defina drove onto the heliport and directed Foam Unit 331 to set up there, where Fort Myer Rescue Engine 161 had established a hydrant water supply. The only other firefighting apparatus he saw on the west side was Arlington County's Engine and Truck 105 on the far north end.--Stephen Murphy, "ARFF Crews Respond to the Front Line at Pentagon," NFPA Journal, November 1, 2001]
VIDEO: 9/11 Pentagon Strike, 2001
Enver Masud, "What Really Happened on September 11 Remains a Mystery," The Wisdom Fund, April 27, 2002
"New simulation shows 9/11 plane crash with scientific detail," Purdue News, September, 2002
[An examination of the area encompassed by extending the line of travel of the aircraft to the face of the building shows that there are no discrete marks on the building corresponding to the positions of the outer third of the right wing. The size and position of the actual opening in the facade of the building (from column line 8 to column line 18) indicate that no portion of the outer two-thirds of the right wing and no portion of the outer one-third of the left wing actually entered the building. (page 35)
The height of the damage to the facade of the building was much less than the height of the aircraft's tail. At approximately 45 ft, the tail height was nearly as tall as the first four floors of the building. Obvious visible damage extended only over the lowest two floors, to approximately 25 ft above grade. (page 36)
Most likely, the wings of the aircraft were severed as the aircraft penetrated the facade of the building. Even if portions of the wings remained intact after passing through the plane of the facade, the structural damage pattern indicates that the wings were severed before the aircraft penetrated more than a few dozen feet into the building. (page 39)--Paul F. Mlaker, et al, "Pentagon Building Performance Report," NIST, January 2003]
Carol Valentine, "9-11 PENTAGON FIRE COVER-UP," January 16, 2004
Michel Chossudovsky, "'Revealing the Lies' on 9/11 Destroys the Truth," Centre for Research on Globalisation, May 27, 2004
[. . . the Pentagon was hit by hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 . . . all 64 people aboard the airliner were killed--"The 9/11 Commission Report", July 22, 2004, p314]
Enver Masud, "Why No Arab Names on Passenger Lists?", July 26, 2004
Sami Yli-Karjanmaa, "The ASCE's Pentagon Building Performance Report: Arrogant Deception Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up," bibliotecapleyades.net, September 5, 2004
Enver Masud, "New 'Prime Suspect in the Mass Murders of 9/11'," The Wisdom Fund, September 8, 2004
Sandro Cruz, "Spanish Reporters Affirm no Aircraft Crashed into the Pentagon," voltairenet.org, September 13, 2004
David Ray Griffin, "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions," Olive Branch Press (November 30, 2004)
A. K. Dewdney and G. W. Longspaugh, "The Missing Wings," physics911.net, December 19, 2004
Enver Masud, "9/11: An Open Letter to The Washington Post," The Wisdom Fund, March 3, 2005
Enver Masud, "9/11: An Open Letter to The New York Times," The Wisdom Fund, March 4, 2005
Enver Masud, "9/11: An Open Letter to the Los Angeles Times," The Wisdom Fund, March 7, 2005
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, "The War On Truth: 9/11, Disinformation And The Anatomy Of Terrorism," Olive Branch Press (April 15, 2005)
[In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft - and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling. . . .
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items--George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.), "911 and the Precautionary Principle: Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity," Physics911.net, April 23, 2005]
C-SPAN AUDIO / VIDEO / VIDEO: David Ray Griffin, "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions," Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, April 28, 2005
Michael Shermer, Fahrenheit 2777: 9/11 has generated the mother of all conspiracy theories, Scientific American, May 23, 2005
[The U.S. Department of Justice has yet to respond to an October 24, 2005 appeal, filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), for 85 videotapes of the September 11, 2001 crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
The existence of the videotapes "in the possession of the FBI [was] described in the declaration of Special Agent ("SA") Jacqueline Maguire dated September 7, 2005, in the lawsuit captioned Bingham v. United States Department of Justice," according to Scott A. Hodes, Attorney at Law.--FOIA request for videotapes of 9/11 Pentagon crash stalled, 9/11 Special Interest Group, January 1, 2006]
["I could see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit windshield or other window from the plane."--Jamie McIntyre, "Debris," Pentagon Research]
[Then I picked it up as it struck very low into the Pentagon. The wings folded back and it was like watching someone slam an empty aluminum can into a wall. The jet folded up like an accordion. . . . I knew it was a big commercial airline. I saw the AA on the side so I knew it was an American Airlines passenger jet.--Mike Walter, "Debris," Pentagon Research]
[She said Hanjour, a Saudi who is believed to have piloted the American Airlines plane that crashed into the Pentagon, was a poor pilot who spoke limited English.--Jerry Markon and William Branigin, "FAA Reportedly Dismissed Moussaoui Concern," Washington Post, March 22, 2006]
[The physical and eyewitness evidence are thus mutually corroborating--Jim Hoffman, "The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows," 911research, March 28, 2006]
VIDEO: Pierre-Henri Bunel, New official 9/11 video: The Pentagon Magic Plane, Global Research, May 19, 2006
Dan Eggen, "9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon," Washington Post, August 2, 2006
[We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircraft to have struck down the light poles.--"Flight Data Recorder Analysis - Last Second of Data - 09:37:44," pilotsfor911truth.org, August 20, 2006]
[Clearly, if the official story that flight 77 hit the Pentagon at 9:37 were true, Flight 77 could not have been the source of massive damage to the west side of the building a minimum of five minutes earlier at 9:32. . . . Multiple standard-issue, battery-operated wall clocks . . . stopped between 9:31 and 9:32-1/2 on September 11. . . .
