$80 million of Your tax dollars are being used to protect illegal immigrants from making sure they appear for their asylum hearings..

[healthmyths]

Biden Admin Awards $80 Million Contract That Prohibits GPS Monitoring Of Illegal Immigrants
Experts say system will make it impossible to keep track of migrants released into US
The Biden administration is spending nearly $80 million on a new system to monitor illegal immigrants that prohibits the use of any GPS technology, a decision that experts say will make it impossible to locate their whereabouts after their release into the United States.

Biden Admin Awards $80 Million Contract That Prohibits GPS Monitoring Of Illegal Immigrants

The Biden administration is spending nearly $80 million on a new system to monitor illegal immigrants that prohibits the use of any GPS technology, a decision that experts say will make it impossible to locate their whereabouts after their release into the United States.

freebeacon.com

 

[Donald H]

Christians may be divided on this issue.

They might equate it to being the 'number of the beast'!

 

[jc456]

Biden Admin Awards $80 Million Contract That Prohibits GPS Monitoring Of Illegal Immigrants
Experts say system will make it impossible to keep track of migrants released into US
The Biden administration is spending nearly $80 million on a new system to monitor illegal immigrants that prohibits the use of any GPS technology, a decision that experts say will make it impossible to locate their whereabouts after their release into the United States.

Biden Admin Awards $80 Million Contract That Prohibits GPS Monitoring Of Illegal Immigrants

The Biden administration is spending nearly $80 million on a new system to monitor illegal immigrants that prohibits the use of any GPS technology, a decision that experts say will make it impossible to locate their whereabouts after their release into the United States.

freebeacon.com

And homelessness increases for citizens.

Let’s hear from his supporters

 

[ABikerSailor]

You do realize that most immigrants (both illegal and legal) show up for their hearings, right?

11 Years of Government Data Reveal That Immigrants Do Show Up for Court

A new report released today by the American Immigration Council examines 11 years of government data on the rate at which immigrants appear for hearings in U.S. immigration court. The report, “Measuring In Absentia Removal in Immigration Court,” concludes that an overwhelming 83% of immigrants...

www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org

WASHINGTON—A new report released today by the American Immigration Council examines 11 years of government data on the rate at which immigrants appear for hearings in U.S. immigration court. The report, “Measuring In Absentia Removal in Immigration Court,” concludes that an overwhelming 83% of immigrants attend their immigration court hearings, and those who fail to appear in court often did not receive notice or faced hardship in getting to court.

As the new administration of President Joe Biden considers how to reform the immigration system, including the immigration courts, this report reveals how reliance on detention, access to legal representation, and immigration judges’ docket management impact immigrants’ appearance rate.

The report draws on government data from 2,797,437 immigration court removal proceedings held between 2008 to 2018. It documents how individuals who were never detained and those who were released from detention proceeded through court and what obstacles they faced in pursuing their immigration cases.

The report finds that people released from immigration detention and individuals with attorneys overwhelmingly attend their hearings. Data also show that immigration judges have a vital role in maintaining due process. The findings further demonstrate that the creation of an independent structure for the immigration courts would help reduce the prevalence of unwarranted in absentia removal orders and give immigration judges more discretion in managing their dockets and individual case decisions.

 

[martybegan]

You do realize that most immigrants (both illegal and legal) show up for their hearings, right?

11 Years of Government Data Reveal That Immigrants Do Show Up for Court

A new report released today by the American Immigration Council examines 11 years of government data on the rate at which immigrants appear for hearings in U.S. immigration court. The report, “Measuring In Absentia Removal in Immigration Court,” concludes that an overwhelming 83% of immigrants...

www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org

WASHINGTON—A new report released today by the American Immigration Council examines 11 years of government data on the rate at which immigrants appear for hearings in U.S. immigration court. The report, “Measuring In Absentia Removal in Immigration Court,” concludes that an overwhelming 83% of immigrants attend their immigration court hearings, and those who fail to appear in court often did not receive notice or faced hardship in getting to court.

As the new administration of President Joe Biden considers how to reform the immigration system, including the immigration courts, this report reveals how reliance on detention, access to legal representation, and immigration judges’ docket management impact immigrants’ appearance rate.

The report draws on government data from 2,797,437 immigration court removal proceedings held between 2008 to 2018. It documents how individuals who were never detained and those who were released from detention proceeded through court and what obstacles they faced in pursuing their immigration cases.

