72% say Benghazi panel politically motivated

So what? It's irrelevant. The questions exist, the lies happened, she must be held accountable.
So what? It's irrelevant. The questions exist, the lies happened, she must be held accountable.

^^ Just said nothing. Questions always exist, and if thats all you got then its pretty thin

Thin? You're an ass. 4people died, Clinton and others lied about it. Likely there is more to it than that, but you have to ask questions to find out.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

So, all the other attacks on American embassies and consulates in the last 15 years were all handled on the up and up? Can you say "Ooops?", BedPan?

Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

rulings%2Ftom-mostlytrue.gif

That is just as irrelevant today as the first time some dumbass left wing nutter posted it. It's too stupid to waste time debunking it AGAIN. Go play in the street retard.

Why weren't these attacks and deaths investigated? Just answer the question.
Juxtapositioning data is sometimes the only way we can discern the facts from pure fucking stupid Republican partisan bullshit, BedPan.
 
Benghazi hearing: Poll: 3-in-4 say panel is political - CNNPolitics.com

The GOP overreaches on everything. Then they wonder why they keep losing support on the national level.


I can believe that, especially with the way Paul Begala spinning the current round of hearings on CNN. And I'm not going to say that, at this point, they're not. I will say that there are questions that should be asked and answered, but they should have been asked and answered a fuckload sooner than now.
 
Benghazi hearing: Poll: 3-in-4 say panel is political - CNNPolitics.com

The GOP overreaches on everything. Then they wonder why they keep losing support on the national level.
Sad that it's such a low percentage. That goes to show we have some real idiots in this country.

Since when is a Crime not a Crime? By public opinion?

By the way....

If Bush Jr. did what hillary did when we bombed Libya the left to this day would be screaming war crimes.

Secret recordings: US military distrusted Hillary on Libya

Secret phone recordings have revealed that a Democratic member of Congress and top Pentagon leaders went around then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to negotiate with the Libyan regime of Muammar Gadhafi because they were convinced she was hell-bent on taking the U.S. to war.

America's intelligence community was conerned that Clinton was sanitizing their reports to make the case for military intervention on the basis of an impending genocide in the port city of Benghazi, even though there was scant evidence that Gadhafi's military was prepared to massacre rebel groups.

The U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff dispatched a middle-man in July 2011 to tell the dictator's son, Seif Gadhafi, that internal State Department reports sent to members of Congress were 'just full of stupid, stupid facts.'

The younger Gadaffi, later captured after his father's summary execution and now in a prison cell, told the Americans who phoned him behind Clinton's back that many U.S.-supported armed rebel groups were 'gangsters and terrorists,' and 'not freedom fighters.'
 
Benghazi hearing: Poll: 3-in-4 say panel is political - CNNPolitics.com

The GOP overreaches on everything. Then they wonder why they keep losing support on the national level.
Sad that it's such a low percentage. That goes to show we have some real idiots in this country.

Since when is a Crime not a Crime? By public opinion?

By the way....

If Bush Jr. did what hillary did when we bombed Libya the left to this day would be screaming war crimes.

Secret recordings: US military distrusted Hillary on Libya

Secret phone recordings have revealed that a Democratic member of Congress and top Pentagon leaders went around then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to negotiate with the Libyan regime of Muammar Gadhafi because they were convinced she was hell-bent on taking the U.S. to war.

America's intelligence community was conerned that Clinton was sanitizing their reports to make the case for military intervention on the basis of an impending genocide in the port city of Benghazi, even though there was scant evidence that Gadhafi's military was prepared to massacre rebel groups.

The U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff dispatched a middle-man in July 2011 to tell the dictator's son, Seif Gadhafi, that internal State Department reports sent to members of Congress were 'just full of stupid, stupid facts.'

The younger Gadaffi, later captured after his father's summary execution and now in a prison cell, told the Americans who phoned him behind Clinton's back that many U.S.-supported armed rebel groups were 'gangsters and terrorists,' and 'not freedom fighters.'

You asked "since when is a crime not a crime?" I ask you since when is "not a crime" a crime?
 
yeah and more than that said the same when democrats were investigating some FBI desk jockey for FIVE YEARS, Valier Plame. Didn't see all you on the left whining then

Democrats investigate the Plame affair for five years?
I didn't know the Grand Jury hearing by a Republican appointed investigator was run by the Dems, during GOP control of Congress.

Lie... It wasn't 5 years... one month over 2 years...

I can't understand how any of the crazies can call Hillary a liar when they have a detached relationship with reality themselves.


Well, in this case it's Staph, who's probably about the dumbest, unhinged nutbag on here.
at least I'm not a hateful person like you are
yeah and more than that said the same when democrats were investigating some FBI desk jockey for FIVE YEARS, Valier Plame. Didn't see all you on the left whining then

Democrats investigate the Plame affair for five years?
I didn't know the Grand Jury hearing by a Republican appointed investigator was run by the Dems, during GOP control of Congress.