The Pentagon was attacked by bomb(s) at or around 9:32 am, possibly followed by an impact from an airborne object significantly smaller than Flight 77, a Boeing 757. . . .
Gen. Larry Arnold, revealed that he ordered one of his jets to fly down low over the Pentagon shortly after the attack that morning, and that his pilot reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building. The fighter jet - not flight 77 - is almost certainly the plane seen on the Dulles airport Air Traffic Controller's screen making a steep, high-speed 270-degree descent before disappearing from the radar. . . .
Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building.--Barbara Honegger, "The Pentagon Attack Papers," physics911.net, September 6, 2006]
[Note: Exhibits P200023 through P200041 are photographs of "of the Pentagon after Flight 77 crashed into the building". Photographs that tell a different story are not included.--"United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui, Criminal No. 01-455-A, Prosecution Trial Exhibits," uscourts.gov, 2006]
VIDEO: "OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11 FLIGHT CONTRADICTED BY GOVERNMENT'S OWN DATA," pilotsfor911truth.org, March 26, 2007
Jerry Mazza, "Following Zakheim And The Pentagon Trillions To Israel And 911," rense.com, March 28, 2007
John C. Ekonomou, "Mineta, Cheney and 'the orders still stand' controversy," journalof911studies.com, May 1, 2007
"In pictures: Brazil plane crash," The Wisdom Fund, July 18, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson, "9/11 First Responder Heard WTC 7 Demolition Countdown," Prison Planet, September 13, 2007
Aidan Monaghan, "FBI Refuses To Confirm Identities Of 4 Aircraft Used During 9/11 Attacks," 911blogger.com, October 3, 2007
PHOTOS: "Airbus A340-642X Crash," Toulouse, France, 15th November, 2007
"Documenting the legal process to obtain confiscated videos showing Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon on 9/11," flight77.info, 2007
[The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson's story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an "unconnected call," which (of course) lasted "0 seconds." According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.--David Ray Griffin, "Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials," Global Research, April 1, 2008]
Craig Ranke and Rob Balsamo, "The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irreconcilable with the Official Reports and Data," opednews.com, April 23, 2008
FREE BOOK: Enver Masud, "9/11 Unveiled," The Wisdom Fund (September 11, 2008)
VIDEO: Physically and aerodynamically, Arlington's unique topography and obstacles along American 77 "final leg" to the Pentagon, make this approach completely impossible--Rob Balsamo, "Arlington Topography, Obstacles Make American 77 Final Leg Impossible," Pilots For 9/11 Truth, September 12, 2008
VIDEO: "G-FORCES: 9/11 ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON," Pilots For 9/11 Truth, September 15, 2008
[April Gallop's . . . desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane allegedly hit the outside wall. As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. Hit in the head, she was able to grab the baby and make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no airplane wreckage and no burning airplane fuel anywhere; only rubble and dust. . . .
Defendant Rumsfeld in particular has been deceptive from the start, as where, on September 13, he reported on Good Morning, America that the plane "...went in through three rings (of the Pentagon). I'm told the nose is - is still in there, very close to the inner courtyard, about one ring away"--"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK," rawstory.com, December 17, 2008]
Anonymous, "Flight 77 path and lightpole struck," flickcabin.com, December 20, 2008
[Pentagon police officers SGT William Lagasse and SGT Chadwick Brooks say plane flew North of CITGO gas station . . . Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts Jr. saw the plane flying away from the building immediately after the event.--VIDEO: "The North Side Flyover," Citizen Investigation Team, 2008]
VIDEO: "Cab Driver LLoyde England's Virtual Confession," Citizen Investigation Team, 2008
What caused the debris in the foreground?
Enver Masud, "When Did Fort Meyer Fire Department Foam Unit 161 Arrive at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?," The Wisdom Fund, January 1, 2009
VIDEO: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON," Pilots For 9/11 Truth, January 4, 2009
[ . . . the 13 witnesses deliver a devastating blow to the official story about the Pentagon attack. Five 40-foot, 247-pound light poles were knocked down that day. If the plane flew north of the Citgo station, it could not have knocked down those poles. The west side of the Pentagon was damaged as if it were hit by a plane heading north, with the zone of destruction angling north. If the plane flew to the north of the Citgo station before hitting the Pentagon, it would not have caused this kind of damage.--Sheila Casey, "Eyewitnesses Contradict Pentagon 9/11 Story," Rock Creek Free Press, April 2009]
"U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Last Known Flights Of 9/11 Planes Took Place Nine Months Before 9/11; None For AA 77," 911blogger.com, June 23, 2009
VIDEO: "Eyewitness: How Accurate Is Visual Memory," CBS 60 Minutes, July 12, 2009
Enver Masud, "Flight 77: FBI exhibit contradicts Solicitor General's account of Barbara Olson's phone calls on 9/11," 911sig.blogspot.com, November 17, 2009
[ . . . two F-16s were always maintained on alert at Andrews and armed, that is, until September 11, 2001.
Also in response to the Cessna crash, White House Secret Service personnel armed with portable surface-to-air missile launchers were placed on the roof of the presidential mansion.