The report finds that people released from immigration detention and individuals with attorneys overwhelmingly attend their hearings. Data also show that immigration judges have a vital role in maintaining due process. The findings further demonstrate that the creation of an independent structure for the immigration courts would help reduce the prevalence of unwarranted in absentia removal orders and give immigration judges more discretion in managing their dockets and individual case decisions.

2008 to 2018...........

and it' qualified as "individuals with attorneys"

 

[ABikerSailor]

and it' qualified as "individuals with attorneys"

Wrong. It says:

The report finds that people released from immigration detention and individuals with attorneys overwhelmingly attend their hearings."

That is all of them, both people who were detained and released, as well as those who had attorneys.

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

 

[jc456]

Wrong. It says:

The report finds that people released from immigration detention and individuals with attorneys overwhelmingly attend their hearings."

That is all of them, both people who were detained and released, as well as those who had attorneys.

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

Prove it

 

[ABikerSailor]

Prove it

Post 4 has a link to the government study that I quoted. Go read it yourself, the link is there.

 

[jc456]

Post 4 has a link to the government study that I quoted. Go read it yourself, the link is there.

I don’t believe the xidens

 

[martybegan]

Wrong. It says:

The report finds that people released from immigration detention and individuals with attorneys overwhelmingly attend their hearings."

That is all of them, both people who were detained and released, as well as those who had attorneys.

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

How many were brought to the hearings, and how many times were they given passes?

Again, 2008-2018.

 

[ABikerSailor]

How many were brought to the hearings, and how many times were they given passes?

Again, 2008-2018.

According to the study (if you'd bothered to read the link) 83 percent of them went to the hearings willingly (didn't have to be brought in by force), and those that didn't, either weren't notified of their hearing in time, or they had a hardship that prevented them from timely attendance.

 

[martybegan]

According to the study (if you'd bothered to read the link) 83 percent of them went to the hearings willingly (didn't have to be brought in by force), and those that didn't, either weren't notified of their hearing in time, or they had a hardship that prevented them from timely attendance.

And in other news the chocolate ration has been increased from 25 grams to 20 grams.

 

[Ralph Norton]

According to the study (if you'd bothered to read the link) 83 percent of them went to the hearings willingly (didn't have to be brought in by force), and those that didn't, either weren't notified of their hearing in time, or they had a hardship that prevented them from timely attendance.

So not one simply never showed at all and could not be located?
Not one?
There's some ocean front property in Kansas you should look at.

 

[ABikerSailor]

So not one simply never showed at all and could not be located?
Not one?
There's some ocean front property in Kansas you should look at.

Never said that. Just posted a government study showing that the vast majority of them showed up without having to be brought in, and most of those that did miss were either not notified in time, or they had a hardship come up that prevented them from being there at the appointed time. There might be a very small percentage that did what you are talking about, but apparently it was too small of a percentage to mention in the study.

 

[jc456]

Never said that. Just posted a government study showing that the vast majority of them showed up without having to be brought in, and most of those that did miss were either not notified in time, or they had a hardship come up that prevented them from being there at the appointed time. There might be a very small percentage that did what you are talking about, but apparently it was too small of a percentage to mention in the study.

they don't even know how many came here.

 

[ABikerSailor]

they don't even know how many came here.

They know how many were given court dates, and what percentage of them showed up.

 

[jc456]

They know how many were given court dates, and what percentage of them showed up.

so? they have no idea how many are here. let alone how many came to court.

 

[ABikerSailor]

so? they have no idea how many are here. let alone how many came to court.

I'll give you that first part, but as for the second part? If they are given a court date, a record is made showing when they are supposed to be there. If they show up, the record is noted that they showed up. If they didn't, the record is noted that they didn't show up. Yes, for those who were given court dates, they know exactly how many showed up. Apparently, you don't know how courts operate, do you?

 

[jc456]

I'll give you that first part, but as for the second part? If they are given a court date, a record is made showing when they are supposed to be there. If they show up, the record is noted that they showed up. If they didn't, the record is noted that they didn't show up. Yes, for those who were given court dates, they know exactly how many showed up. Apparently, you don't know how courts operate, do you?

cherry picked OP

 

[Winston]

cherry picked OP

STFU, I mean get the hell off this messageboard. 83% showed up. I doubt 83% of dumbass Trumpbots convicted of DUI showed up in court. You are too stupid to vote and damn sure too stupid to post on a messageboard. Go darn some damn socks or something and quit wasting all our time. Fawking fool.