Lie... It wasn't 5 years... one month over 2 years...

I can't understand how any of the crazies can call Hillary a liar when they have a detached relationship with reality themselves.


Well, in this case it's Staph, who's probably about the dumbest, unhinged nutbag on here.

You should look in a mirror to see unhinged and nutbag. now have a nice day if that's possible
 
yeah and more than that said the same when democrats were investigating some FBI desk jockey for FIVE YEARS, Valier Plame. Didn't see all you on the left whining then

Democrats investigate the Plame affair for five years?
I didn't know the Grand Jury hearing by a Republican appointed investigator was run by the Dems, during GOP control of Congress.

Lie... It wasn't 5 years... one month over 2 years...

I can't understand how any of the crazies can call Hillary a liar when they have a detached relationship with reality themselves.


Well, in this case it's Staph, who's probably about the dumbest, unhinged nutbag on here.
at least I'm not a hateful person like you are
yeah and more than that said the same when democrats were investigating some FBI desk jockey for FIVE YEARS, Valier Plame. Didn't see all you on the left whining then

Democrats investigate the Plame affair for five years?
I didn't know the Grand Jury hearing by a Republican appointed investigator was run by the Dems, during GOP control of Congress.

Lie... It wasn't 5 years... one month over 2 years...

I can't understand how any of the crazies can call Hillary a liar when they have a detached relationship with reality themselves.


Well, in this case it's Staph, who's probably about the dumbest, unhinged nutbag on here.

You should look in a mirror to see unhinged and nutbag. now have a nice day if that's possible


Shouldn't dish it out so much if you can't take it.
 
So what? It's irrelevant. The questions exist, the lies happened, she must be held accountable.
So what? It's irrelevant. The questions exist, the lies happened, she must be held accountable.

^^ Just said nothing. Questions always exist, and if thats all you got then its pretty thin

Thin? You're an ass. 4people died, Clinton and others lied about it. Likely there is more to it than that, but you have to ask questions to find out.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

So, all the other attacks on American embassies and consulates in the last 15 years were all handled on the up and up? Can you say "Ooops?", BedPan?

Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

rulings%2Ftom-mostlytrue.gif

That is just as irrelevant today as the first time some dumbass left wing nutter posted it. It's too stupid to waste time debunking it AGAIN. Go play in the street retard.

Why weren't these attacks and deaths investigated? Just answer the question.
Juxtapositioning data is sometimes the only way we can discern the facts from pure fucking stupid Republican partisan bullshit, BedPan.


lmao!!!!

for people acting smug about Hillary's chances these left-wing losers SURE ARE ANGRY!!/
 
Majority of voters think Hillary is untrustworthy: poll ...
nypost.com/.../majority-of-voters-think-hillary-is-untrustworthy-poll
Apr 23, 2015 · ... say Hillary Clinton is not ... A majority of US voters — 54 percent — say Hillary Clinton is ... Majority of voters think Hillary is untrustworthy ...


I don't trust her but she is kicking ass today. Unflappable, calm, collected. Trey Gowdy probably has a wet spot on his chairman's seat by now.
 
So what? It's irrelevant. The questions exist, the lies happened, she must be held accountable.
^^ Just said nothing. Questions always exist, and if thats all you got then its pretty thin

Thin? You're an ass. 4people died, Clinton and others lied about it. Likely there is more to it than that, but you have to ask questions to find out.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

So, all the other attacks on American embassies and consulates in the last 15 years were all handled on the up and up? Can you say "Ooops?", BedPan?

Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

rulings%2Ftom-mostlytrue.gif

That is just as irrelevant today as the first time some dumbass left wing nutter posted it. It's too stupid to waste time debunking it AGAIN. Go play in the street retard.

Why weren't these attacks and deaths investigated? Just answer the question.
Juxtapositioning data is sometimes the only way we can discern the facts from pure fucking stupid Republican partisan bullshit, BedPan.


lmao!!!!

for people acting smug about Hillary's chances these left-wing losers SURE ARE ANGRY!!/

I see you don't care to answer the question, either, unibrow.
 
Benghazi hearing: Poll: 3-in-4 say panel is political - CNNPolitics.com

The GOP overreaches on everything. Then they wonder why they keep losing support on the national level.
Sad that it's such a low percentage. That goes to show we have some real idiots in this country.

Since when is a Crime not a Crime? By public opinion?

By the way....

If Bush Jr. did what hillary did when we bombed Libya the left to this day would be screaming war crimes.

Secret recordings: US military distrusted Hillary on Libya

Secret phone recordings have revealed that a Democratic member of Congress and top Pentagon leaders went around then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to negotiate with the Libyan regime of Muammar Gadhafi because they were convinced she was hell-bent on taking the U.S. to war.

America's intelligence community was conerned that Clinton was sanitizing their reports to make the case for military intervention on the basis of an impending genocide in the port city of Benghazi, even though there was scant evidence that Gadhafi's military was prepared to massacre rebel groups.