On that particular morning, an exercise was being conducted that resulted in the two stand-by F-16s being flown without their heat-seeking missiles.--"Two F-16s on alert to counter attacks on Washington ordered to stand down on 9/11," waynemadsenreport.com, November 25, 2009]
Rob Balsamo, "Flight Deck Door Closed For Entire Flight," pilotsfor911truth.org, November 27, 2009
Rob Balsamo, "NORTH APPROACH IMPACT ANALYSIS," pilotsfor911truth.org, January 2, 2010
"9-11 Coordinated By Cheney," waynemadsenreport.com, April 30, 2010
Enver Masud, "Pentagon Transcripts, Official Records Belie 'The 9/11 Commission Report'," The Wisdom Fund, September 10, 2010
[Bush reveals that he gave the order for any further suspected hijacked planes to be shot down after the first aircraft were flown into the World Trade Centre--James Meikle, "George Bush thought 9/11 plane had been shot down on his orders," Guardian, October 29, 2010]
"Instructor/Airshow Pilot Questions 911 Scenario," December 23, 2010
[Flight Data Recorder Expert Dennis Cimino has confirmed that the data being provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is missing crucial information, which according to Dennis, should be present and link the data to a specific aircraft and fleet. . . . The data also exceeds the design limitations and capabilities of a standard 757 by a wide margin.--Rob Balsamo, "Flight Data Expert Confirmation: No Evidence Linking FDR Data to American 77," pilotsfor911truth.org, January 20, 2011]
Rob Balsamo, "Aircraft Departure Gate Positional Data Conflicts With Government Story," pilotsfor911truth.org, February 28, 2011
Rob Balsamo, "Overwhelming Evidence Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757," pilotsfor911truth.org, March 3, 2011
March 25, 2011
Webster Griffin Tarpley, "The Forty-Six Exercises and Drills of 9/11," truthjihad.com, August 20, 2011
[The 3 exit holes are perfectly round and look more like a punch out hole made from a shape charge. There is a V shaped symbol with a line through it which is an international rescue symbol for dead victims removed. This tells rescue workers that all victims have been removed. There were 3 C ring exit holes.--"Barbara Honegger And The Pentagon Attack Papers in 2 Minutes," vidrebel.wordpress.com, September 11, 2011]
MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION: Enver Masud, "9/11: The Pentagon," 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, June 15, 2012
VIDEO: Dennis Cimino, "911 Pentagon Flight Recorder Fraud Revealed," 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, June 18, 2012
Enver Masud, "9/11: Evidence of Complicity and Cover-up at the Pentagon," The Wisdom Fund, July 12, 2012
FILM: Massimo Mazzucco, "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor," luogocomune.net, 2013 [Missing black boxes at 1.20.15]
VIDEO: "9/11 Aircraft - Why Fly So Fast?," pilotsfor911truth.org, June 9, 2014
"American Airlines Flight 77 Hijack Impossible, FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT," pilotsfor911truth.org, June 23, 2014
DISSENTING VIEW: "Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate," foreignpolicyjournal.com, October 7, 2016
Abhimanyu Ghoshal, "Eerie tech promises to copy anyone's voice from just 1 minute of audio," thenextweb.com, April 24, 2017
[The assertion by Scientists for 9/11 Truth that Sandia National Laboratories' F-4 Phantom jet test represents what happened at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 is utter nonsense--Enver Masud, "Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate? Evidence Contradicts Scientists for 9/11 Truth," The Wisdom Fund, August 30, 2017]
Jack White's 9/11 Photo Studies
Any word on what took down the light poles if it wasn’t AA77?
candycorn
Diamond Member
That the 9/11 truthers are dickless and can’t explain even the most basic physical evidenece.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,210
- 17,817
- 2,788
So when is Mossad going to fly a 757 for us at 600 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground?
And we're still waiting for 30 of you to take off in motorized paragliders, fly 3 miles in formation and land at a target destination....
and you won't do that either....
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,210
- 17,817
- 2,788
The cruise missile has a considerable air wake.
There also is no "mark" on the poles where the "plane" clipped them.
And if the plane's wing had clipped one, it would have triggered a cartwheel effect...
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,210
- 17,817
- 2,788
And, of course, there was no airplane wreckage outside of Pentagon, so we are to believe the entire plane, wings and all, penetrated steel reinforced concrete....
Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 20,943
- 6,400
- 335
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 51,592
- 18,927
- 2,250
Being that mere birds are capable of doing this kind of damage to Jet Air liners,....... It's amazing that Candy's light poles could stand in a weak wind,. So Candy,.... what were/are Commercial Grade light poles made of where they do not shear off the wings, etc. of a Jet Air LIner, nor leave any wreckage in the Pentagon Parking lot? :
Airplane Damage From Birds - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.www.bing.com
Its always a blast seeing langley agent candyass owned. Here is you standing up mocking candyass as you just knocked him out cold and he has no idea where he is,no idea that he stepped into a boxing ring with you.great picture of both of you,we learn today you are both black.
we learn something new everyday,candyass can only post laughing smileys and sling shit in defeat in defeat on that floor like the monkey troll he is.
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 51,592
- 18,927
- 2,250
yeah these paid shills of langley want to try and convince us an ALMUMININ airliner which gets puntuated to PIECES by merely BIRDS hitting them as someone just showed recently,,somehow in their wildest fantasys was able to penetrate steel reinforced concrete that day and went through steel framed towers as well. they excel at comedy dont they?And, of course, there was no airplane wreckage outside of Pentagon, so we are to believe the entire plane, wings and all, penetrated steel reinforced concrete....
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 51,592
- 18,927
- 2,250
"Just minutes after the attack, standing in front of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, Jamie McIntyre, CNN's senior Pentagon correspondent since November 1992, reported to Judy Woodruff:
=================
March 7, 2005 (updated 02/13/09)
The Wisdom Fund
What Really Happened at the Pentagon on 9/11 (September 11, 2001)
"There was, writes Kwiatkowski,
Barbara Honegger, military affairs journalist and former White House policy analyst, writes NORAD's
"
Hole reported made by a Boeing 757
The hole in the Pentagon wall - prior to the collapse of the roof - appears much too small to accomodate a Boeing 757. If only the front end penetrated the Pentagon, then the wings, a portion of the fuselage, and tail would have remained outside. But no large debris - anything resembling the Boeing 757 wings, fuselage, or tail - is visible on the Pentagon lawn, and the lawn itself shows no sign that a Boeing 757 skidded across it or struck it.
The engines of the Boeing 757 would have survived the impact and heat. An engine from a plane that struck the World Trade Center was shown on network television, and so was an engine from American Airlines Flight 587 which crashed shortly after takeoff from New York on November 12, 2001."
...................................................................................................................................................................................
"
In response to another question: "Chief, there are small pieces of the plane virtually all over, out over the highway, tiny pieces. Would you say the plane exploded, virtually exploded on impact due to the fuel", Plaugher responded: "You know, I'd rather not comment on that."
Victoria Clarke, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs - "presenter" of the DoD briefing, did not contradict Chief Plaugher.
Evidence that a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon?
Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, who from her fifth-floor, B-ring office at the Pentagon, witnessed "an unforgettable fireball, 20 to 30 feet in diameter," was called for stretcher duty as she and others
There was, writes Kwiatkowski,
Barbara Honegger, military affairs journalist and former White House policy analyst, writes NORAD's
Publicly available photos support these statements by Jamie McIntyre, Ed Plaugher, Karen Kwiatkowski, and Barbara Honegger.
Questions about what hit the Pentagon on September 11, continued to be raised at the Dept. of Defense News Briefing on September 15, 2001.
Hole reported made by a Boeing 757
The hole in the Pentagon wall - prior to the collapse of the roof - appears much too small to accomodate a Boeing 757. If only the front end penetrated the Pentagon, then the wings, a portion of the fuselage, and tail would have remained outside. But no large debris - anything resembling the Boeing 757 wings, fuselage, or tail - is visible on the Pentagon lawn, and the lawn itself shows no sign that a Boeing 757 skidded across it or struck it.
The engines of the Boeing 757 would have survived the impact and heat. An engine from a plane that struck the World Trade Center was shown on network television, and so was an engine from American Airlines Flight 587 which crashed shortly after takeoff from New York on November 12, 2001.
One photo from the Pentagon crash site shows what could be an engine part about 30 inches in diameter outside the Pentagon. Another photo shows what could be an engine part (its size is difficult to determine) inside the Pentagon. Were these parts, and another piece of debris on the Pentagon lawn traced to Flight 77?
According to George Nelson, Colonel, USAF (ret.), serial numbers on aircraft parts could confirm the plane's identity. But the FBI has refused to make that evidence available to the public.
Another question put to Chief Plaugher at the briefing was:
Plaugher responded: "I'd rather not comment on that." How did "small pieces of the plane" end up "out over the highway" when the plane is reported to have disintegrated inside the Pentagon after it crossed the highway? If it disintegrated outside the Pentagon why is there nothing that looks like a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon lawn? If it disintegrated either inside or outside the Pentagon what caused the hole in C-ring?
What made this hole in C-ring?
When asked, "Have you removed the bodies?" Chief Plaugher replied, "We have no information on any type of casualty or body counts at this time."
National news media, particularly Jamie McIntyre, failed to follow up on Chief Plaugher's comment that "there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing" when dozens of onlookers, relatives, and firefighters were interviewed on network television about the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center.
Light poles and highway sign in or below reported flight-path
Photos and videos of the Pentagon reveal yet more curious sights: a trailer, light poles, and a highway sign in front of the damaged area still intact after a Boeing 757 is alleged to have flown through there; office furniture and a computer monitor which survived the fire that is alleged to have vaporized the Boeing 757, but left human bodies in good enough condition to be indentified; two men in white shirts and ties rushing to pick up pieces of whatever struck the Pentagon; "50 FBI officers" walking "shoulder-to-shoulder across the south grounds of the Pentagon, picking up debris and stuffing it into brown bags."
These FBI officers did not follow standard NTSB procedures. This NTSB checklist is designed to lead investigators through the steps required for a major aircraft accident investigation.
The Pentagon crash may be the only commercial airline crash in modern history in which most of the available evidence has been withheld from the public. What is available looks remarkably different from other crash sites. Reporters on the scene were denied access, and "handcuffed and dragged away".
Many eyewitnesses reported seeing a large plane hit the Pentagon. Others reported seeing a commuter plane (Could this have been a cruise missile?). However, their accounts are contradicted by more credible witnesses -- CNN's Jamie McIntyre, Fire Chief Plaugher, and Col. Kwiatowski.