The U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff dispatched a middle-man in July 2011 to tell the dictator's son, Seif Gadhafi, that internal State Department reports sent to members of Congress were 'just full of stupid, stupid facts.'

The younger Gadaffi, later captured after his father's summary execution and now in a prison cell, told the Americans who phoned him behind Clinton's back that many U.S.-supported armed rebel groups were 'gangsters and terrorists,' and 'not freedom fighters.'

a crime is a crime when RW's can't prove its really a crime ..

hope that helps ...
 
So what? It's irrelevant. The questions exist, the lies happened, she must be held accountable.
Thin? You're an ass. 4people died, Clinton and others lied about it. Likely there is more to it than that, but you have to ask questions to find out.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

So, all the other attacks on American embassies and consulates in the last 15 years were all handled on the up and up? Can you say "Ooops?", BedPan?

Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

rulings%2Ftom-mostlytrue.gif

That is just as irrelevant today as the first time some dumbass left wing nutter posted it. It's too stupid to waste time debunking it AGAIN. Go play in the street retard.

Why weren't these attacks and deaths investigated? Just answer the question.
Juxtapositioning data is sometimes the only way we can discern the facts from pure fucking stupid Republican partisan bullshit, BedPan.


lmao!!!!

for people acting smug about Hillary's chances these left-wing losers SURE ARE ANGRY!!/

I see you don't care to answer the question, either, unibrow.

nobody lied about the bush attacks moron

keep trying..............
 
Benghazi hearing: Poll: 3-in-4 say panel is political - CNNPolitics.com

The GOP overreaches on everything. Then they wonder why they keep losing support on the national level.
Sad that it's such a low percentage. That goes to show we have some real idiots in this country.

Since when is a Crime not a Crime? By public opinion?

By the way....

If Bush Jr. did what hillary did when we bombed Libya the left to this day would be screaming war crimes.

Secret recordings: US military distrusted Hillary on Libya

Secret phone recordings have revealed that a Democratic member of Congress and top Pentagon leaders went around then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to negotiate with the Libyan regime of Muammar Gadhafi because they were convinced she was hell-bent on taking the U.S. to war.

America's intelligence community was conerned that Clinton was sanitizing their reports to make the case for military intervention on the basis of an impending genocide in the port city of Benghazi, even though there was scant evidence that Gadhafi's military was prepared to massacre rebel groups.

The U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff dispatched a middle-man in July 2011 to tell the dictator's son, Seif Gadhafi, that internal State Department reports sent to members of Congress were 'just full of stupid, stupid facts.'

The younger Gadaffi, later captured after his father's summary execution and now in a prison cell, told the Americans who phoned him behind Clinton's back that many U.S.-supported armed rebel groups were 'gangsters and terrorists,' and 'not freedom fighters.'

a crime is a crime when RW's can't prove its really a crime ..

hope that helps ...

from the morons saying we "lied to go to war" for the past 14 years

funny stuff

libs are simply laughable idiots!!! lol
 
Benghazi hearing: Poll: 3-in-4 say panel is political - CNNPolitics.com

The GOP overreaches on everything. Then they wonder why they keep losing support on the national level.
Sad that it's such a low percentage. That goes to show we have some real idiots in this country.

Since when is a Crime not a Crime? By public opinion?

By the way....

If Bush Jr. did what hillary did when we bombed Libya the left to this day would be screaming war crimes.

Secret recordings: US military distrusted Hillary on Libya

Secret phone recordings have revealed that a Democratic member of Congress and top Pentagon leaders went around then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to negotiate with the Libyan regime of Muammar Gadhafi because they were convinced she was hell-bent on taking the U.S. to war.

America's intelligence community was conerned that Clinton was sanitizing their reports to make the case for military intervention on the basis of an impending genocide in the port city of Benghazi, even though there was scant evidence that Gadhafi's military was prepared to massacre rebel groups.

The U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff dispatched a middle-man in July 2011 to tell the dictator's son, Seif Gadhafi, that internal State Department reports sent to members of Congress were 'just full of stupid, stupid facts.'

The younger Gadaffi, later captured after his father's summary execution and now in a prison cell, told the Americans who phoned him behind Clinton's back that many U.S.-supported armed rebel groups were 'gangsters and terrorists,' and 'not freedom fighters.'

a crime is a crime when RW's can't prove its really a crime ..

hope that helps ...

You do know she is still under criminal investigation by the F.B.I. correct?

FBI Director Won't Comment On Ongoing Hillary Clinton Investigation
 
So what? It's irrelevant. The questions exist, the lies happened, she must be held accountable.

^^ Just said nothing. Questions always exist, and if thats all you got then its pretty thin

Thin? You're an ass. 4people died, Clinton and others lied about it. Likely there is more to it than that, but you have to ask questions to find out.

Just how fucking stupid are you?


They lied how again?
About blaming it on a video to us the united state's citizens, after telling the leader of Egypt, it was a terrorist attack.
 

Forum List

Back
Top