Then there's the May 23, 2003 testimony of Norman Y. Mineta, Former Secretary of Transportation, that Vice President Richard B. Cheney may have given a do not shoot order to facilitate an attack on the Pentagon.
In response to a question by the Vice-Chairman of Commission, Mr. Mineta states:
Five video frames initially released by the Pentagon raised more questions than they answered - no Boeing 757 was visible. Videos released on May 16, 2006, pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch, are as inconclusive as the first five frames.
Further doubt has been cast on the official account of Flight 77 by Pilots for 9/11 Truth. They claim that "video captured by the parking gate cam is in direct conflict with the Aircraft Flight Data Recorder data released by the NTSB."
The 9/11 Commission Report animation (July 2004) shows an aircraft flying south of the Navy Annex. The video captured by Pentagon security cameras shows an object flying level before striking the Pentagon. The NTSB animation (January 2002), according to the pilots' organization, shows an aircraft flying north of the Navy Annex, not levelling off, and being too high to have hit the Pentagon.
The Citizen Investigation Team has tracked down credible eyewitnesses, and some remarkable photos, that corroborate the findings of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, and undermine the official explanation.
And there are unresolved issues regarding the complex maneuver executed by the alleged pilot of Flight 77, and the identities of the alleged hijackers.
CBS News reported:
Reported flight-path of Boeing 757
The New York Times reported that Hani Hanjour "could not fly at all."
His reported lack of flying skills makes it highly unlikely that he could fly a Boeing 757 in a spiral turn from 7000 feet, over a communications tower on the downslope south of the Navy Annex, over a highway sign on Route 27, over light poles on the off ramp, level off at an estimated 350 mph [sic] in the remaining 150 yards - "the top of the fuselage of the aircraft no more than 20 ft above the ground" (Pentagon Building Performance Report, p14), and strike the first floor of the 5-story, 71 feet tall Pentagon.
Light poles in flight-path of Boeing 757
The names of the alleged hijackers do not appear on Associated Press' September 17, 2001 "partial list of victims" on the hijacked flights. Hani Hanjour's "name was not on the American Airlines manifest for the flight because he may not have had a ticket" reported the Washington Post. At the Zacarias Moussaoui trial in July of 2006 the prosecution presented new passenger lists.
On September 23, 2001 the BBC reported that four of the hijack "suspects" - Waleed Al Shehri, Abdulaziz Al Omari, Saeed Alghamdi, and possibly Khalid Al Midhar were - alive, and that FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged "that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt."
The FBI's "Most Wanted Terrorists" web page does not state that Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on September 11.
In a speech at the Commonwealth Club on April 19, 2002, FBI Director Mueller said :
Just prior to September 11, 2001, a congressional committee was investigating unaccounted funds at the DoD. The section of the Pentagon destroyed is said to have housed records of DoD spending and the personnel for monitoring that spending.
After September 11, 2001 about 5,000 foreign nationals were detained, and denied basic constitutional rights, in the name of "wartime" expediency.
On March 4, 2004, a German court "overturned the world's only conviction" in connection with the September 11 attack on America "because the U.S. withheld crucial evidence.
9/11 Facts, History — Not Propaganda
Tweet
Follow @wisdomfund
VIDEO: "I don't know exactly what hit it, but I do know, from the photographs that I have analyzed and looked at very, very carefully, it was not an airplane." -- Major General Albert Stubblebine
Enver Masud, "Deadly Deception, Pretexts for War," The Wisdom Fund, July 30, 2001
VIDEO: "Rumsfeld Admits to Unaccounted, Missing 2.3 Trillion Dollars," CBS News, September 10, 2001 -- original removed see this
[After analysis of the passenger lists of the four hijacked flights and other immigration documents, investigators identified Salem Al-Hazmi and Abdulaziz Al-Omari as two of the terrorists.
The real Salem Al-Hazmi, however, is alive and indignant in Saudi Arabia, and not one of the people who perished in the American Airlines flight that crashed on the Pentagon.--Nick Hopkins, "False identities mislead FBI," Guardian, September 21, 2001]
[Captain Defina drove onto the heliport and directed Foam Unit 331 to set up there, where Fort Myer Rescue Engine 161 had established a hydrant water supply. The only other firefighting apparatus he saw on the west side was Arlington County's Engine and Truck 105 on the far north end.--Stephen Murphy, "ARFF Crews Respond to the Front Line at Pentagon," NFPA Journal, November 1, 2001]
VIDEO: 9/11 Pentagon Strike, 2001
Enver Masud, "What Really Happened on September 11 Remains a Mystery," The Wisdom Fund, April 27, 2002
"New simulation shows 9/11 plane crash with scientific detail," Purdue News, September, 2002
[An examination of the area encompassed by extending the line of travel of the aircraft to the face of the building shows that there are no discrete marks on the building corresponding to the positions of the outer third of the right wing. The size and position of the actual opening in the facade of the building (from column line 8 to column line 18) indicate that no portion of the outer two-thirds of the right wing and no portion of the outer one-third of the left wing actually entered the building. (page 35)
The height of the damage to the facade of the building was much less than the height of the aircraft's tail. At approximately 45 ft, the tail height was nearly as tall as the first four floors of the building. Obvious visible damage extended only over the lowest two floors, to approximately 25 ft above grade. (page 36)
Most likely, the wings of the aircraft were severed as the aircraft penetrated the facade of the building. Even if portions of the wings remained intact after passing through the plane of the facade, the structural damage pattern indicates that the wings were severed before the aircraft penetrated more than a few dozen feet into the building. (page 39)--Paul F. Mlaker, et al, "Pentagon Building Performance Report," NIST, January 2003]
Carol Valentine, "9-11 PENTAGON FIRE COVER-UP," January 16, 2004
Michel Chossudovsky, "'Revealing the Lies' on 9/11 Destroys the Truth," Centre for Research on Globalisation, May 27, 2004
[. . . the Pentagon was hit by hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 . . . all 64 people aboard the airliner were killed--"The 9/11 Commission Report", July 22, 2004, p314]
Enver Masud, "Why No Arab Names on Passenger Lists?", July 26, 2004
Sami Yli-Karjanmaa, "The ASCE's Pentagon Building Performance Report: Arrogant Deception Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up," bibliotecapleyades.net, September 5, 2004
Enver Masud, "New 'Prime Suspect in the Mass Murders of 9/11'," The Wisdom Fund, September 8, 2004
Sandro Cruz, "Spanish Reporters Affirm no Aircraft Crashed into the Pentagon," voltairenet.org, September 13, 2004
David Ray Griffin, "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions," Olive Branch Press (November 30, 2004)
A. K. Dewdney and G. W. Longspaugh, "The Missing Wings," physics911.net, December 19, 2004
Enver Masud, "9/11: An Open Letter to The Washington Post," The Wisdom Fund, March 3, 2005
Enver Masud, "9/11: An Open Letter to The New York Times," The Wisdom Fund, March 4, 2005
Enver Masud, "9/11: An Open Letter to the Los Angeles Times," The Wisdom Fund, March 7, 2005
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, "The War On Truth: 9/11, Disinformation And The Anatomy Of Terrorism," Olive Branch Press (April 15, 2005)
[In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft - and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling. . . .
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items--George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.), "911 and the Precautionary Principle: Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity," Physics911.net, April 23, 2005]
C-SPAN AUDIO / VIDEO / VIDEO: David Ray Griffin, "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions," Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, April 28, 2005
Michael Shermer, Fahrenheit 2777: 9/11 has generated the mother of all conspiracy theories, Scientific American, May 23, 2005
[The U.S. Department of Justice has yet to respond to an October 24, 2005 appeal, filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), for 85 videotapes of the September 11, 2001 crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
The existence of the videotapes "in the possession of the FBI [was] described in the declaration of Special Agent ("SA") Jacqueline Maguire dated September 7, 2005, in the lawsuit captioned Bingham v. United States Department of Justice," according to Scott A. Hodes, Attorney at Law.--FOIA request for videotapes of 9/11 Pentagon crash stalled, 9/11 Special Interest Group, January 1, 2006]
["I could see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit windshield or other window from the plane."--Jamie McIntyre, "Debris," Pentagon Research]
[Then I picked it up as it struck very low into the Pentagon. The wings folded back and it was like watching someone slam an empty aluminum can into a wall. The jet folded up like an accordion. . . . I knew it was a big commercial airline. I saw the AA on the side so I knew it was an American Airlines passenger jet.--Mike Walter, "Debris," Pentagon Research]
[She said Hanjour, a Saudi who is believed to have piloted the American Airlines plane that crashed into the Pentagon, was a poor pilot who spoke limited English.--Jerry Markon and William Branigin, "FAA Reportedly Dismissed Moussaoui Concern," Washington Post, March 22, 2006]
[The physical and eyewitness evidence are thus mutually corroborating--Jim Hoffman, "The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows," 911research, March 28, 2006]
VIDEO: Pierre-Henri Bunel, New official 9/11 video: The Pentagon Magic Plane, Global Research, May 19, 2006
Dan Eggen, "9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon," Washington Post, August 2, 2006
[We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircraft to have struck down the light poles.--"Flight Data Recorder Analysis - Last Second of Data - 09:37:44," pilotsfor911truth.org, August 20, 2006]
[Clearly, if the official story that flight 77 hit the Pentagon at 9:37 were true, Flight 77 could not have been the source of massive damage to the west side of the building a minimum of five minutes earlier at 9:32. . . . Multiple standard-issue, battery-operated wall clocks . . . stopped between 9:31 and 9:32-1/2 on September 11. . . .
The Pentagon was attacked by bomb(s) at or around 9:32 am, possibly followed by an impact from an airborne object significantly smaller than Flight 77, a Boeing 757. . . .
Gen. Larry Arnold, revealed that he ordered one of his jets to fly down low over the Pentagon shortly after the attack that morning, and that his pilot reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building. The fighter jet - not flight 77 - is almost certainly the plane seen on the Dulles airport Air Traffic Controller's screen making a steep, high-speed 270-degree descent before disappearing from the radar. . . .
Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building.--Barbara Honegger, "The Pentagon Attack Papers," physics911.net, September 6, 2006]
[Note: Exhibits P200023 through P200041 are photographs of "of the Pentagon after Flight 77 crashed into the building". Photographs that tell a different story are not included.--"United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui, Criminal No. 01-455-A, Prosecution Trial Exhibits," uscourts.gov, 2006]
VIDEO: "OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11 FLIGHT CONTRADICTED BY GOVERNMENT'S OWN DATA," pilotsfor911truth.org, March 26, 2007
Jerry Mazza, "Following Zakheim And The Pentagon Trillions To Israel And 911," rense.com, March 28, 2007
John C. Ekonomou, "Mineta, Cheney and 'the orders still stand' controversy," journalof911studies.com, May 1, 2007
"In pictures: Brazil plane crash," The Wisdom Fund, July 18, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson, "9/11 First Responder Heard WTC 7 Demolition Countdown," Prison Planet, September 13, 2007
Aidan Monaghan, "FBI Refuses To Confirm Identities Of 4 Aircraft Used During 9/11 Attacks," 911blogger.com, October 3, 2007
PHOTOS: "Airbus A340-642X Crash," Toulouse, France, 15th November, 2007
"Documenting the legal process to obtain confiscated videos showing Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon on 9/11," flight77.info, 2007
[The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson's story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an "unconnected call," which (of course) lasted "0 seconds." According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.--David Ray Griffin, "Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials," Global Research, April 1, 2008]
Craig Ranke and Rob Balsamo, "The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irreconcilable with the Official Reports and Data," opednews.com, April 23, 2008
FREE BOOK: Enver Masud, "9/11 Unveiled," The Wisdom Fund (September 11, 2008)
VIDEO: Physically and aerodynamically, Arlington's unique topography and obstacles along American 77 "final leg" to the Pentagon, make this approach completely impossible--Rob Balsamo, "Arlington Topography, Obstacles Make American 77 Final Leg Impossible," Pilots For 9/11 Truth, September 12, 2008
VIDEO: "G-FORCES: 9/11 ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON," Pilots For 9/11 Truth, September 15, 2008
[April Gallop's . . . desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane allegedly hit the outside wall. As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. Hit in the head, she was able to grab the baby and make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no airplane wreckage and no burning airplane fuel anywhere; only rubble and dust. . . .
Defendant Rumsfeld in particular has been deceptive from the start, as where, on September 13, he reported on Good Morning, America that the plane "...went in through three rings (of the Pentagon). I'm told the nose is - is still in there, very close to the inner courtyard, about one ring away"--"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK," rawstory.com, December 17, 2008]
Anonymous, "Flight 77 path and lightpole struck," flickcabin.com, December 20, 2008
[Pentagon police officers SGT William Lagasse and SGT Chadwick Brooks say plane flew North of CITGO gas station . . . Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts Jr. saw the plane flying away from the building immediately after the event.--VIDEO: "The North Side Flyover," Citizen Investigation Team, 2008]
VIDEO: "Cab Driver LLoyde England's Virtual Confession," Citizen Investigation Team, 2008
What caused the debris in the foreground?
Enver Masud, "When Did Fort Meyer Fire Department Foam Unit 161 Arrive at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?," The Wisdom Fund, January 1, 2009
VIDEO: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON," Pilots For 9/11 Truth, January 4, 2009
[ . . . the 13 witnesses deliver a devastating blow to the official story about the Pentagon attack. Five 40-foot, 247-pound light poles were knocked down that day. If the plane flew north of the Citgo station, it could not have knocked down those poles. The west side of the Pentagon was damaged as if it were hit by a plane heading north, with the zone of destruction angling north. If the plane flew to the north of the Citgo station before hitting the Pentagon, it would not have caused this kind of damage.--Sheila Casey, "Eyewitnesses Contradict Pentagon 9/11 Story," Rock Creek Free Press, April 2009]
"U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Last Known Flights Of 9/11 Planes Took Place Nine Months Before 9/11; None For AA 77," 911blogger.com, June 23, 2009
VIDEO: "Eyewitness: How Accurate Is Visual Memory," CBS 60 Minutes, July 12, 2009
Enver Masud, "Flight 77: FBI exhibit contradicts Solicitor General's account of Barbara Olson's phone calls on 9/11," 911sig.blogspot.com, November 17, 2009
[ . . . two F-16s were always maintained on alert at Andrews and armed, that is, until September 11, 2001.
Also in response to the Cessna crash, White House Secret Service personnel armed with portable surface-to-air missile launchers were placed on the roof of the presidential mansion.
On that particular morning, an exercise was being conducted that resulted in the two stand-by F-16s being flown without their heat-seeking missiles.--"Two F-16s on alert to counter attacks on Washington ordered to stand down on 9/11," waynemadsenreport.com, November 25, 2009]
Rob Balsamo, "Flight Deck Door Closed For Entire Flight," pilotsfor911truth.org, November 27, 2009
Rob Balsamo, "NORTH APPROACH IMPACT ANALYSIS," pilotsfor911truth.org, January 2, 2010
"9-11 Coordinated By Cheney," waynemadsenreport.com, April 30, 2010
Enver Masud, "Pentagon Transcripts, Official Records Belie 'The 9/11 Commission Report'," The Wisdom Fund, September 10, 2010
[Bush reveals that he gave the order for any further suspected hijacked planes to be shot down after the first aircraft were flown into the World Trade Centre--James Meikle, "George Bush thought 9/11 plane had been shot down on his orders," Guardian, October 29, 2010]
"Instructor/Airshow Pilot Questions 911 Scenario," December 23, 2010
[Flight Data Recorder Expert Dennis Cimino has confirmed that the data being provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is missing crucial information, which according to Dennis, should be present and link the data to a specific aircraft and fleet. . . . The data also exceeds the design limitations and capabilities of a standard 757 by a wide margin.--Rob Balsamo, "Flight Data Expert Confirmation: No Evidence Linking FDR Data to American 77," pilotsfor911truth.org, January 20, 2011]
Rob Balsamo, "Aircraft Departure Gate Positional Data Conflicts With Government Story," pilotsfor911truth.org, February 28, 2011
Rob Balsamo, "Overwhelming Evidence Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757," pilotsfor911truth.org, March 3, 2011
March 25, 2011
Webster Griffin Tarpley, "The Forty-Six Exercises and Drills of 9/11," truthjihad.com, August 20, 2011
[The 3 exit holes are perfectly round and look more like a punch out hole made from a shape charge. There is a V shaped symbol with a line through it which is an international rescue symbol for dead victims removed. This tells rescue workers that all victims have been removed. There were 3 C ring exit holes.--"Barbara Honegger And The Pentagon Attack Papers in 2 Minutes," vidrebel.wordpress.com, September 11, 2011]
MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION: Enver Masud, "9/11: The Pentagon," 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, June 15, 2012
VIDEO: Dennis Cimino, "911 Pentagon Flight Recorder Fraud Revealed," 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, June 18, 2012
Enver Masud, "9/11: Evidence of Complicity and Cover-up at the Pentagon," The Wisdom Fund, July 12, 2012
FILM: Massimo Mazzucco, "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor," luogocomune.net, 2013 [Missing black boxes at 1.20.15]
VIDEO: "9/11 Aircraft - Why Fly So Fast?," pilotsfor911truth.org, June 9, 2014
"American Airlines Flight 77 Hijack Impossible, FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT," pilotsfor911truth.org, June 23, 2014
DISSENTING VIEW: "Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate," foreignpolicyjournal.com, October 7, 2016
Abhimanyu Ghoshal, "Eerie tech promises to copy anyone's voice from just 1 minute of audio," thenextweb.com, April 24, 2017
[The assertion by Scientists for 9/11 Truth that Sandia National Laboratories' F-4 Phantom jet test represents what happened at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 is utter nonsense--Enver Masud, "Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate? Evidence Contradicts Scientists for 9/11 Truth," The Wisdom Fund, August 30, 2017]
Jack White's 9/11 Photo Studies
this post and the one before that, i dont think i need to tell you that you have langley agents candyass and toddsterparrot shitting in their pants running scared to their handlers asking them what propaganda they should post to try and get around your hard irrefutable evidence right?
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 51,592
- 18,927
- 2,250
Staged Taxi & Light Pole
www.thepentacon.com
candyass can NOW shut up about his rambling of the lightpoles sense 2021 now.
you brilliantly took him to school better than ANYBODY ever has combined.
as i said before,this is YOU standing mocking candyass as he is on the floor after YOU ko'd him.
as i said earlier,we learned something new today that you are BOTH black these photos that were taken of you two,nice paid of white shorts you are wearing there,wonder where candyass got his black shorts he has lying on the floormat huh?.
Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 20,943
- 6,400
- 335
- Banned
- #612
As usual the loser who cannot post a fact throws emojis everywhere to pretend he won an argument
candyass can NOW shut up about his rambling of the lightpoles sense 2021 now.
you brilliantly took him to school better than ANYBODY ever has combined.
as i said before,this is YOU standing mocking candyass as he is on the floor after YOU ko'd him.
as i said earlier,we learned something new today that you are BOTH black these photos that were taken of you two,nice paid of white shorts you are wearing there,wonder where candyass got his black shorts he has lying on the floormat huh?.
View attachment 1222854
candycorn
Diamond Member
No it doesn’t. Otherwise planes couldn’t launch them.
Also, poles that were not in the flight path of AA77 were not affected....somehow the rather humorous notion of an “air wake” didn’t affect them.
To the surprise of nobody...you’re wrong.
One of the poles that was grazed on the way:
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,210
- 17,817
- 2,788
Laughable. The plane allows the missile to drop below the plane before it ignites its rocket...
A cruise missile's air wake is just like any other wake, it weakens the further it gets away from the source.
- Low-Altitude Effects: Because cruise missiles frequently fly just meters above the ground or sea surface to avoid detection, the air wake interacts with the surface, creating ground-effect turbulence.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,210
- 17,817
- 2,788
Then REPEAT THE EXPERIMENT for us ....
except Mossad hired FELIX BAUMGARTNER to do that, and your chickenshit ass is too cowardly to try...
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,210
- 17,817
- 2,788
^^^^^^^
Obvious Mossad PHOTOshop job...
Notice too that Toddster is a higher ranking, higher paid Mossad than candy. Candy just posts propaganda, if the debate gets too tough for her, another higher ranking Mossad appears....
No matter, Toddster is ZERO for however many science related debates with EMH on USMB, ZERO....
Obvious Mossad PHOTOshop job...
Notice too that Toddster is a higher ranking, higher paid Mossad than candy. Candy just posts propaganda, if the debate gets too tough for her, another higher ranking Mossad appears....
No matter, Toddster is ZERO for however many science related debates with EMH on USMB, ZERO....
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,210
- 17,817
- 2,788
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
How many of you post here mostly just to be social?- Started by Anomalism
- Replies: 13
-
Trump says 'if anything' he forced Israel's hand on Iran attack timing, says Iran was going to strike US first- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 3
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
Military Leaders Pushing Armageddon Views On Troops As War In Iran Begins- Latest: Fort Fun Indiana
-
